For almost two months, an unassuming white house on Magnolia Street in Oakland, California, was home for Dominique Walker and her family.
Her one-year-old son, Amir, took his first steps in the living room.
He said his first words there, too: “Thank you.”
Illustration: Constance Chou
Walker’s daughter, Aja, celebrated her fifth birthday in the house.
“We made it a home,” 34-year-old Walker said.
They made it their home when they entered the vacant structure on Nov. 18 last year with the intent to stay, knowing full well that they neither owned the house nor had an agreement to lease it.
Yet a city grappling with a housing crisis that has priced out far too many cannot afford to allow houses such as the one on Magnolia to sit vacant, Walker said.
In Oakland, more than 15,500 units are vacant, while 4,071 people are homeless, US Census Bureau data showed.
“This is bigger than me, than this one house,” Walker said. “I never thought I would be in this position, but this is the new face of homelessness. It doesn’t look like what people think homelessness would look like.”
In the early hours of Tuesday morning, sheriff deputies rolled up to the white house on Magnolia Street, where hundreds of Walker’s supporters had gathered, knowing that eviction was imminent. Two other homeless mothers staying in the house, as well as two supporters, were arrested.
Walker planned to be there when the deputies arrived, but was in an interview when they battered down the front door. She and other organizers had made sure beforehand that the children had somewhere else to stay during the chaos.
In the aftermath, Walker was teary and tired, but just as resolute as she has been throughout the process.
When she and her family took possession of that house, they did so not just for themselves, not just for other homeless families like them, but to spark a movement — a movement that their supporters believe will be the next civil rights movement of our time: housing as a human right.
“I feel like I should be standing with my sisters, but I’m standing right here for them right now,” she told reporters outside the house. “This movement is just beginning.”
Walker’s story has become far too common in the Bay Area . She has deep roots in Oakland, with her grandparents moving from Arkansas and Mississippi to make the city their home. After growing up there, she left for Tougaloo College in Mississippi in 2004, where she earned a degree in sociology and met the father of her children.
When their relationship fell apart, and she found herself having to flee domestic violence in April, she looked toward Oakland, toward home, only to find there was no one left.
Like so many others in the community, her family had been priced out, leaving for places such as Vallejo, Sacramento, Antioch and Stockton.
She got a job in Oakland organizing for the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE), but no place to stay.
“I was sleeping at a family member’s house in Stockton, commuting from Stockton to Oakland every day, and bringing the kids to daycare in Berkeley,” she said. “We tried another family member in Antioch, and it didn’t make much of a difference. The commute was even worse.”
Walker tried some city programs that gave her vouchers for hotels and attempted to get into a rental assistance program that ended up having its funding cut. At the same time, she began to realize that the issue extended beyond her.
Everywhere she turned, she felt like she saw homeless encampment after homeless encampment.
In the work she did with ACCE, people kept handing her forms with the address section left blank, sometimes crossing it out to write “homeless.”
“This is not the Oakland that I left, the Oakland that I grew up in,” she said. “I didn’t really understand the magnitude of what had happened since I left. My family would call and say, ‘I’m moving to Stockton,’ and I’d think, OK, it just got expensive. I didn’t realize we were in the streets with encampments like that until I came back.”
She joined up with other homeless mothers to form Moms 4 Housing, and they began looking for a vacant house.
California has a widespread vacant property problem. About 8 percent of all housing units in the state remain vacant, an estimated 1.2 million, according to the Census Bureau — although some of those units might be short-term rentals or market-rate apartments with no tenants.
Some blame the vacancy problem in part on Proposition 13, a 1978 ballot initiative that capped property taxes at 1 percent of the home’s value at the time of purchase and reduced total property taxes by 57 percent.
With such low property taxes, it is cheaper for some longtime owners and investors to let a property remain vacant while waiting for the market to come out in their favor.
Following the foreclosure crisis, in which Oakland was struck particularly hard, more than 10,000 homes changed ownership in the city, many in low-income neighborhoods, an Urban Strategies Council study said.
Of those completed foreclosures, 42 percent fell into the possession not of individual property owners, but of investors.
The house on Magnolia Street had sat vacant for more than two years, becoming an eyesore on the block, Moms 4 Housing said.
Wedgewood Properties, real-estate investment company in Redondo Beach, California, purchased it in July at a foreclosure auction for US$501,078. The company specializes in house-flipping — buying oftentimes foreclosed-upon houses cheaply, renovating them and then putting them back on the market for profit.
