The author of this collection of opinion columns from the Chinese-language Taiwan Daily News is also the associate editor in chief at the Taipei Times. I therefore wondered whether I'd experience any conflict of interest in reviewing his book. But the problem didn't arise. This is a forceful, trenchant, but also discerning and well-informed piece of work that makes admirable, enjoyable, and frequently informative reading.
Laurence Eyton describes himself as "a European liberal democrat with the world view that this implies," and elsewhere as "a natural conservative." In the context of Taiwan, with which all these essays deal, these positions translate into a championing of the right of the Taiwanese people to self-determination, a distrust of the current Beijing authorities, and a particularly dismissive attitude to the KMT past and present (certain individuals in certain of their actions excepted).
Over and above everything else rides high the idea that for four decades after 1945 Taiwan was effectively a KMT colony, and that the party's dream of a Republic of China on the island has led to all the paradoxes and psychological problems that colonial status
everywhere produces.
I couldn't help thinking of possible headlines my editors might write for this review -- "John Bull stands up for Taiwan" was the one that came to mind. And there is no doubt that Eyton is in the tradition of such English writers as William Cobbett, Samuel Johnson (at least as portrayed by James Boswell) and Winston Churchill. He has a quick nose for humbug, is a ready champion of the underdog, and will stand no nonsense, least of all from the current KMT/PFP leadership.
Many topics are covered, but several guiding principles can be identified. First is that territories elsewhere in the world provide useful parallels for Taiwan in its current situation as a post-colonial society. Next come beliefs, following naturally from the perception of the island's formerly colonial status, that the idea of Taiwan as a unique repository of Chinese traditions is false (Taiwan has its own distinctive and multi-ethnic traditions), that the KMT has got off lightly from its crimes during the White Terror era (other countries have put their guilty men on trial or instituted truth and reconciliation commissions), and that Taiwan needs to come to terms more fully with its past if it is to proceed painlessly into the future.
Among Eyton's other characteristic positions are that international ignorance of Taiwan is profound, that former president Chiang Ching-kuo (
The flavor of the book is distinctive. Eyton never minces his words -- indeed, he tells how he nearly lost his job over an editorial he wrote after the 9-11 attacks. In one passage, for instance, he refers to "that loathsome KMT party song that is still the National Anthem," contemplates the possibility of turning the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial into "something less contemptible" and boycotting the NT$200 bill, and longs for the removal from his local park of "that damned statue" (of Chiang Ching-kuo).
It's small wonder, then, that he had thoughts of packing up and going back to England, his collection of English teapots included, should the pan-blues have won the presidential election (the book came out a few days before the poll). But these aren't electioneering pieces -- the discernment based on the author's knowledge of history, with the many different models it contains (even Greenland and Latvia get a mention) sees to that. Nevertheless, once you've read these strong-minded pages it isn't hard to identify their author's style on occasion in the editorial columns of this newspaper.
There are many fascinating incidental insights. World War I began because emotion was allowed to prevail over reason, Australia is a model of a territory that has successfully shaken off the burden of its history, Canada's strong trade links with the US don't mean the places ought to unite, the former mainlanders here are like the English used to be in Ireland, and so on. It's things like these that prevent this from being merely a partisan work. Though there is never any doubt where Eyton stands, this remains a rational and cogently argued statement. Even so, it would probably be fair to say that in essence it represents the fundamental DPP position.
Yet the book is no party program -- there are individual views on almost every page. There are criticisms of pan-green tactics, for instance on the referendum law. The author would have loved to have found the ancestral China with its gentleman scholars the KMT dreams of, but instead found the real Taiwan. The fourth nuclear power station should have been stopped earlier, but now should probably go ahead. And there are honorable reasons for supporting -- "one China" -- even if Eyton doesn't share them.
There are home truths, too, several derived from George Orwell (the two chapters on Orwell's views of nationalism are particularly fine). One is that people support teams or nations to feel better about themselves, another that colonial powers have to despise those they colonize in order to justify their colonialism, a third that the penalty Taiwan has paid for peaceful change is that the old regime remains a power in the land. There are many more.
There is one last point. Eyton apologizes for the fact that he crafted these essays with the aim of making their meaning clear for translation into Chinese. But what an excellent discipline this has proved! Clarity is exactly what marks them, with the result that they're intensely readable. The book's cover looks at first sight as if the text, actually bi-lingual, is in Chinese only. But don't be put off -- find it and read it. Love it or hate it, you're sure to find it an invigorating tonic.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
A fossil jawbone found by a British girl and her father on a beach in Somerset, England belongs to a gigantic marine reptile dating to 202 million years ago that appears to have been among the largest animals ever on Earth. Researchers said on Wednesday the bone, called a surangular, was from a type of ocean-going reptile called an ichthyosaur. Based on its dimensions compared to the same bone in closely related ichthyosaurs, the researchers estimated that the Triassic Period creature, which they named Ichthyotitan severnensis, was between 22-26 meters long. That would make it perhaps the largest-known marine reptile and would