“Taiwan’s defense is Japan’s defense” — look at a map and it is hard to think otherwise, and Beijing would agree.
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has said that it would take Taiwan — by force if necessary. Take Beijing at its word.
However, that does not mean that it will succeed. Not if the price is too high — and the certainty of US and Japanese military involvement on Taiwan’s behalf puts things into the “too expensive” category.
Tokyo either helps Taipei defend itself or sits by and hopes that Taiwan does not come under Chinese control. If it is the latter option, Japan had better prepare to give Beijing a near veto over its military, political, economic and even domestic policies.
Japan just might also need to relinquish parts of its southern territory — starting with the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan. Why so dire?
Taiwan occupies strategic geography — sitting in the middle of the sea lanes through which much of Japan’s energy supplies and trade flow. Take Taiwan, and China can cut these whenever it wants.
Forget about “going around” the South China Sea. A PRC-controlled Taiwan would be a springboard for Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) naval and air operations into the heart of the central Pacific.
Japan’s southern defenses in the Ryukyu Islands are outflanked. Expect increased pressure in the East China Sea — and the Diaoyutais — and eventually a push to take the Ryukyus.
The knock-on effects are as frightening. Japan would only operate in Southeast Asia and elsewhere at Beijing’s sufferance. Japan’s regional influence would wane as partners draw back under Chinese pressure.
Even worse, the loss of Taiwan would deliver a body blow to the US’ position and prestige in Asia. Smaller regional nations would scramble to cut the best deal possible with the PRC.
That is bad news for a Japan that relies on the US to underwrite its defense. The days when Tokyo could rely on the US to “take care of” Taiwan are over, and Taiwan cannot survive on its own. The US is overstretched and needs the help Japan can provide with Taiwan. Indeed, the more Japan does, the more likely it is that the US will defend Japan.
With the US gone or staggered after Taiwan falls, Japan would face the near-impossible task of building up the Japan Self-Defense Forces to handle the PLA — and would need to “go nuclear.”
However, would Japan’s public not oppose military ties with Taiwan? The Japanese government might be surprised.
Opinion polls routinely show that large majorities with negative opinions of the PRC and its behavior. Japan’s public understands national security better than the politicians.
Still, there are the excuses for doing nothing: Can Japan not just let Taiwan go and cut a deal with China? It can.
However, Beijing breaks its promises, and there is not a shred of evidence Beijing will settle for “co-pre-eminence” in Asia along with Tokyo. It is incapable of regarding Japanese as equals.
Indeed, Chinese policy is as much a desire to put Japan “back in its place” and teach it a lesson for savaging China in the 20th century as it is about geopolitics.
Then there is the old standby: Certainly China would not upset its important economic relationship with Japan, would it?
Anybody care to take that bet? Economic ties have not much restrained Chinese behavior in recent times.
Just take the past decade: constant pressure around the Diaoyutais, a rare earth boycott, periodic “riots on demand” against Japanese companies in China, taking Japanese hostages for political reasons and nonstop anti-Japan propaganda. (Just watch Chinese TV some evening).
With Taiwan back in the fold it would be no holds barred for Beijing against the Japanese “dwarves.” That is Beijing’s word, not mine.
Japan’s business class would of course complain about upsetting economic ties. However, Japan Inc is about making money, not defending the nation. Listen to the Japan Business Federation and Japan would have surrendered a long time ago.
So forget about economic ties leading to peace in our time. More likely true is the adage that “the more willing and ready you are to fight, the less likely you will have to.”
Defense ties with Taiwan are a prerequisite.
What would defense cooperation between Tokyo and Taipei look like? Something that breaks Taiwan’s isolation and demonstrates Japan’s support (along with the US’) for Taiwan.
Start by exchanging liaison officers and, working with the Americans, cooperate in the humanitarian assistance/disaster relief field, making use of each nations’ amphibious forces.
It is easy to get the Republic of China Air Force and the Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF) together on Guam for joint training. Navies can train anywhere.
Invite Taiwan to participate in missile defense activities and North Korea sanctions enforcement operations and have JASDF fighters from Okinawa (along with US Air Force aircraft) join the Taiwanese air force on missions when PLA aircraft fly around Taiwan looking to intimidate.
Ultimately, this is all about principles. Taiwan is an economically successful model of consensual government and individual liberty, just like Japan.
This is anathema to Beijing. It cannot justify the authoritarianism of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) when there are competing examples of stable Asian nations.
For Japan’s own sake, Taiwan is worth defending. Turn away with eyes primly averted while a free people are enslaved and Japan will, at the very least, deserve contempt and even might be next. Tokyo can bet that the communist dictatorship that wants Taiwan will be coming after it in short order.
Japan still sees itself as the leading nation in Asia. If it is afraid of deepening defense ties with a free Taiwan for fear of Beijing, it might as well step into the back seat and let the CCP drive.
Grant Newsham is a retired US Marine Corps officer and is a senior research fellow at the Japan Forum for Strategic Studies.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US