Nationality is absolute
A recent editorial discussed flag burning, the impact this can have in communities and the privilege or right to perform such an action within a nation-state (“Beware closing doors to free speech,” Feb. 16, page 6).
The editorial started by citing University of Malaysia researcher Helen Ting, who wrote that the concept of a nation is “a mental construct,” and national identity is “a dynamic, contentious historical process of social construction.”
Ting went on to say that citizens of nations conceive of a “figured world of nationhood,” then fashioned it as “only one of many figured worlds that constitute the self.”
This all strikes me as post-modern/deconstruction theoretical babble, and ignores realities of nationhood that are important in everyone’s lives.
It is all related to Benedict Anderson’s Imagined Communities (also referred to in the editorial), which, while in some ways is a useful concept, misses the bar of what nationhood and nationality actually are.
That is, my nation — my “community” if you will — is not some sort of mental construct, pie-in-the-sky, floating-in-air, abstract, make-believe concept for me.
I live in my community, I exercise my rights there, interact with my neighbors, contribute locally, work, play and relax there. It is not some fictional “construct,” much less a “figured world.” It is the real thing.
It is indeed “conspicuous” in my life and in my heart, creating a sense of pride (low key in its way), and I see myself very much as a flesh-and-blood American, with all that that means (“Taiwan a ‘city on a hill’ for Asia,” April 2, 2019, page 8).
The editorial then looks at flag burning, proper. At the highest level, I can understand how this seems offensive to some people, but I would not in the least endorse banning it, as such an action — as has been said in major court rulings in the US Supreme Court — is protected free speech.
The editorial then claims that the flag represents “group memberships and strong emotional attachments,” and further, embodies “the soul of a society in terms of symbolic representation of national consciousness.”
I do not disagree that flags are strong symbols, and in a sense represent a nation’s core values, but these ideas in the main veer into more psycho-gibberish.
We Americans do not walk around all day pondering the stars and stripes, and just how they symbolize the original 13 colonies, the 50 states, valor, purity, perseverance and justice. Yes, I had to recite the Pledge of Allegiance every morning in school as a child, but that eventually drifted away, and the flag did not linger in my mind every day of my life.
I do not think I, or anyone I knew, was seeing red, white and blue all day; we were not “waving the flag” at every opportunity. There were realities to attend to, processes that included actual rights and privileges, which I enjoyed and practiced every day — not a world of red, white and blue symbolism and “constructions,” that which is imagined, fancied or veritably fictionalized.
The editorial concludes by stating: “There is no definitive answer as to whether people should be allowed to desecrate national symbols.”
This may be true, but there is a definitive answer to what it means to be a citizen of a nation.
This might be “one of many figured worlds,” but it is the one that really matters in our lives.
In this world, we are representatives as it were, believers in values, Aborigines and commoners, subjects of a greater body politic, voters and delegates, and emblems of a nation, our community, states and commonwealths.
The commonwealth — here is a concept that anything but imagined, it is lived, it is acquiesced to and abided by, it is breathed, it is actuated. That is, anything but “imagined.”
David Pendery
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.