“Speculators” is the term that Moms 4 Housing uses — under the hashtag “evict the speculators.”
“We have a housing crisis that is being driven by speculators,” said Leah Simon-Weisberg, an ACCE attorney who represented Moms 4 Housing. “It’s created a fake market where people who have cash buy properties and then middle-class people can’t buy them.”
“They’re cheating essentially, because they’re not buying for housing, they’re buying to sell,” Simon-Weisberg said. “Then all these government programs can’t work. People can’t use [US Federal Housing Administration] loans because you’re always competing with people who will pay cash.”
Sometimes the foreclosed properties these speculators purchase have tenants. These tenants have rights, but more often than not when it is a company behind the purchase, the process becomes dirty. Wedgewood, for example, had three separate wrongful eviction lawsuits filed against it in San Francisco.
“They were a key player in the foreclosure crisis. We saw them over and over again harassing tenants, evicting tenants and doing it so they could make greater and greater profit,” said Aimee Ingliss, the power-building program director of Tenants Together.
“I personally found it ironic seeing a serial evictor like Wedgewood turn around and say to Moms 4 Housing: ‘Hey, you’re taking our property,’ when they were a key player in taking the property of black and brown people in Oakland and in other places,” Ingliss said.
Wedgewood has maintained that while it was sympathetic to the mothers’ plight, the house belongs to the company and this was “a straightforward situation of illegal break-in and illegal occupation,” company spokesman Sam Singer said.
He disagreed with the assertions that Wedgewood played a role in the current housing crisis.
“It’s a company that comes when other people have been foreclosed upon,” he said. “Wedgewood has nothing to do with the financial issues of the people whose homes they purchase. They show up like any other individual or company at a public auction and they put a bid on a property. Then through their investment and through their knowledge, they improve the neighborhood.”
“The reality is they’re a housing creator,” Singer said.
“These are homes that were previously occupied by people who could not make their payments. These were homes that were in bad states,” Singer said. “Wedgewood rehabilitates them and puts them back on the market.”
Yet back on the market for whom, is the question.
Throughout the neighborhood surrounding Magnolia Street, a smattering of houses stand out amid the Edwardians and craftsmans, not because of blight and disregard, but because of their overtly modern style.
Local residents throughout the Bay Area have become familiar with this sight: homes renovated out of place with the rest of their neighborhoods, with towering “gentri-fences,” the calling card of speculation.
Walker chuckled when asked about a neighboring house — the one with “the tall security gate.”
“It’s ridiculous,” she said. “It’s like they don’t want to be a part of the community, but they want to be here.”
The housing crisis has robbed her of more than just shelter for her family.
“Everything has changed,” Walker said. “I don’t know anybody on the street that I grew up on. There’s just no sense of community. All of the friends I went to high school with, they’re everywhere but nobody is here.”
“The gentrification that happened, not only are the people coming into our community, they’re also trying to change the culture.” she said. “They’re calling the police on churches, on drummers, and this is a part of the community. It’s just not the same.”
This is the movement, what Walker and Moms 4 Housing are fighting for.
In Oakland, 78 percent of the homeless population reported that their last place of residence before becoming homeless was within county limits; 70 percent were black.
“This is about people working, sometimes more than one job, and not being able to get into housing,” Simon-Weisberg said. “Or once they lose their rent-controlled housing, they just can’t get back in, and they get to this place because we have an unregulated housing market that is being manipulated by speculators.”
“It’s like when you have a war going on and you have war speculators and you have people charging 10 times for meat,” she said. “You don’t get to profit because there’s a war going on.”
Walker has been called a squatter, a thief, a criminal. She knows she broke the law in taking possession of the house on Magnolia Street.
“It doesn’t bother me when people say: ‘Oh, it’s criminal,’ because I know what the true crime is,” Walker said. “The true crime lies in this society that we live in that can normalize people living in the street. Shelter is a human right. It’s needed to protect yourself from the elements, and it shouldn’t be commodified.”
After a judge ruled in favor of Wedgewood last Friday, Walker held court on the steps of the house, speaking to the media.
“We are the blueprint for this movement and we are not going to stop fighting,” she said.
When a reporter asked if Moms 4 Housing was considering taking over other houses, she cooly responded: “I would encourage folks to do whatever they need to provide shelter for their family.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US