Following Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) dramatic victory in January, it seems appropriate to look ahead to 2020 (though alas, not with perfect vision!) and consider where relations with the United States might trend. At the same time, we need to consider reactions from the mainland to President Tsai’s convincing win, retaining as well — albeit with a slightly smaller margin — the DPP’s majority in the Legislative Yuan.
First, let us congratulate President Xi Jinping (習近平) on his central role in the DPP’s victory. Polls early last year suggested a rather different outcome, but Madame Tsai focused on good governance, nursing the Taiwan economy to a solid performance despite Beijing’s attempts to punish the island. The drop in mainland tourism may have hit certain sectors of the economy, although enhanced trade with the US and Asian neighbors effectively offset that factor.
The most striking factor assisting Tsai’s party was the harsh and clumsy Chinese handling of Hong Kong during the course of the year. Xi Jinping gets the lion’s share of credit for this policy, since as supreme ruler for life, all important policy decisions lie with him. Tsai’s triumph was also evident in local elections that were dominated by pro-democracy (also by definition anti-CCP) candidates presenting a surprisingly strong showing.
The KMT has some serious soul-searching ahead of it as it considers the future. Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) not only was trounced in the Presidential balloting, but now faces a recall movement from Kaohsiung citizens alienated by his reneged promise to concentrate on their concerns after his election to the southern city’s leadership a year ago.
President Tsai can continue to rely on solid support from the United States, spearheaded by Congressional leaders, state governments, and a White House that has — if somewhat haphazardly — shown support for the democratic people of Taiwan even as it continued a trade war with the mainland. I won’t go into the political implications of the newly emerged coronavirus now sweeping the mainland, other than to note that this will not be good for its economy.
Assessing PRC internal politics is a fraught occupation, but it does seem Xi Jinping has entered into some rough waters. One wonders how long the heretofore docile Politburo will continue to support Xi’s imperial ambition to reign sovereign for the rest of his life, effectively denying any of them a chance at the top job.
Meanwhile, independent assessments suggest the economy was slowing even before the coronavirus erupted. We all have to hope this new contagion will quickly subside, given the threat it poses throughout the region and perhaps globally. In sum, this looks like a rocky year for mainland politics. So long as all this does not lead to new aggression against Taiwan, it could even bring a respite in cross-strait tension.
The recent trend of Taiwan industry returning from the mainland should be welcomed. Trade with Taiwan’s neighbors might be a collateral benefit of China’s economic slowdown, as the government’s Go South policy continues to focus on enhanced relations with the economies of ASEAN as well as South Asia.
America is beginning its protracted political season. The primary election in my home state of New Hampshire was on February 11. A number of Democratic candidates have viable paths to the White House as they face a wounded and unpopular President. But November’s elections are still a long way off.
Suffice it to say that the raft of Democratic candidates — while no doubt suspicious of China and inclined toward supporting Taiwan — are not really focused on the cross-strait question as they seek a path to the White House. That said, I remain confident the basic support for our Democratic friends there will be reflected in the policies any Democratic president would bring to office next year.
Meanwhile President Trump has waxed soft and hard on China, seeking trade deals while authorizing arms sales and solid defense ties with Taipei. John Bolton’s departure from the administration means the loss of a longtime friend of Taiwan, but there are other kindred souls in Washington’s executive and legislative bodies.
The Trump Administration has spoken up on behalf of Taiwan as Beijing threatens its remaining diplomatic partners, and Washington will continue to do so, with strong Congressional support. The US does have influence with some of these countries, but China also has been assiduous in wooing them with financial and diplomatic inducements.
Mr. Xi might choose to go after some of the remaining fifteen countries that retain formal diplomatic relations with Taipei. However, this can only go so far. Meanwhile, as I have long argued, the real core of Taiwan’s international support is more centered on the informal, but robust commercial and people-to-people ties with such stalwart friends as the US, Japan, ASEAN and South Asian countries.
The coronavirus epidemic has unmasked Beijing’s churlish attitude toward health issues in Taiwan, given its unwillingness even to permit data from the World Health Organization (WHO) to be shared with the island. It also appears to be triggering the first real political crisis for strongman Xi, who has appeared indecisive and more interested in covering up the facts than addressing this serious health challenge. One only hopes that Xi will not try to distract attention from his own mismanagement by concocting another cross-strait crisis.
American politics is in flux, as the Democratic Party tries to find the best candidate to challenge Trump this fall. But whoever emerges as the winner in November’s presidential election, Taiwan can count on solid bipartisan support from the Congress. Hopefully this will include further advanced arms sales to counter China’s ongoing effort to intimidate Taipei.
In sum, there are risks and opportunities for our Taiwan friends as 2020 unfolds. Still I remain generally confident. The island has weathered much worse. Its economy is in solid shape. Its partnership with America continues to be the surest guarantee against Beijing bullying. It has a sound political system and a leader who is experienced in dealing with the mainland. Taiwan is going to be just fine!
Ambassador Stephen M. Young (ret.) lived in Kaohsiung as a boy over 50 years ago, and served in AIT four times: as a young consular officer (1981-’82), as a language student (1989-’90), as Deputy Director (1998-2001) and as Director (2006-’9). He visits often and writes regularly about Taiwan matters. Young was also US Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan and Consul General to Hong Kong during his 33-year career as a foreign service officer. He has a BA from Wesleyan University and a PhD from the University of Chicago.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS