When Lee White first visited the central African nation of Gabon, he believed he had found paradise.
White, 53, was not new to Africa, having moved with his parents from Manchester, UK, to Uganda at the age of three, but in Gabon, as a doctoral candidate in 1989, he had arrived in the second-most forested nation on Earth.
“Gabon is teeming with wildlife and beautiful rain forests,” White said in an interview in Johannesburg. “I fell in love, did my PhD there and never left.”
He became a Gabonese citizen in 2008, head of the national parks agency a year later, and in June he took over as the nation’s environment minister. Today, White is on the cutting edge of a drive backed by the UN to enlist preservation of forests in the fight against climate change.
His first victory came in September, when Norway signed an accord to pay the Gabonese government US$150 million if it can prove it is increasing its carbon stock — the amount of atmosphere carbon stored within the forest ecosystem — and cutting emissions over the next five years.
It was the first such agreement in Africa.
Norway also agreed to pay double the usual carbon storage price, US$10 for 1 ton (0.9 tonnes), compared with the US$25 a coal-fired power plant in Europe would pay for allowances that cover its carbon emissions.
“Preserving forests is the most cost-effective way of reducing carbon emissions and therefore fighting climate change, and because it’s cheaper to do it, people give it a lower value,” White said. “The fact that they doubled the price gives hope to other countries. It shows we are making headway in our discussions about the role of forests.”
The international recognition for Gabon’s conservation policies could encourage neighboring nations to follow suit, including the Republic of the Congo, White said.
Like Gabon, the Republic of the Congo’s forests are part of the Congo Basin, the world’s second-biggest rain forest after the Amazon, and the nation has experienced relatively low deforestation.
While the forest in the Congo Basin covers a third of the area of the Amazon, its trees are taller and bigger, meaning that it has half the biomass of the Amazon. That is key in determining how much carbon it absorbs, White said.
White’s appointment as minister and the Norway deal breakthrough came on the heels of a corruption scandal that prompted Gabonese President Ali Bongo to fire his vice president and forestry minister.
In February, customs officials seized large quantities of a protected rosewood in the port of Owendo. The wood, locally known as Kevazingo, is in high demand by Chinese furniture makers.
More than 300 containers subsequently disappeared from the port and authorities only recovered about 200 of them days later.
The Washington-based Environmental Investigation Agency also accused a major Chinese logging company of bribing officials to obtain vast concessions in the Congo Basin, overharvesting those concessions and evading taxes. After the report was published, the Gabonese government stripped the company — Deija Group — of its logging license.
Loggers have reason to be attracted to Gabon. Larger than the UK, it is almost entirely covered by tropical rain forest, has no highways and a population of 2 million, the majority of whom live in poverty.
Its shift toward conservation began under Ali Bongo’s father, former Gabonese president Omar Bongo, who died in office after 42 years in power.
Ali Bongo, who took office after violently disputed elections in 2009, has made forest and wildlife preservation a personal priority.
A year after taking office, he banned the export of unprocessed timber and then, four years later, he halted commercial fishing in almost a quarter of Gabon’s territorial waters. About a fifth of the nation’s landmass is set aside for conservation, a measure that has proved crucial to protecting its abundant wildlife — Gabon has 55 percent of the world’s remaining forest elephants and as many as 25,000 lowland gorillas.
That sets Gabon apart on a continent where illegal logging and slash-and-burn farming is devastating forests, and lack of rainfall is driving the Sahara desert toward the West African coast.
A surge in Chinese demand for tropical rosewood is wreaking further havoc across Africa.
Gabon has already cut its carbon emissions by 350 million tonnes over the past 15 years, White said.
“Gabon is certainly toward the front of the pack,” said Tony Knowles, director of Cape Town-based The Cirrus Group and a specialist on land-use aspects of climate change in Africa. “Over the last 10 years, especially since the Paris conference, there’s been a huge shift toward countries leading implementation themselves.”
Soon after White arrived in Gabon to study the impact of forestry management on wildlife, he found himself researching tree growth and carbon accumulation. The data he started compiling on a “rather clumsy” Excel spreadsheet formed the basis, many years later, for the negotiations with Norway.
The accord runs until 2025 and funding is to be disbursed on the condition that Gabon provides data on a regular basis proving it is reducing emissions or increasing the amount of carbon it sucks out of the atmosphere, White said.
In return, the government has to provide Norway with a portfolio of projects that preserve forests, such as reducing the impact of agriculture or requiring logging companies to harvest wood in a more sustainable way.
White is confident it will be a success.
“If we don’t manage our forests, they are going to disappear,” White said. “I would argue that a ton of carbon in the Democratic Republic of [the] Congo is worth a lot more than a ton of carbon from a Polish coal factory. My ton of carbon has all sorts of side benefits — it preserves gorillas and chimpanzees and elephants; it preserves the ecological function of the forest.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers