The results of a study by National Taiwan Normal University researchers announced on Wednesday found that Taiwanese use humor infrequently and that certain humor types are linked to mental capacity and well-being.
The researchers argued that humor could be learned and that Taiwanese should learn to use more of the “right type.”
While humor is inextricably tied to culture — another finding of the researchers — this does not imply that Taiwanese lack the capacity for humor. It abounds in Taiwan, with examples found in advertising, popular media and social media.
However, it is most often inoffensive (politicians excepted). For example, in a popular TV ad for beverage company Cha Li Wang (茶裏王), a man starts a new job and is told that he looks young by his female boss, who asks him: “How old are you?” The man replies: “I’m not sure!” with the implication that the beverage company’s tea has “rejuvenated” him and made him feel younger.
Taiwanese politicians are prone to humor in public, particularly sarcasm, which the researchers said was linked to “inferior mental capacity.” Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has claimed to have Asperger’s syndrome, has apologized for his often controversial statements. Recently, Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) compared President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and her running mate in next month’s presidential election, former premier William Lai (賴清德), to characters from the Chinese classical novel Water Margin (水滸傳). The characters, Wu Dalang (武大郎) and his wife, Pan Jinlian (潘金蓮), are known for being unequal, despite “sharing a bed.”
However, not all Taiwanese politicians use offensive humor. On Sunday last week, Minister Without Portfolio Audrey Tang (唐鳳) responded to a German reporter who said that Taiwan was a “breakaway province” of China by saying that “the breakaway was in the Neolithic age, I believe.”
Her deflection of a contentious description of Taiwan by interpreting it as a reference to the submergence of a land bridge between China and Taiwan during the ice age was spontaneous and perfectly timed. It was also humorous without being offensive.
The researchers argued that “self-defeating humor [is] seen as less detrimental in Taiwan than in the West,” because in “Chinese culture’s privileging of humility and interpersonal harmony” this form of humor is “positively linked to empathy, emotional reflection and emotional regulation.”
An argument linking self-deprecation with self-reflection is perhaps feasible, but it is context-specific at best. Self-deprecation is a mainstay of stand-up comedy in the US, where many comedians attack obvious aspects of their own identity as a key element of their routines. It would be unrealistic to argue that every one of these comedians suffers from depression. An argument could even be made that the positive feedback of making others laugh helps a good number of these comedians embrace their identities.
A more feasible association could be made between the “Chinese culture’s privileging of humility and interpersonal harmony” and the lack of aggressive humor in Taiwan. Taiwanese equivalents of comedians like George Carlin, Richard Pryor, Bill Burr and Chris Rock probably do not exist because it would be less socially acceptable to openly criticize groups or individuals in Taiwan.
There is also a different history of the struggle for emancipation in Taiwan than there was for minority groups in the US. That history in the US lends itself to unique comedy brands that thrive there.
Humor is alive and well in Taiwan, but if there is an area where more research is needed, perhaps it is in the use of humor in medical treatment. The researchers discussed humor and Asperger’s — perhaps other conditions could benefit from humor as well.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers