Widespread volcanic eruptions that led to global warming were likely the cause of massive extinctions 250 million years ago, not the impact of an asteroid or comet, according to two studies published in the online edition of the journal Science.
The catastrophe called the "Great Dying" wiped out 90 percent of the planet's marine life and 70 per cent of all plant and animal life. The most recent popular scientific belief about what caused it was the impact of a large object from space, but the examination of sediment and fossils deposited at the time has led two groups of scientists to rethink those beliefs.
"Animals and plants both on land and in the sea were dying at the same time and apparently from the same causes -- too much heat and too little oxygen," said Peter Ward, a University of Washington paleontologist and lead author of one of the studies.
In the research published in Science Express, the online version of the journal Science, and slated to be published in Science's print edition, the groups found increased levels of sulphur and depleted oxygen in the ancient rock.
Ward and his team of researchers from the US and South Africa, surmised that the sulphur came from continuous volcanic eruptions in an area known as the Siberian Traps. The eruptions warmed the Earth, trapping sunlight and depleting oxygen in the air, he said.
At the same time, the Earth's shifting tectonic plates lowered the levels of the ocean, exposing seabeds and releasing methane trapped in the sediment there, further stoking the global warming, the research indicated.
"I think temperatures rose to a critical point," Ward said. "It got hotter and hotter until it reached a critical point and everything died."
"It was a double-whammy of warmer temperatures and low oxygen, and most life couldn't deal with it," he added.
He said temperatures around the world rose 80C, killing off plants, which served as food for many animals, starving them.
In addition, he said, oxygen levels dropped to about 16 percent of the atmosphere when normal levels today are at 21 percent. Such a drop would be equivalent to trying to breathe on top of a 4,250m mountain, he said.
"High and intermediate elevations would have become uninhabitable," he said. "More than half the world would have been unlivable. Life could only exist at the lowest elevations."
The Great Dying occurred between the Permian and Triassic periods, when all of today's continents were concentrated in one great land mass called Pangea.
Ward and his team studied 300m-thick sediment from Pangea, today's Karoo Basin in South Africa and off the coast of China, while a second team, led by Kliti Grice, a paleontologist with Curtin University of Technology in Perth, Australia, looked at sentiment from the Perth Basin.
Ward said the findings of the two teams were "eerily similar."
Grice's researchers -- from Australia, China, the US, Germany and Britain -- found that the ocean was low in oxygen and teeming with sulphur-loving bacteria while Ward's team found that life had been dying off slowly for about 10 million years before a rapid dying rate marked the next 5 million years.
The scientists said they found no evidence of an impact by an asteroid or comet. They said that if an impact had occurred, it would have been a minor element in the mass extinction.
Taiwan’s English education system is being pulled apart by three opposing forces. Bilingual Nation 2030 pulls students toward English and global communication. Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness pulls them toward digital judgment, verification and AI-mediated work. But Taiwan’s old exam culture pulls them back toward memorization, grammar drills, timed reading and correct answers. If the education system keeps using old exams to define success, it risks producing graduates who are neither genuinely bilingual nor genuinely AI-ready, but trained for tasks machines can already perform. The first force is Bilingual Nation 2030. Launched in 2018, the policy aimed to “help Taiwan’s workforce connect
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
June 1 to June 7 "If all Taiwanese were as afraid of dying as you, then what would happen?” Physician Shih Chiang-nan (施江南) reportedly said this to his wife Chen Chiao-tung (陳焦桐) after she urged him to stop intervening on behalf of Taiwanese soldiers stranded overseas after serving in the Japanese Army during World War II. Shih had clashed with high-ranking officials over the issue, engaged in several heated arguments with Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) and allegedly shouted at general Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), chief of staff of the Taiwan Garrison Command, over
“Taiwan’s Opposition Leader Comes to US With a Message Straight Out of Beijing” read a May 31 headline in the Wall Street Journal. Top US administration officials and members of Congress almost certainly read the WSJ, and if there was a bullet point takeaway that people in Washington should absorb ahead of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chair Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) arrival in DC on June 9, that headline is it. The last few columns have discussed this very topic, and the timing is not coincidental. While those top officials likely do not read the Taipei Times, judging by the number
RSS