An economist says he was pushed out of his job at a Chinese bank in part due to his views on the effect of Hong Kong’s protests.
A brokerage employee in the territory is looking for a new job because she disagrees with her bosses’ politics.
An investment banker says he avoids talking to most colleagues about the unrest, fearing it might damage his career.
At financial firms across Hong Kong, personal political views that used to have little bearing on work are taking on new significance, as the territory’s pro-democracy protests harden opinions on both sides of the debate.
For some in the industry, it is making an already difficult business environment even tougher to navigate and fueling concerns about Hong Kong’s future as one of the world’s premier financial hubs.
The change is being felt most acutely at state-owned Chinese financial companies, where several backers of the protests say they fear retribution from superiors if they are found to attend rallies or otherwise support the pro-democracy movement.
Law Ka Chung (羅家聰), former chief economist at Bank of Communications (Hong Kong), has gone public with his concerns, saying on Tuesday last week that he suspects he was ousted in part because his research contradicted the Chinese government’s narrative on Hong Kong.
While global banks operating in the territory are more insulated from local politics, they are not immune. At BNP Paribas SA, a legal executive left the company in September to focus on activism after social media posts on his personal account led to the bank issuing a public apology.
In Citigroup Inc’s Hong Kong office, some pro-Beijing staff are now socializing less frequently with their pro-democracy counterparts, with the rift becoming more apparent in the wake of a widely circulated video of one of the firm’s investment bankers being arrested after a scuffle with police, employees familiar with the matter said.
The employees, who asked not to be named, as they were discussing a sensitive subject, emphasized that in most cases the differences of opinion have yet to get in the way of work.
When a JPMorgan Chase & Co banker from mainland China was filmed being punched during his lunch break after shouting: “We are all Chinese” at a crowd of yelling protesters, several employees complained verbally to their managers about his behavior, a person with knowledge of the matter said.
It is not clear from the video what initially sparked the confrontation, and there is no indication it was connected to his employer.
Conversations between some JPMorgan staff from mainland China and their peers from Hong Kong have become less frequent since the protests began, two people said.
For senior managers in Hong Kong’s financial industry — which accounts for about 20 percent of the territory’s GDP — the potential for rising workplace tensions adds to challenges that already include a sinking local economy and a pullback in dealmaking.
Banks have to find ways to accommodate employees with differing views without getting caught up in controversies that damage their brands, said Benjamin Quinlan, chief executive officer of financial services consultancy Quinlan & Associates in Hong Kong.
“Firms need to be much more clever about the way things are handled, carefully balancing free and open thinking while ensuring ongoing employee professionalism,” said Quinlan, a former executive at Deutsche Bank AG.
In response to questions from Bloomberg News, a Citigroup spokesman said that the US bank “values diversity and inclusion, which speaks to not just gender or ethnic diversity, but also diversity of thought. We respect people with different views and perspectives and our staff and clients respect that diversity too.”
A JPMorgan spokeswoman said that the firm’s employees “come from all walks of life and so many different backgrounds and continue to support each other.”
BNP declined to comment when the executive left in September, while BoCom did not respond to a request for comment.
Law, who spent more than 14 years at the Chinese bank, wrote in an August article that Hong Kong’s protests would worsen the territory’s slowdown, but that their effect was limited, a view that contradicted the dire outlook in China’s state-run media.
He was asked to leave the bank shortly after he shared with colleagues a link to an outside article critical of China’s firewalls and closed system, Law said.
He left behind a team of mainly local Hong Kongers.
“I wish them good luck,” he said in an interview.
Employees at other Chinese financial firms said that they have felt similar pressure to toe Beijing’s line.
Man, 25, who works in a back office at a Chinese brokerage in Hong Kong, said that her firm’s department heads have told employees that they will be fired if they participate in pro-democracy protests.
The company sends staff to pro-police rallies, which Man has attended even though she also takes part in pro-democracy protests without telling her employer.
While she wants to leave the firm, she is finding it difficult because most of the job openings she sees in Hong Kong are with mainland Chinese firms.
Like others who agreed to speak for this article, she asked to use only one name, because of the subject’s sensitivity.
Jason, who works at a Chinese investment bank in Hong Kong, said that most of the senior executives at his firm openly condemn the protests and are strongly supportive of Beijing.
Lower-level managers who have lived in Hong Kong for years tend to have a milder stance — supporting the right to demonstrate while condemning violence — whereas middle and back-office workers are typically Hong Kong locals who back the protesters, he said.
His views place him somewhere in the middle of the spectrum, Jason said.
Wary of offending someone on either side, he said he takes care to speak about the protests only with his closest coworkers when they are outside the office on cigarette breaks.
Another banker, surnamed Chan (陳), said that he is part of a small minority of pro-democracy employees at a Chinese securities firm.
Fearful of “whistle-blowers” who might out him to pro-Beijing managers, he keeps quiet when colleagues discuss the protests at lunch.
Some of his peers have been reported to high-level bosses in China for social media posts that contradict Chinese Communist Party messaging, he said.
Chan keeps his own posts on Facebook and WeChat free of politics, although he sometimes shares song lyrics that convey subtle messages of support for the pro-democracy movement.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers