Fabric curtains stretch across the huge Warragamba Dam to trap ash and sediment expected to wash off wildfire-scorched slopes and into the reservoir that holds 80 percent of untreated drinking water for the greater Sydney area.
In Australia’s capital, Canberra, where a state of emergency was declared Jan. 31 because of an out-of-control forest fire to its south, authorities are hoping a new water treatment plant and other measures will prevent a repeat of water quality problems and disruption that followed deadly wildfires 17 years ago.
There has not yet been a major effect on drinking water systems in southeast Australia from the intense fires that have burned more than 104,000km2 since September last year, but authorities know from experience that the biggest risks are to come with repeated rains over many months or years, while the damaged watersheds, or catchment areas, recover.
Due to the size and intensity of the fires, the potential effects are also not yet clear.
“The forest area burned in Australia within a single fire season is just staggering,” said Stefan Doerr, a professor at Swansea University in Wales who studies the effects of forest fires on sediment and ash runoff. “We haven’t seen anything like it in recorded history.”
The situation in Australia illustrates a growing global concern: Forests, grasslands and other areas that supply drinking water to hundreds of millions of people are increasingly vulnerable to fire due in large part to hotter, drier weather that has extended fire seasons, and more people moving into those areas, where they can accidentally set fires.
More than 60 percent of the water supply for the world’s 100 largest cities originates in fire-prone watersheds — and countless smaller communities also rely on surface water in vulnerable areas, researchers have said.
When rain does fall, it can be intense, dumping a lot of water in a short period of time, which can quickly erode denuded slopes and wash huge volumes of ash, sediment and debris into crucial waterways and reservoirs.
Besides reducing the amount of water available, the runoff can also introduce pollutants, as well as nutrients that create algae blooms.
What is more, the area that burns each year in many forest ecosystems has increased in the past few decades, and that expansion is likely to continue through the century because of a warmer climate, experts have said.
Most of the more than 64,000km2 that have burned in Victoria and New South Wales have been forest, including rainforests, scientists in New South Wales and the Victorian government have said.
Some believe that high temperatures, drought and more frequent fires might make it impossible for some areas to be fully restored.
Very hot fires burn organic matter and topsoil needed for trees and other vegetation to regenerate, leaving nothing to absorb water. The heat also can seal and harden the ground, causing water to run off quickly, carrying everything in its path.
That can clog streams, killing fish, plants and other aquatic life necessary for high-quality water before it reaches reservoirs.
Already, thunderstorms in southeast Australia in the past few weeks have caused debris flows and fish kills in some rivers, while fires continue to burn.
“You potentially get this feedback cycle,” where vegetation cannot recolonize an area, which intensifies erosion of any remaining soil, said Joel Sankey, research geologist for the US Geological Survey.
The role of climate change is often difficult to pin down in specific wildfires, University of Melbourne researcher Gary Sheridan said.
However, he said that the drying effects of wildfires — combined with hotter weather and less rainfall in much of Australia, even as more rain falls in the northern part of the country — mean that “we should expect more fires.”
Climate change has affected areas such as Alaska and northern Canada, where average annual temperatures have risen by about 2.2°C since the 1960s compared with 0.88°C globally.
As a result, the forested area burned annually has more than doubled over the past 20 to 30 years, Doerr said.
Although there might be fewer cities and towns in the path of runoff in those areas, problems do occur. In Canada’s Fort McMurray, Alberta, the cost of treating ash-tainted water in its drinking-water system increased dramatically after a 2016 wildfire.
In the western US, 65 percent of all surface water supplies originate in forested watersheds where the risk of wildfires is growing — including in the historically wet Pacific northwest.
By mid-century almost 90 percent of them are likely to experience an increase — doubling in some — in post-fire sedimentation that could affect drinking water supplies, a federally funded 2017 study found.
“The results are striking and alarming, but a lot of communities are working to address these issues,” Doerr said.
“It’s not all doom and gloom, because there are a lot of opportunities to reduce risks,” said Sankey, who helped lead the 2017 study.
Denver Water, which serves 1.4 million customers, discovered “the high cost of being reactive” after ash and sediment runoff from two large, high-intensity fires, in 1996 and 2002, clogged a reservoir that handles 80 percent of the water for its 1.4 million customers, said Christina Burri, a watershed scientist for the utility.
It spent about US$28 million to recover, mostly to dredge 765,555m3 of sediment from the reservoir.
Since then, the utility has spent tens of millions of US dollars more to protect the forests, partnering with the US Forest Service and others to protect the watershed and proactively battle future fires, including by clearing some trees and controlling vegetation in populated areas.
Utilities also can treat slopes with wood chips and other cover and install barriers to slow ash runoff. They purposely burn vegetation when fire danger is low to get rid of undergrowth.
Canberra’s water utility has built in redundancies in case of fire, such as collecting water from three watersheds instead of two, and it can switch among sources if necessary, said Kristy Wilson, a spokeswoman for Icon Water, which operates the system.
Water can be withdrawn from eight different levels within the largest dam to ensure the best-quality water, even if there is some sediment, she said.
That is paired with simpler measures, such as using straw bales, sediment traps and booms with curtains to control silt, and physically removing vegetation around reservoirs and in watersheds to reduce fire fuel, she said.
Eventually, some communities might need to switch their water sources because of fires and drought. Perth, on the western coast, has turned to groundwater and systems that treat saltwater because rainfall has decreased significantly since the early 1970s, Sheridan said.
However, for now, millions of people will continue to drink water that originates in increasingly fire-prone forests.
An article on the Nature magazine Web site reports that 22 scientists last month wrote to the daily Dagens Nyheter criticizing Sweden’s no-lockdown response to COVID-19. However, evidence-based analysis shows that a lockdown is not a one-size-fits-all strategy and Sweden is showing the world a sustainable way for everybody to fearlessly live with the virus, which is an inevitable situation that everyone must face and accept for a while. The biggest myth about lockdowns is that they are the only solution when an epidemic worsens. A lockdown is a measure to cordon off a seriously affected area so that people in
On Monday, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) spoke during the opening ceremony of this year’s World Health Assembly (WHA). For the first time in the assembly’s history, attendees, including Xi, had to dial in virtually. Xi made no acknowledgement of the Chinese government’s role in causing the COVID-19 pandemic, nor was there any meaningful apology. Instead, he painted China as a benign force for good and a friend to all nations. Except Taiwan, of course. The address was a reheated version of the speech Xi gave at the 2017 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Xi again attempted to step into the
China’s prevention of Taiwan’s participation as an observer at the World Health Assembly (WHA), the WHO and other UN specialized institutions is misleading the world. China always asserts that UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 established the so-called “one China principle,” in which Taiwan is a province of China. This is fake information that is part of China’s grand external propaganda strategy. Resolution 2758 made clear that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the sole legitimate representative of China at the UN and its specialized institutions. However, there is not a single word related to Taiwan in the resolution, no mention of the