Less than a week after a South Korean team announced a major breakthrough in stem-cell research, American rivals may have already gone one better, the British magazine <
The South Korean technique "could already be obsolete," the British weekly reported, cautioning however that the US claim has yet to be confirmed.
The South Korean team won high praise but also ignited controversy when they unveiled their method for cloning embryonic stem cells, the primitive "master cells" that are at the forefront of medical research.
The hope is that, one day, stem cells can be coaxed into growing into specific cells to help replenish dead or damaged tissue in the brain, liver, skin, retina and other organs.
To overcome rejection by the patient, the goal is to take an embryonic stem-cell and reprogram it using the patient's own DNA -- to make a clone.
But the cloned cells would not be allowed to grow into a baby. Instead, after a few days, they would be harvested and allowed to develop into duplicating lines of stem cells --
a key phase in the attempt to get
them to "differentiate" into specific cells.
The main achievement of the South Koreans, led by Seoul National University professor Woo Suk Hwang, was the success rate in getting a very high number of cloned stem-cell lines out of the donated eggs used to get the embryo.
a simpler method
Now, according to New Scientist, a team headed by Yuri Verlinsky of the Reproductive Genetics Institute in Chicago claims to have made patient-matched human stem cells far more simply and without having to use therapeutic cloning.
Verlinsky has patented his technique and details of it are sketchy, according to the report, which appeared in yesterday's issue.
He first removes the programming core, or nucleus, of existing embryonic stem cells, apparently by placing the cells in a centrifuge and spinning them until the denser nucleus is forced out.
The enucleated egg is then "fused" with cells taken from adults.
The idea is that the stem cell's cytoplasm -- the part of the cell that is responsible for cell functions -- reprograms the donor nuclei, turning the fused cell into an embryonic stem cell, but one that is genetically identical to the adult donor.
tentative success
Verlinsky claims to have created 10 lines of embryonic stem cells using this so-called "stembrid" method.
But so far he has only outlined his research at a medical conference in London, not submitted it to a peer-reviewed publication, and many experts are skeptical, New Scientist said.
They demand to see evidence that Verlinsky's "stembrids" are an exact genetic copy of the donor. Even the tiniest genetic flaws could have enormous repercussions.
"Verlinsky's method would have huge advantages if it really does work," New Scientist said.
It would bypass the need to acquire large numbers of fresh human eggs for human cloning, a challenge that is both expensive and in some countries impossible on legal grounds.
And it would also dampen ethical objections, as scientists could use existing lines of embryonic stem cells and not create any more embryos.
The South Korean announcement unleashed objections from some groups that it marked a dangerous step towards reproductive cloning -- the deliberate creation of duplicate children.
One of the biggest sore spots in Taiwan’s historical friendship with the US came in 1979 when US president Jimmy Carter broke off formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) government so that the US could establish relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Taiwan’s derecognition came purely at China’s insistence, and the US took the deal. Retired American diplomat John Tkacik, who for almost decade surrounding that schism, from 1974 to 1982, worked in embassies in Taipei and Beijing and at the Taiwan Desk in Washington DC, recently argued in the Taipei Times that “President Carter’s derecognition
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
RSS