From Republicans’ effort to get the US Supreme Court to overturn Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 ruling that established a woman’s right to an abortion, Poland’s increased restrictions on access to emergency contraception, to Brazil’s clampdown on sexual health education, this is a difficult time for women, but if the global feminist movement has proved anything over the years, it is that it can overcome powerful resistance to defend the rights of marginalized groups.
This year, it will do so again.
The challenge is formidable. An inevitable corollary of the authoritarianism, ethno-nationalism and xenophobia embraced by political leaders in many nations — in particular Brazil, Hungary, India, Turkey and the US — is the perpetuation of regressive gender norms.
“Strongman” leaders such as Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi say that women are born to be wives and mothers; immigrants, and racial, religious and ethnic minorities are dangerous and inferior; and LGBTQI+ persons deserve ostracism, detention or even death.
These leaders have emboldened people who share their views to engage in discrimination and violent attacks against racial or other minorities, migrants, women and other marginalized groups.
Through measures like restrictions on abortion and contraception, and the removal of protections for LGBTQI+ people, these leaders have sought to control people’s bodies, sexuality and reproduction, and punish those who defy their outdated beliefs.
For example, immediately upon entering the White House, US President Donald Trump reinstated the “global gag rule,” which, by barring US aid to any international organization that provides, refers or advocates for abortion care, is deadly for women.
Yet, as president of the International Women’s Health Coalition and a longtime women’s rights advocate, I have seen firsthand what the feminist movement can do.
Consider Argentine feminists’ fight against highly restrictive abortion laws.
Twenty years ago, at the UN, Argentine diplomats refused even to acknowledge sexual health or reproductive rights, but in 2005, Argentine feminists launched the National Campaign for the Right to Legal, Safe and Free Abortion, beginning a grueling uphill battle against powerful adversaries.
In 2018, hundreds of thousands of activists took to the streets across the nation wearing green handkerchiefs (now a global symbol of the fight for abortion rights) to demand that the Argentine Senate pass a bill legalizing abortion.
They lost, but only narrowly — an outcome that would have seemed impossible just a couple of decades earlier — but they kept fighting.
Last month, the nation inaugurated Argentine President Alberto Fernandez, who has vowed to legalize abortion.
Achieving social change to protect marginalized groups is never an easy process. There are no quick victories over weak opposition, but as feminists have proved time and again, with sustained commitment, changes that once seemed impossible can later seem inevitable.
In the past year alone, there have been numerous examples of such changes. The Mexican state of Oaxaca and the Australian state of New South Wales decriminalized abortion, as did Northern Ireland, while others liberalized their laws, expanding the circumstances in which women can access safe, legal abortion services.
In April last year, the South Korean Supreme Court struck down the nation’s abortion law as unconstitutional, setting the stage for decriminalization this year.
Beyond abortion, Taiwan, Austria, Ecuador and Northern Ireland all legalized same-sex marriage last year.
Moreover, in a striking shift of political power, Finland elected Sanna Marin, a 34-year-old woman, as prime minister. Women now lead all five political parties comprising the nation’s governing coalition, and four of them are under the age of 40.
Advocates for women’s rights are committed to making this year at least as important a year in the global fight for equality, not only for women and girls, but for all people.
In India, for example, women are leading protests against a new citizenship law that discriminates against Muslims.
Particularly inspiring are the young female and non-binary activists who are leading movements for transformative change. For example, Emma Gonzalez is demanding gun reform in the US; Bertha Zuniga is defending the land rights of Honduras’ indigenous people; while Jamie Margolin and Greta Thunberg have emerged as leading climate activists.
This year marks the 25th anniversary of the UN Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, which recognized women’s rights as human rights and established gender equality’s place on the global agenda.
Since the platform’s creation, activists have used it to hold governments to their commitments on a wide range of issues, including maternal mortality, child marriage, gender-based violence, political participation and reproductive rights.
Feminist activists will continue this work at the Beijing+25 Generation Equality Forum, convened by Mexico and France, in Mexico City in May and Paris in July.
There, they will call for bold new commitments to address crosscutting challenges such as climate change and the refugee crisis.
This broader perspective is vital. Feminists must strengthen their alliances with other progressive movements, especially those fighting for environmental sustainability, racial justice and LGBTQI+ rights.
Only by mobilizing and supporting one another’s agendas can we overcome white supremacist, heteronormative, patriarchal and exploitative forces to build a more just, equitable and sustainable world.
The effects of these efforts will be shaped by decisions made by citizens and policymakers.
The US presidential election in November will be particularly consequential. For better or worse, the US has an outsize impact on how the rest of the world addresses issues ranging from climate action and foreign aid to diplomacy and human rights.
If Trump loses the election, the US could again set a positive example, reviving multilateral cooperation, renewing support for UN agencies working on health and human rights, and ensuring that key government and judicial posts are once more occupied by qualified individuals who support human rights and the rule of law.
Whatever happens, one thing is certain: The feminist movement and its progressive allies will not give up.
Francoise Girard is president of the International Women’s Health Coalition.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers