Less than a week after a South Korean team announced a major breakthrough in stem-cell research, American rivals may have already gone one better, the British magazine <
The South Korean technique "could already be obsolete," the British weekly reported, cautioning however that the US claim has yet to be confirmed.
The South Korean team won high praise but also ignited controversy when they unveiled their method for cloning embryonic stem cells, the primitive "master cells" that are at the forefront of medical research.
The hope is that, one day, stem cells can be coaxed into growing into specific cells to help replenish dead or damaged tissue in the brain, liver, skin, retina and other organs.
To overcome rejection by the patient, the goal is to take an embryonic stem-cell and reprogram it using the patient's own DNA -- to make a clone.
But the cloned cells would not be allowed to grow into a baby. Instead, after a few days, they would be harvested and allowed to develop into duplicating lines of stem cells --
a key phase in the attempt to get
them to "differentiate" into specific cells.
The main achievement of the South Koreans, led by Seoul National University professor Woo Suk Hwang, was the success rate in getting a very high number of cloned stem-cell lines out of the donated eggs used to get the embryo.
a simpler method
Now, according to New Scientist, a team headed by Yuri Verlinsky of the Reproductive Genetics Institute in Chicago claims to have made patient-matched human stem cells far more simply and without having to use therapeutic cloning.
Verlinsky has patented his technique and details of it are sketchy, according to the report, which appeared in yesterday's issue.
He first removes the programming core, or nucleus, of existing embryonic stem cells, apparently by placing the cells in a centrifuge and spinning them until the denser nucleus is forced out.
The enucleated egg is then "fused" with cells taken from adults.
The idea is that the stem cell's cytoplasm -- the part of the cell that is responsible for cell functions -- reprograms the donor nuclei, turning the fused cell into an embryonic stem cell, but one that is genetically identical to the adult donor.
tentative success
Verlinsky claims to have created 10 lines of embryonic stem cells using this so-called "stembrid" method.
But so far he has only outlined his research at a medical conference in London, not submitted it to a peer-reviewed publication, and many experts are skeptical, New Scientist said.
They demand to see evidence that Verlinsky's "stembrids" are an exact genetic copy of the donor. Even the tiniest genetic flaws could have enormous repercussions.
"Verlinsky's method would have huge advantages if it really does work," New Scientist said.
It would bypass the need to acquire large numbers of fresh human eggs for human cloning, a challenge that is both expensive and in some countries impossible on legal grounds.
And it would also dampen ethical objections, as scientists could use existing lines of embryonic stem cells and not create any more embryos.
The South Korean announcement unleashed objections from some groups that it marked a dangerous step towards reproductive cloning -- the deliberate creation of duplicate children.
Taiwan’s English education system is being pulled apart by three opposing forces. Bilingual Nation 2030 pulls students toward English and global communication. Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness pulls them toward digital judgment, verification and AI-mediated work. But Taiwan’s old exam culture pulls them back toward memorization, grammar drills, timed reading and correct answers. If the education system keeps using old exams to define success, it risks producing graduates who are neither genuinely bilingual nor genuinely AI-ready, but trained for tasks machines can already perform. The first force is Bilingual Nation 2030. Launched in 2018, the policy aimed to “help Taiwan’s workforce connect
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
There are shadowy cabals plotting to sell out Taiwan to be annexed by China, by invasion if necessary. Fortunately, they are buffoons. In 2019, former Bamboo Union gangster and founder of the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP), Chang An-le (張安樂, colorfully known as “White Wolf”), led a protest at the Legislative Yuan against comments made by then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that in the event of an attack by China, he would never surrender, but would protect the nation by fighting to the end, even if he only had a broom. Chang had party members bring a wooden casket that they
June 1 to June 7 "If all Taiwanese were as afraid of dying as you, then what would happen?” Physician Shih Chiang-nan (施江南) reportedly said this to his wife Chen Chiao-tung (陳焦桐) after she urged him to stop intervening on behalf of Taiwanese soldiers stranded overseas after serving in the Japanese Army during World War II. Shih had clashed with high-ranking officials over the issue, engaged in several heated arguments with Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) and allegedly shouted at general Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), chief of staff of the Taiwan Garrison Command, over
RSS