The COVID-19 outbreak in China, known to many as Wuhan pneumonia, has yet to be contained, and there are various guesses as to when that will happen. Some investors optimistically expect it to clear up by the end of this month, while US President Donald Trump has predicted that it would “go away” in April.
However, Vice President Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁), who is an epidemiologist, has said that people might have to learn to live with COVID-19, as they do with other contagions, such as influenza.
Another consideration is that to calculate the extent of the epidemic’s impact, one would also have to guess China’s attitudes, determination and capabilities. Uncertainty is a major bane of economic development, and China and the virus are both unpredictable variables.
The typhoons that visit Taiwan every year often destroy bridges, houses and fertile fields. While the loss of income caused by reduced harvests and production has a negative effect on economic scale, it might not necessarily cause the nation’s annual GDP to fall.
Collapsed bridges, houses and so on that were built in the past do not count toward the current year’s GDP. Post-disaster reconstruction can sometimes spur economic growth, while delayed consumption can often make up for a temporary decline in demand.
Epidemics are somewhat different. The damage they cause is to human lives, while the fear they cause has a longer-lasting effect of discouraging people from going out, leading to slower activity in businesses such as travel, restaurants, movies and other services. Epidemics deter both consumption and investment.
The SARS outbreak in 2003 had a heavy impact on Taiwan’s economy in the second quarter of that year, with private consumption contracting — a rare occurrence for this nation.
Overall, the economy slumped 1.15 percent compared with the same quarter of the previous year. It also compared poorly with the preceding and following quarters, which both saw year-on-year growth rates of 5 percent, or the 5.85 percent growth seen in the fourth quarter of 1999, when the 921 Earthquake struck, and the more than 7 percent year-on-year growth in the quarters preceding and following that one.
Human life is priceless, but medical resources, such as reagents, medical instruments and hospital wards, all come at a price, as does the training of medical personnel. All these things need money. The more rigorously the nation prepares now, the less of a loss it is likely to suffer. However, government budgets are not unlimited, so one cannot avoid weighing up the costs and benefits when deciding policies.
The establishment of disease-control capabilities must therefore be planned from an economic aspect. The losses that can potentially arise from disasters provide an important rationale for expanding the nation’s disease-prevention and control capabilities.
The relation between health and wealth has long been a topic of academic research. Generally speaking, there is a positive correlation between the two. Countries with higher life expectancies are generally those that have higher GDP per capita.
A comparison between two major disasters — SARS and the 921 Earthquake — shows that the heavy economic impact that can arise from a viral outbreak justifies the cost of raising the nation’s ability to prevent diseases.
COVID-19 is caused by a novel coronavirus whose characteristics, survivability and mode of transmission are not yet clear. China is a big country where information transparency is lacking. As with SARS 17 years ago, so it is with the current outbreak.
Other countries can only obtain information that Beijing is unable to suppress. Aside from making it hard to keep track of the outbreak, this also makes it harder to estimate economic risks. These difficulties are a test of the progress Taiwan has made in disease control over the past 17 years.
Epidemics and natural disasters all come to an end sooner or later. The duration of their effect depends on what that impact entails. For example, the Black Death had a deep impact on England, causing its population to stagnate for a long period in the 14th and 15th centuries.
In Taiwan’s case, even though its economic development got back on track following the last few outbreaks of contagious diseases, it had little or no economic growth while the outbreaks were happening. Notably, the survival of some and the death of others had an impact on financial markets and led to a redistribution of wealth. Although the economy seems to always recover, it will never return to what it used to be before the outbreak.
Over the past few weeks, the public’s main concern and topic of conversation have been about masks, with a shortage posing a direct challenge to the administration’s ability to govern.
In this extraordinary period, apart from investing NT$200 million (US$6.58 million) to build mask production lines, the government could also consider working in concert with market forces to resolve the shortage.
It could use a “twin-track system” whereby, as well as requisitioning masks made by existing factories and selling them through a rationing system, it could set a higher, but still reasonable upper price limit that would offer sufficient incentives for manufacturers to quickly purchase equipment to boost production.
Supply and demand decides what will happen to the masks. When the market price goes up, supply will naturally increase, thus meeting the demand. In terms of economics, when buyers are willing to pay a higher price, it implies stronger demand and that goods will be put to the best possible use.
If there is a temporary shortage of a strategic commodity, such as masks or consumer goods in general, more can be produced. The nation needs to prepare solutions to problems before they happen.
The idea that “health is wealth” is as true of the nation as it is of the individual. Thanks to the experience of SARS, the Ministry of Health and Welfare has been able to deploy resources more calmly on this occasion.
If the nation were, unfortunately, attacked by yet another contagion in the future, let us hope that it can be managed in a more orderly manner.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past