Presidents, prime ministers and chancellors across Europe were packing their bags this week in preparation for a long weekend in Brussels. However, they will not be taking in the baroque majesty of the Grand Place or savoring the local culinary treats.
Instead, they will be preparing for that most infamous of events, a “four shirter,” to use the clothes-packing gauge adopted by male diplomats to measure the length and horror of EU leaders’ summits in the Belgian capital.
The thorny subject this time around? Money. And the problem? The UK.
The UK’s withdrawal from the EU has left a huge 75 billion euros (US$80.95 billion) hole in the bloc’s budget for the next seven years, from next year to 2027.
“And now we are fighting like ferrets in a sack,” one EU diplomat said with a sigh.
Covering items ranging from agricultural subsidies to science programs and the EU’s efforts to combat the climate emergency, the new multi-annual financial framework (MFF) needs to be agreed by the leaders and an increasingly unpredictable European Parliament before the end of the year.
Without agreement, everything risks grinding to a halt in just nine months’ time, including the flow of cohesion funds, the cash dedicated to supporting the poorest member states.
Budget discussions in Brussels are always rancorous affairs, but this one is of a different order: Everyone will have to pay more. No one wants to.
EU capitals were expected to be bristling for a fight when they arrived in Brussels yesterday for the first day.
Ominously for the diplomatic corps, an end date for the summit has not been fixed, but four days of talking are on the cards.
There are two main rivals in the budget battle.
On one side are those who proudly describe themselves as “the Frugals” — the Netherlands, Austria, Sweden and Denmark (although there are some concerns within the camp that the new Austrian coalition government, being a bit Green now, has been lost to them, and that the Swedes are going soft).
As the biggest net payers, the Frugals have been insisting on a budget of no more than 1 percent of the EU’s gross national income.
The European Commission’s initial proposal was for 1.1 percent — about 1.25 trillion euros over the seven years.
Then there are the “Friends of Cohesion” (FoC).
“The Friends of Corruption, you mean?” spat one EU diplomat from a Frugal state.
The 15 under the FoC flag are the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Estonia, Croatia, Malta, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Lithuania, Latvia, Romania, Portugal and Greece.
The Frugals say that the commission’s 90 billion euros in cuts to agriculture and cohesion funding are not enough.
The FoC say they are being unfairly targeted and that the richer countries should cough up some more, setting up a battle between east and west.
The debate is all the more toxic as the commission has proposed that cohesion funds should also, in the future, be conditional on member states respecting the rule of law.
It is a red rag to the bulls in the nationalist governments of Hungary and Poland, which are already in a battle with Brussels over their judicial reforms, among other issues.
Then there is France and Germany. Berlin’s main concern is that it does not come out of it looking worse than the French.
In Paris, the government just worries about how much cash is going to go to its farmers, one senior EU official said.
The fragmentation of the national debates leaves it impossible to say what will happen, a second official said, with even Irish politics in turmoil following the election that has made Sinn Fein Ireland’s second-largest parliamentary party.
Going in to the summit, European Council President Charles Michel, a former prime minister of Belgium, has been engaged in furious shuttle diplomacy around the capitals.
Michel has put forward an alternative proposal for the budget to be 1.074 percent of the bloc’s gross national income (1.094 trillion euros) in an attempt to split the difference between the warring camps.
“In this negotiation, we are not expecting member states to be happy, but the degree of dissatisfaction will be key,” a senior EU official said.
“No chance,” a Frugal diplomat said. “There is not a lot to say, except we won’t pay. And as the Rolling Stones song goes: Time Is On My Side.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95