The preservation of Gonghe New Village (共和新村) in Pingtung County’s Donggang Township (東港) is probably the most complicated among the nation’s reconstruction projects for military dependents’ villages.
In July 2018, 41 buildings in the village, which were built as dormitories for military officials during the Japanese colonial era, were granted cultural heritage status and listed as “historical buildings” by the Pingtung County Government’s cultural assets review committee. That meant all buildings should be kept, but the villagers who had not moved out were still not satisfied.
The Taipei Times on July 27 that year quoted resident Wang Li-hao (王立皓) as saying that the international understanding is that “a cultural heritage site should cover an entire cultural entity, which includes residents who have lived on a site for many years; it should not just refer to buildings.”
Wang was not particularly happy about the decision, because listing the buildings as cultural assets meant that the eviction of residents would continue.
With fourth generation residents now living in the village, Wang said that gaining cultural asset status to prevent the buildings from being demolished was just the first step, and that there was still a long way to go to before they could fulfill their ultimate wish — to spend their final years in the house where they were born.
Soon after the end of the Lunar New Year holiday last month, Wang expressed concern about a lawsuit filed by the Ministry of National Defense against the village’s community development association, demanding that the land and property be returned. A second court session is to be held next month.
Wang said that during a recent out-of-court mediation, the ministry’s lawyers took a tough stance.
The association is located in the village’s class-1 dorm building, which was damaged by fire a dozen years ago.
It was the association that raised funds and repaired the building, and although official documents about the project were exchanged between residents and the military at the time, the military did not provide a single cent for the restoration, Wang said.
This is a matter of difference in understanding between the government and the implementation of laws on one hand, and residents and expectations on the other. The question is if it would be possible to reach a compromise and find a solution that satisfies both parties.
There were also protests at Jianye New Village (建業新村) in Kaohsiung’s Zuoying District (左營), but the Jianye residents achieved better results. At the time, resident representatives came to me for advice, and I suggested that they reach an agreement with the government that once the land and buildings have been returned, the government should sublet the houses to tenants, who should also be responsible for maintaining them.
Under the agreement, the original residents should have priority to rent the houses, and they should pay the rent on time and fulfill their obligation to maintain the properties.
In April last year, the Kaohsiung City Government approved the applications of seven households in Jianye for certification allowing them to be operated as bed and breakfasts. I have not inquired whether my advice had any influence over this decision.
The preservation of former military dependents’ dorms should not be disconnected from the idea of repurposing and revitalizing the area. The three parties involved — the ministry, the local government and residents — need to sit down and talk, put themselves in each other’s shoes and join efforts to come up with a solution that satisfies the greatest public interest. This is the way to create benefits for all.
For instance, the local government could act as the mediator between residents and the ministry by offering the ministry another parcel of land in exchange. On the other hand, residents could try to add value to the tourism industry and become a “golden goose” for the local government, while academia could lend a hand in establishing the village’s cultural and historical significance.
The most essential element of the revitalization projects is money. Money can be raised by civic groups, outstanding second-generation residents and public representatives. Looking at it this way, the preservation of Gonghe New Village is not a matter between residents and the ministry, but a collective issue that affects everyone.
Miao Cheng-hsi is an assistant professor who grew up in a military village.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US