For 10-year-old schoolgirl Paola Muschette, the story of Panama's struggle for independence 100 years ago is straightforward.
"Our Panamanian patriots overthrew Colombian oppressors in November 1903, as US forces stood by to keep enemy troops from invading," she quotes from her history textbook. "Our patriots gave the US permission to build the Panama Canal."
But as Panama celebrates its centenary as a nation this year, many academics say that version of history is nothing but a legend and that the truth is less heroic.
PHOTO: REUTERS
As never before, local historians are challenging the official account of how Panama gained its independence, forcing Panamanians to question their national identity and raising the ire of the establishment.
"It's hard for people to accept, but Panama was created for profit," said Ovidio Diaz, a US-educated lawyer and author of How Wall Street Created a Nation. The book, published in 2001 in English, was recently translated into Spanish and is causing controversy in Panama and Colombia.
Money talks
According to Diaz, Panama was wooed away from Colombia by a Wall Street syndicate, led by financier J.P. Morgan that secretly paid US$3.5 million for the failed French canal construction concern in Panama, which went bankrupt in 1889.
With the acquiescence of US president Theodore Roosevelt, the syndicate bribed Panamanian politicians and Colombian generals into declaring the new state of Panama. This allowed the US to take over the French project and build its own canal linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans without interference, said Diaz.
"After the Panama uprising, the syndicate sold the US government the French canal shares for US$40 million," said Diaz, who spent years trawling through forgotten journalistic and congressional accounts of US efforts to build the Panama Canal in the early 1900s.
Colombia ruled what is today Panama after independence from Spain in 1821, but historians are often split over whether Panama's break with Bogota was the result of a genuine separatist movement or just due to US interference.
Some older Colombians still lament the loss of Panama 100 years ago. Relations between the two countries today are cordial but Panamanians see Colombia's drug trade and guerrilla war as a source of instability in the region.
Historians agree that Colombia, which had granted the rights to the failed French canal effort in the 1880s, made life difficult for the US in early 1903, asking huge sums of money in annual rent to build a canal on Colombian land.
Roosevelt, who was dedicated to forging a US-built canal in Panama, was frustrated by the lack of progress, saying he had a "mandate from civilization" to build the canal.
But from there on, history is open to interpretation.
According to Pulitzer prize-winning US historian David McCullough, Panamanians did revolt against Colombia on November 3 1903, with the only casualties being one man and a donkey on the Panamanian side.
On Nov. 6 at 12:51pm, only 70 minutes after the official cable reached the US announcing the Panama uprising, Washington recognized the Republic of Panama.
Panamanian historian Olmedo Beluche says Panama's independence was a sham because, "There's no evidence of any separatist movements in Panama," even after independence from Spain and Panama's inclusion into Greater Colombia in 1821.
In the zone
Under the Hay-Bunau Varilla treaty, the US won the rights to build an inter-oceanic canal, as well as consent to govern a 16km-wide area through the heart of Panama, known as the Canal Zone.
The zone, run from 1903 until it was dismantled in 1977, was operated under US federal laws. The US returned the canal to Panama on Dec. 31, 1999.
While the zone was under US control, Panamanians had no free access to the area, while black and white canal workers were segregated under a caste structure.
Juan David Morgan, a Panamanian intellectual who supports the view of a genuine independence struggle, says the canal zone was the price Panama had to pay for its freedom.
"Panama tried to cede from Colombia throughout the 19th century but could never defeat Colombian forces. US support was the only way to achieve emancipation," said Morgan.
The debate leaves ordinary Panamanians vexed, mostly preferring to believe the traditional view of their history.
But many agree Panama, home to 2.8 million people, needs to reconsider its identity this year.
"There are questions we need to answer," said 22-year-old student Enrique Lara. "Is Colombia our enemy or our ally? And, now the United States has handed back the canal and left, what opposing force is there to unite us?"
In the mainstream view, the Philippines should be worried that a conflict over Taiwan between the superpowers will drag in Manila. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr observed in an interview in The Wall Street Journal last year, “I learned an African saying: When elephants fight, the only one that loses is the grass. We are the grass in this situation. We don’t want to get trampled.” Such sentiments are widespread. Few seem to have imagined the opposite: that a gray zone incursion of People’s Republic of China (PRC) ships into the Philippines’ waters could trigger a conflict that drags in Taiwan. Fewer
March 18 to March 24 Yasushi Noro knew that it was not the right time to scale Hehuan Mountain (合歡). It was March 1913 and the weather was still bitingly cold at high altitudes. But he knew he couldn’t afford to wait, either. Launched in 1910, the Japanese colonial government’s “five year plan to govern the savages” was going well. After numerous bloody battles, they had subdued almost all of the indigenous peoples in northeastern Taiwan, save for the Truku who held strong to their territory around the Liwu River (立霧溪) and Mugua River (木瓜溪) basins in today’s Hualien County (花蓮). The Japanese
Pei-Ru Ko (柯沛如) says her Taipei upbringing was a little different from her peers. “We lived near the National Palace Museum [north of Taipei] and our neighbors had rice paddies. They were growing food right next to us. There was a mountain and a river so people would say, ‘you live in the mountains,’ and my friends wouldn’t want to come and visit.” While her school friends remained a bus ride away, Ko’s semi-rural upbringing schooled her in other things, including where food comes from. “Most people living in Taipei wouldn’t have a neighbor that was growing food,” she says. “So
Whether you’re interested in the history of ceramics, the production process itself, creating your own pottery, shopping for ceramic vessels, or simply admiring beautiful handmade items, the Zhunan Snake Kiln (竹南蛇窯) in Jhunan Township (竹南), Miaoli County, is definitely worth a visit. For centuries, kiln products were an integral part of daily life in Taiwan: bricks for walls, tiles for roofs, pottery for the kitchen, jugs for fermenting alcoholic drinks, as well as decorative elements on temples, all came from kilns, and Miaoli was a major hub for the production of these items. The Zhunan Snake Kiln has a large area dedicated