It is often said that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. It has that luxury, not being constrained by democratic transitions of power.
The prevailing wisdom is that, as far as the “Taiwan issue” is concerned, due to China’s increasing military strength and regional dominance, time is on the CCP’s side. This is true only if all other things remain unchanged. Both Taiwan and the US have committed themselves to maintaining the “status quo” for now, but change could come from other quarters, and not necessarily from the top down.
On Monday, a German Ministry of Foreign Affairs official rejected a petition initiated by a German national, Michael Kreuzberg, asking Berlin to formally recognize Taiwan. The reason, said Petra Sigmund, director-general for Asia and the Pacific at the ministry, was that such a move would run counter to Germany’s “one China” policy, which the ministry has no intention of changing.
This surprised nobody, least of all Kreuzberg, but there are still reasons to take heart from the process.
It was by no means certain the petition would be published at all. The Bundestag’s petitions committee had initially said it would not publish it on its Web site, as it risked causing “damage to international relations or intercultural dialogue” with China.
Kreuzberg responded to that rejection with an appeal, in which he wrote: “The Republic of China is without doubt a sovereign state” in which Taiwanese “freely practice democracy, in contrast to the PRC [People’s Republic of China], which is a one-party dictatorship.”
In an interview, he said: “I grew up in a dictatorship in communist East Germany. I know from personal experience what it means to live under one. The Stasi Secret Police persecuted me. So of course I have sympathy with Taiwan... I think the West should respond.”
Kreuzberg said he initiated the petition because he did not want his country to be responsible for democratic Taiwan being annexed by China’s authoritarian regime.
That, in a nutshell, is Taiwan’s predicament, its international reality. What seems to be a simple matter to the individual — Taiwan is demonstrably sovereign and independent, and Western democracies should support it over totalitarian regimes — is a diplomatic quagmire for states to negotiate.
Nation-states are required to sign up to Beijing’s deluded version of history, suspend their belief, and disregard international law and their own pretensions to protecting justice among nations.
It essentially comes down to a cold choice between profits and morals. If governments cleave to one or the other, they should account for their choice.
This is why the ministry did not want to discuss the issue in a public forum and why Kreuzberg was adamant that it does.
The rejection of the petition could be deemed a lost battle. Perhaps, but that does not mean the war is a lost cause. Something has been achieved.
Kreuzberg fought to have the petition published, and it quickly surpassed the signature threshold to require an official response, initiating debate in the German media about Taiwan’s plight in the face of China’s suppression and aggression.
Through the petition, Kreuzberg also compelled the German government to discuss the issue in a public forum.
Kreuzberg also said that the issue reportedly has support among politicians from several parties, despite the rejection, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union.
He said his next move is to take the petition to the EU, because if individual EU members, or the bloc itself, establish diplomatic relations with Taiwan, Germany might follow suit.
If they do, one could no longer argue that time is on Beijing’s side.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US