Taiwan was ranked 59th of 61 countries in the annual Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI) released by Germanwatch on Wednesday. Responding to the report, the Environmental Protection Administration said that the German organization’s evaluation did not account for varied national situations and development courses, and that it did not have access to Taiwan’s latest data on carbon sinks, greenhouse gas emissions, energy efficiency and renewable power, as it is not a UN member. Taiwan’s carbon intensity of 0.26kg of carbon dioxide emissions per US dollar is lower than the global average, it said.
Perhaps more questionable about the report is the comparatively high rankings awarded to China and India — two countries where reports emerge annually about extreme levels of air pollution. Germanwatch ranked China 30th. However, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post on Oct. 2 last year reported that a study by researchers from the Chinese University of Hong Kong found that PM2.5 — airborne particles of less than 2.5 micrometers — and ground-level ozone pollution cause an average of 1.1 million premature deaths in China annually. India ranked ninth, but Reuters last month reported that PM2.5 levels in New Delhi reached 500 on some indices on Nov. 3. High levels of pollution were not limited to India’s cities, but found throughout the country’s northern belt, Reuters said.
While the CCPI does not measure air pollution specifically, the UN Economic Commission for Europe says that poor air quality and climate change are closely linked. “Some air pollutants are also climate-relevant and thus known as short-lived climate pollutants (SCLPs), such as ground-level ozone (O3) and black carbon, a component of particulate matter (PM). When black carbon deposits on ice and snow, it causes local warming and increases melting,” its Web site says.
Tackling climate change is in everyone’s interest, but highlighting the environmental shortcomings of Taiwan and the US — which ranked last on the list — while overlooking those of two of the world’s largest contributors to climate change hardly seems helpful. It also smacks of political influence, particularly as India and China are UN members and two of the largest contributors to world economic growth. Of course, the US is also a UN member and one of the largest economic contributors, but the relationship between the administration of US President Donald Trump and the EU has been one fraught with complications.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Wednesday unveiled the European Green Deal. The commission has called it “the most comprehensive plan ever published to pull Europe out of the twin crises of austerity, and climate and environmental breakdown.” However, there has been opposition among European businesses to some of the proposed regulations, and critics have voiced concern that the plan would be directed at imports instead, effectively equating it to “protectionism.” That is why India and China need to be seen on paper to be team players on climate to avoid hefty tariffs.
The government must send the message to Europe that it is taking action on renewable energy and environmental protection. Perhaps it could be proactive and provide Germanwatch — which presents its reports at the annual UN Climate Change Conference — with more comprehensive data. It should also consider liberalizing the nation’s energy market, as the European Chamber of Commerce Taiwan suggested during the presentation of its annual position paper on Nov. 5, which said that the energy market must be deregulated “to allow multiple business models for the installation, sales and use of electricity generated from renewable energy sources.”
Taiwan has friends in the EU, but it must speak up for itself to avoid being hit with tariffs it cannot afford, particularly as it attempts to reduce its dependence on the Chinese market.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US