Less than a week after a South Korean team announced a major breakthrough in stem-cell research, American rivals may have already gone one better, the British magazine <
The South Korean technique "could already be obsolete," the British weekly reported, cautioning however that the US claim has yet to be confirmed.
The South Korean team won high praise but also ignited controversy when they unveiled their method for cloning embryonic stem cells, the primitive "master cells" that are at the forefront of medical research.
The hope is that, one day, stem cells can be coaxed into growing into specific cells to help replenish dead or damaged tissue in the brain, liver, skin, retina and other organs.
To overcome rejection by the patient, the goal is to take an embryonic stem-cell and reprogram it using the patient's own DNA -- to make a clone.
But the cloned cells would not be allowed to grow into a baby. Instead, after a few days, they would be harvested and allowed to develop into duplicating lines of stem cells --
a key phase in the attempt to get
them to "differentiate" into specific cells.
The main achievement of the South Koreans, led by Seoul National University professor Woo Suk Hwang, was the success rate in getting a very high number of cloned stem-cell lines out of the donated eggs used to get the embryo.
a simpler method
Now, according to New Scientist, a team headed by Yuri Verlinsky of the Reproductive Genetics Institute in Chicago claims to have made patient-matched human stem cells far more simply and without having to use therapeutic cloning.
Verlinsky has patented his technique and details of it are sketchy, according to the report, which appeared in yesterday's issue.
He first removes the programming core, or nucleus, of existing embryonic stem cells, apparently by placing the cells in a centrifuge and spinning them until the denser nucleus is forced out.
The enucleated egg is then "fused" with cells taken from adults.
The idea is that the stem cell's cytoplasm -- the part of the cell that is responsible for cell functions -- reprograms the donor nuclei, turning the fused cell into an embryonic stem cell, but one that is genetically identical to the adult donor.
tentative success
Verlinsky claims to have created 10 lines of embryonic stem cells using this so-called "stembrid" method.
But so far he has only outlined his research at a medical conference in London, not submitted it to a peer-reviewed publication, and many experts are skeptical, New Scientist said.
They demand to see evidence that Verlinsky's "stembrids" are an exact genetic copy of the donor. Even the tiniest genetic flaws could have enormous repercussions.
"Verlinsky's method would have huge advantages if it really does work," New Scientist said.
It would bypass the need to acquire large numbers of fresh human eggs for human cloning, a challenge that is both expensive and in some countries impossible on legal grounds.
And it would also dampen ethical objections, as scientists could use existing lines of embryonic stem cells and not create any more embryos.
The South Korean announcement unleashed objections from some groups that it marked a dangerous step towards reproductive cloning -- the deliberate creation of duplicate children.
This month the government ordered a one-year block of Xiaohongshu (小紅書) or Rednote, a Chinese social media platform with more than 3 million users in Taiwan. The government pointed to widespread fraud activity on the platform, along with cybersecurity failures. Officials said that they had reached out to the company and asked it to change. However, they received no response. The pro-China parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), immediately swung into action, denouncing the ban as an attack on free speech. This “free speech” claim was then echoed by the People’s Republic of China (PRC),
Exceptions to the rule are sometimes revealing. For a brief few years, there was an emerging ideological split between the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) that appeared to be pushing the DPP in a direction that would be considered more liberal, and the KMT more conservative. In the previous column, “The KMT-DPP’s bureaucrat-led developmental state” (Dec. 11, page 12), we examined how Taiwan’s democratic system developed, and how both the two main parties largely accepted a similar consensus on how Taiwan should be run domestically and did not split along the left-right lines more familiar in
Most heroes are remembered for the battles they fought. Taiwan’s Black Bat Squadron is remembered for flying into Chinese airspace 838 times between 1953 and 1967, and for the 148 men whose sacrifice bought the intelligence that kept Taiwan secure. Two-thirds of the squadron died carrying out missions most people wouldn’t learn about for another 40 years. The squadron lost 15 aircraft and 148 crew members over those 14 years, making it the deadliest unit in Taiwan’s military history by casualty rate. They flew at night, often at low altitudes, straight into some of the most heavily defended airspace in Asia.
Many people in Taiwan first learned about universal basic income (UBI) — the idea that the government should provide regular, no-strings-attached payments to each citizen — in 2019. While seeking the Democratic nomination for the 2020 US presidential election, Andrew Yang, a politician of Taiwanese descent, said that, if elected, he’d institute a UBI of US$1,000 per month to “get the economic boot off of people’s throats, allowing them to lift their heads up, breathe, and get excited for the future.” His campaign petered out, but the concept of UBI hasn’t gone away. Throughout the industrialized world, there are fears that
RSS