The Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) recently initiated an “only order what you can eat” policy to educate the public on limiting food waste. This is a praiseworthy initiative.
EPA data from last year show that the total volume of recycled food waste in Taiwan exceeded 590,000 tonnes. Filled in food waste recycling bins stacked on top of each other, they would be 13,500 times taller than Taipei 101.
Such a massive amount of food waste also increases the environmental cost. Ignoring the fact that about 2 billion people are still living in hunger, Taiwan’s food self-sufficiency rate is a mere 30 percent, which is low compared with other countries.
Furthermore, as farmland is declining due to the encroachment of factories and housing, Taiwan’s food self-sufficiency rate is expected to drop further. Under these circumstances, ensuring food safety has become a national security issue that must not be ignored.
In addition to moral persuasion, charging for food waste treatment is another strategy to reduce food waste. The waste treatment policy introduced more than 20 years ago divides garbage into three categories — recyclable resources, food waste and regular household waste.
With the exception of regular household waste that needs to be incinerated and requires a fee, there are no fees for recycling and treating recyclable resources such as containers and paper or food waste that can be used as fertilizer or pig feed.
During the two decades since the implementation of the policy, the public have been very good at following the regulations. In the past, food waste produced by restaurants was mostly collected by pig farmers.
After African swine fever broke out in China last year, Taiwan started to restrict the use of food waste as pig feed for disease prevention. Now, restaurant food waste has nowhere to go.
As a result of this ban, recycled kitchen waste can only be used as fertilizer. Although the production of green energy biogas through anaerobic digestion is an international trend, and is being pushed in several cities and counties in Taiwan, the biogas industry still has not taken off.
Now that food waste can no longer be used as pig feed, there must be a cost for composting or anaerobic digestion treatment.
Whether food waste recycling should continue to be free must be investigated, but one suggestion would be to establish a fee for food waste treatment just as there is for regular household waste.
Reducing waste at the source, treating it properly, and recycling and reusing it are the three major principles of waste treatment, and economic incentives are the most important policy tool.
Without the African swine fever outbreak, it would be reasonable not to charge for using food waste as pig feed because of its economic benefit. However, the times and environment have changed, and it is time to amend the policy.
Chen Wen-ching is a director of the Formosa Association of Resource Recycling.
Translated by Eddy Chang
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS