Oliver Stone is exhausted and a little out of his gourd. He just turned in the final print of his epic dream project, Alexander (it was more or less pried from his hands), and, truth be known, he isn't sure he has succeeded in telling the story of the man he calls "history's greatest
idealist."
PHOTO COURTESY OF FOX MOIVIES
"We tried," the 58-year-old filmmaker says wearily from his hotel room, rubbing his face in his hands, his longtime girlfriend, Chong Son Chong, and their nine-year-old daughter, Tara, hanging out in the suite's bedroom, patiently waiting for him to be done.
PHOTO COURTESY OF FOX MOIVIES
Will Stone ever be done with Alexander? It's a question that lingers heavily in the air following the months he has spent editing the half-year's worth of footage he shot last year and early into 2004 in Morocco, London and Thailand. Stone's Alexander has gone through three major cuts, whittling a good 45 minutes from first edition to last, forcing Warner Bros to delay its release from early November to Thanksgiving. (The line from the studio: The later date will be better for Oscar campaigning.)
Finding a cut everyone can tolerate, much less like, has been problematic. For some, the film is -- take your pick -- too violent, too gay, too confusing. Much of the violence and overt homosexuality that was present in Stone's first cut has been excised.
It has made little difference. When Alexander was first screened for US film writers, the reaction to the now two-hour, 55-minute movie was so bad that MSNBC gossip columnist Jeannette Walls ran a story with the headline: "Early viewers stone Alexander."
`TOO BIG FOR LIFE'
Stone knew it would be a nightmare to make a movie about Alexander the Great, the Macedonian king who conquered the Persian Empire and spread Greek culture (while ruthlessly destroying everything and everyone in his path) into the Middle East and Egypt, before contracting malaria, dying and leaving a beautiful corpse at age 32 in 323 BC.
Unlike, say, Julius Caesar, Alexander's story has been little told either on stage or screen. (Robert Rossen's sluggish 1955 film with Richard Burton as Alexander is an exception.) That Alexander had proved so elusive intrigued Stone, who traces his interest in the ancient conqueror to a class he took in Greek mythology in 1969 at New York University's film school.
"Possibly he's too big for life," Stone muses about why so few dramatists have taken a stab at Alexander. "People want more ordinary. Too famous, too known, too successful, too much. I don't know. He's sexually ambiguous. He's a thorny character. He has mother-father issues. He has sexuality issues ... but 'issues' evokes a modern sense of problem awareness."
"The biggest problem," Stone continues, "is that he lived a five-act life, at least. There were 50 battles. We started thinking about this movie in 1989, but I could never solve the script. We finally brought it down to three acts. That was my problem. People talk about the competition with this other film. My mind was always on the prize, which was the script."
A DIRECTOR'S VISION
That "other film," an Alexander biopic from director Baz Luhrmann (Moulin Rouge) and producer Dino De Laurentiis was but one of several Alexander-related projects being discussed at the beginning of the 21st century. Mel Gibson had plans to produce a miniseries for HBO. Producer Moritz Borman calls casting Farrell a "giant leap of faith."
This would also explain signing Angelina Jolie to play Olympia, Alexander's tempestuous mother, a decision that Paul Cartledge, professor of Greek history and chairman of the classics faculty at Cambridge University, calls an "absurdity." Jolie is 29; Farrell, 28.
"It was weird," Jolie says of first considering the idea. "But I read the script and really connected with her. There was something mysterious and dark. Putting the age aside and Colin aside, I understood her and felt I was the right woman to play her. Is it believable? We tried."
THE GREAT IN BED
Though it's hard to move beyond the strange casting, stranger accents, Stone's trademark scenes of animalistic sex and drunken bacchanals, the blood-soaked battles, the strange contrast between Farrell's dancing, dark eyebrows and his feathery, platinum hair and the coy depiction (by Greek standards) of Alexander's bisexuality (a line early in the film sets the tone: "It has been said that Alexander was never defeated except by Hephaistion's thighs"), there is some great, teeming history in Stone's film.
However, the director is just not sure if anyone who doesn't have some background in ancient history is going to be able to figure it out.
"There were scenes we had to recut, shorten or simply take out," he says. "It's there if you're careful and observant."
Says Farrell: "Look, Alexander wanted to achieve immortality, and look at us -- we're talking about him here, 2,500 years later."
"Sadly," Farrell continues, "all some people want to focus on is that this is a `gay movie.' It's not hidden. But it's not hit on the head, either. I think there's just enough of an out for those who can't handle it, for some people to be able to say (doing a caveman voice), `No ... that's not. Do you think? I don't think they were ...' And then for those who want to go in with open minds and open eyes and an open heart, there's enough to know that certain things might have been going on that weren't shown on camera."
Stone knows his movie isn't going to be the last word on a controversial figure who's viewed by many historians as a destroyer who didn't care a whit about spreading Hellenism. He burned Persepolis, the capital of the Persian Empire, wiping out many sacred books in the process. He leveled Thebes, crucified those who resisted him and engaged in wholesale slaughter when invading new areas.
All true, says Stone. But there's more. And the man who made JFK, Nixon and Born on the Fourth of July, no stranger to having his cinematic interpretations parsed and dissected, isn't afraid of taking a view many see as romantic and contrarian.
"People see Alexander in starker terms: conqueror, tyrant, bloodthirsty vs. generous visionary," Stone says. "But they miss the larger issue. The Hellenic world did spread."
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
The following three paragraphs are just some of what the local Chinese-language press is reporting on breathlessly and following every twist and turn with the eagerness of a soap opera fan. For many English-language readers, it probably comes across as incomprehensibly opaque, so bear with me briefly dear reader: To the surprise of many, former pop singer and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ex-lawmaker Yu Tien (余天) of the Taiwan Normal Country Promotion Association (TNCPA) at the last minute dropped out of the running for committee chair of the DPP’s New Taipei City chapter, paving the way for DPP legislator Su
It’s hard to know where to begin with Mark Tovell’s Taiwan: Roads Above the Clouds. Having published a travelogue myself, as well as having contributed to several guidebooks, at first glance Tovell’s book appears to inhabit a middle ground — the kind of hard-to-sell nowheresville publishers detest. Leaf through the pages and you’ll find them suffuse with the purple prose best associated with travel literature: “When the sun is low on a warm, clear morning, and with the heat already rising, we stand at the riverside bike path leading south from Sanxia’s old cobble streets.” Hardly the stuff of your
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist