Less than a week after a South Korean team announced a major breakthrough in stem-cell research, American rivals may have already gone one better, the British magazine <
The South Korean technique "could already be obsolete," the British weekly reported, cautioning however that the US claim has yet to be confirmed.
The South Korean team won high praise but also ignited controversy when they unveiled their method for cloning embryonic stem cells, the primitive "master cells" that are at the forefront of medical research.
The hope is that, one day, stem cells can be coaxed into growing into specific cells to help replenish dead or damaged tissue in the brain, liver, skin, retina and other organs.
To overcome rejection by the patient, the goal is to take an embryonic stem-cell and reprogram it using the patient's own DNA -- to make a clone.
But the cloned cells would not be allowed to grow into a baby. Instead, after a few days, they would be harvested and allowed to develop into duplicating lines of stem cells --
a key phase in the attempt to get
them to "differentiate" into specific cells.
The main achievement of the South Koreans, led by Seoul National University professor Woo Suk Hwang, was the success rate in getting a very high number of cloned stem-cell lines out of the donated eggs used to get the embryo.
a simpler method
Now, according to New Scientist, a team headed by Yuri Verlinsky of the Reproductive Genetics Institute in Chicago claims to have made patient-matched human stem cells far more simply and without having to use therapeutic cloning.
Verlinsky has patented his technique and details of it are sketchy, according to the report, which appeared in yesterday's issue.
He first removes the programming core, or nucleus, of existing embryonic stem cells, apparently by placing the cells in a centrifuge and spinning them until the denser nucleus is forced out.
The enucleated egg is then "fused" with cells taken from adults.
The idea is that the stem cell's cytoplasm -- the part of the cell that is responsible for cell functions -- reprograms the donor nuclei, turning the fused cell into an embryonic stem cell, but one that is genetically identical to the adult donor.
tentative success
Verlinsky claims to have created 10 lines of embryonic stem cells using this so-called "stembrid" method.
But so far he has only outlined his research at a medical conference in London, not submitted it to a peer-reviewed publication, and many experts are skeptical, New Scientist said.
They demand to see evidence that Verlinsky's "stembrids" are an exact genetic copy of the donor. Even the tiniest genetic flaws could have enormous repercussions.
"Verlinsky's method would have huge advantages if it really does work," New Scientist said.
It would bypass the need to acquire large numbers of fresh human eggs for human cloning, a challenge that is both expensive and in some countries impossible on legal grounds.
And it would also dampen ethical objections, as scientists could use existing lines of embryonic stem cells and not create any more embryos.
The South Korean announcement unleashed objections from some groups that it marked a dangerous step towards reproductive cloning -- the deliberate creation of duplicate children.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry consumes electricity at rates that would strain most national grids. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) alone accounted for more than 9 percent, or 2,590 megawatts (MW), of the nation’s power demand last year. The factories that produce chips for the world’s phones and servers run around the clock. They cannot tolerate blackouts. Yet Taiwan imports 97 percent of its energy, with liquefied natural gas reserves measured in days. Underground, Taiwan has options. Studies from National Taiwan University estimate recoverable geothermal resources at more than 33,000 MW. Current installed capacity stands below 10 MW. OBSTACLES Despite Taiwan’s significant geothermal potential, the
In our discussions of tourism in Taiwan we often criticize the government’s addiction to promoting food and shopping, while ignoring Taiwan’s underdeveloped trekking and adventure travel opportunities. This discussion, however, is decidedly land-focused. When was the last time a port entered into it? Last week I encountered journalist and travel writer Cameron Dueck, who had sailed to Taiwan in 2023-24, and was full of tales. Like everyone who visits, he and his partner Fiona Ching loved our island nation and had nothing but wonderful experiences on land. But he had little positive to say about the way Taiwan has organized its
The entire Li Zhenxiu (李貞秀) saga has been an ugly, complicated mess. Born in China’s Hunan Province, she moved to work in Shenzhen, where she met her future Taiwanese husband. Most accounts have her arriving in Taiwan and marrying somewhere between 1993 and 1999. She built a successful career in Taiwan in the tech industry before founding her own company. She also served in high-ranking positions on various environmentally-focused tech associations. She says she was inspired by the founding of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) in 2019 by Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), and began volunteering for the party soon after. Ko
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) returned from her trip to meet People’s Republic of China (PRC) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) bearing “a gift” for the people of Taiwan: 10 measures the PRC proposed to “facilitate the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.” “China on Sunday unveiled 10 new incentive measures for Taiwan,” wrote Reuters, wrongly. The PRC’s longstanding habit with Taiwan relations is to repackage already extant or once-existing policies and declare that they are “new.” The list forwarded by Cheng reflects that practice. NEW MEASURES? Note the first item: establishing regular communication mechanisms between the Chinese Communist Party
RSS