Almost six months after the protest movement that has upended life in Hong Kong began, the region is facing serious questions about its future as Asia’s leading international business center.
The most recent violence in the territory have been the worst disturbances of the six-month long pro-democracy protests. US lawmakers have passed legislation threatening Hong Kong’s special trading status and the territory has slumped into its worst recession in 10 years.
With next year shaping up to be even tougher, the protesters appear to have achieved the ambition expressed in a poster on social media this week.
Illustration: Louise Ting
“Squeeze the economy to increase pressure,” it said.
Trade and commerce is the lifeblood of Hong Kong, but it is bleeding badly.
The economy is expected to shrink by 1.4 percent this year, and economists think growth could wither by as much as 3 percent next year without a big fiscal stimulus.
The retail and tourism industries, which have thrived in tandem with Chinese visitors spending freely in the territory’s shops, are suffering particularly badly.
Visitors through the airport are down 13 percent and retail sales figures showed that they fell 18 percent in September compared with a year earlier.
The numbers were made more tangible last week when Hong Kong-based airline Cathay Pacific issued a profit warning for the second time in a month, blaming the turmoil in Hong Kong for a 35 percent decline in the number of passengers arriving in the territory last month.
On the same day, British luxury clothing company Burberry said that its Hong Kong sales were down more than 10 percent and it had slashed ￡14 million (US$18 million) off the value of its 12 stores there.
Even an international golf tournament was called off.
Yet although the leisure sector may have landed in the rough, the decision by the US Congress to pass the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act could represent a more significant long-term threat to the territory’s economic fortunes.
The bill has infuriated Beijing as an “intervention” in its affairs, but despite the delicate stage of US-China trade talks, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed the legislation because of its near-unanimous backing in Congress.
The bill means that the US would make an annual check that Hong Kong has sufficient autonomy from Beijing to qualify for the special US trading consideration that bolsters its status as a world financial center.
It also gives officials the power to levy sanctions against officials responsible for human rights violations in Hong Kong.
A second bill, which the US Senate also approved unanimously on Tuesday, would ban the export of certain crowd-control munitions to Hong Kong authorities.
George Magnus, former chief economist of investment bank UBS and now an associate of the London School of Economics’ IDEAS think tank, said that the legislation is potentially damaging for China.
“Hong Kong is China’s financial window on the world, and vice versa. The territory lends China capital, clout and kudos,” he said. “All of this is now at risk.”
The bills highlighted a growing feeling that Hong Kong’s autonomy is “deteriorating” and could persuade some firms to look for new accommodation in east Asia, the consultancy Capital Economics said.
“The bill itself would not directly reduce the territory’s international status unless other countries follow suit, but it could lead the large number of foreign firms operating in the city to increasingly focus their energy on other Asian financial centers with less uncertain outlooks,” Capital said this week.
Ben Bland, a research fellow at the Lowy Institute in Sydney and author of Generation HK: Seeking Identity in China’s Shadow, said that although Hong Kong remains a good place to do business, the passing of the US bill is a potential game-changer.
“There are the bigger black swan questions, especially after the US bill was passed. The risk increases that the US might withdraw the special privileges on trade access to the US,” he said. “If that did happen it would have a very, very damaging impact on the Hong Kong markets and business.”
Yet, Hong Kong, a key conduit for businesses into mainland China, is showing few outward signs of economic woes other than its poor GDP readings.
The local stock market, the Hang Seng, which is the fifth biggest in the world by value of the listed companies, has wobbled from time to time, but overall, it has lost only 2.2 percent since the protests turned violent in June.
Nor are there any telltale signs that wealthy residents are moving their cash out of Hong Kong, where property prices remain extremely high despite the turmoil.
Britain’s biggest company, HSBC, once the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corp, started life in the territory and it remains its biggest market, bringing in more than half of its US$20 billion pre-tax profits last year.
The territory also generates about 40 percent of the near-US$4 billion underlying profits of another large UK-listed bank, Standard Chartered.
Some of their more wealthy clients are understood to be opening foreign accounts in more stable places, such as Singapore, but so far the outflows are said to be limited.
The banks will certainly want to stand firm, to grow their Asian business, because it churns out higher returns than Europe and the US.
Standard Chartered admits it is “unrealistic” to think the protests will not hit its business.
Some of the lender’s business customers, such as local retailers, are particularly vulnerable.
However, HSBC interim chief executive officer Noel Quinn in October said that the bank’s commitment to the territory is unwavering.
“At different times throughout our 154-year history, both Hong Kong and the UK have faced significant challenges, and HSBC has done whatever we can to help them through to the other side. HSBC has always taken a long-term view and will continue to do so,” he said.
Yet with most experts agreed that Beijing will not back down and allow Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam’s (林鄭月娥) government to give concessions to the pro-democracy groups, it is hard to see how the situation can be resolved quickly and pull the economy back from a disastrous, prolonged recession.
Dan Harris, a lawyer at the Seattle firm of Harris Bricken who has done business in the region for decades, said that the ongoing protests mean Hong Kong is “no more” as an international financial center.
“It’s finished as an international business center because it was based on trust, safety and the rule of law and that’s all gone,” he said. “Companies are looking to leave. No one is thinking of moving in.”
He also believes that there is no appetite in Beijing to save the way Hong Kong is established. After all, it only accounts for 3 percent of the mainland’s economy, compared with 11 percent at the time of the handover from the British in 1997.
Harris thinks forceful intervention by the mainland is inevitable.
“There is no resolution to this. China does not care about Hong Kong,” he said.
“A lot of people in Beijing hate the place and they want to put it in its place. Who’s fighting for Hong Kong? Not many people,” he said. “China is not backing down because they want to send a message to Xinjiang and Taiwan.”
Despite its problems, Hong Kong remains resilient and had retained its flexibility and legal structure, said Andrew O’Neil, professor of politics at Griffith University in Australia.
Intervention, is unlikely because of the massive cost to Beijing, he said.
“But it’s still not certain. If you’d asked six months ago would the army intervene if there were battles in the street and the authorities losing control of infrastructure, then most would have said yes, but they haven’t, and a lot of people think that is significant,” he said.
“The question is how much more it has to escalate before the [Chinese People’s Liberation Army] intervenes?” he added.
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement