Nearly 31 years after the Tao of Orchid Island (Lanyu, 蘭嶼) first marched to remove the “evil spirits” — the nearly 100,000 barrels of nuclear waste placed on the island between 1982 and 1996 — from their homeland, justice is finally being served.
After an extensive investigation, the government has finally acknowledged the Tao had not given permission for a nuclear-waste storage site and on Friday last week, the Ministry of Economic Affairs announced that the community would receive NT$2.55 billion (US$83.6 million) in compensation.
When President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) visited the island in 2016, a Tao elder told the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) that government officials told the locals that they planned to build a pineapple cannery and asked the elders, who could not read Mandarin, to sign the documents allowing the nuclear dump.
Other versions say it was a fish cannery, but that is beside the point: No matter what the pledge was, the locals insist that they were kept in the dark.
Several studies have corroborated the claims. “The Mobilization of Orchid Island’s Anti-nuclear Movement” (蘭嶼反核廢場運動的動員過程分析) states that the government “never informed the Tao people of its plan and only started communicating with locals under public pressure.”
“A Study of Public Participation in Policymaking” (政策的制定與民眾參與之研究) said that “when construction started, nobody was clear on what was being built ... none would have guessed a nuclear waste facility.”
A statement on state-run Taipower Co’s Web site says that the Atomic Energy Council never used the word “cannery” and clearly stated from the beginning that it would be a nuclear waste storage facility in its reports to the Taitung County Government, which administers the island.
Developers also put up signs at the construction site specifying the nature of the project, Taipower said, adding: “The story that the Atomic Council tricked the people of Orchid Island into thinking that it was a cannery is just a rumor.”
However, it does not say whether anyone bothered talking to the villagers and whether they fully understood the implications of what was being built.
A report on Minister Without Portfolio Lin Wan-i’s (林萬億) investigation into the issue, released in December last year, does not mention any cannery either, but it does state that the decision to dump nuclear waste on the island was made in secret.
While the local government was informed about the plan as early as 1975, most residents knew nothing of it until construction began in 1980, and were indeed kept in the dark of its purpose until operations began in 1982.
Even then, Taipower officials tried to reassure residents that the waste was harmless.
The cannery story seems to have stemmed from miscommunication: The report says that locals were not allowed near the construction site — which renders the signs mentioned by Taipower useless — and came up with the idea that it was a cannery from what they gleaned from their conversations with construction workers and contractors.
Nevertheless, it was still a huge injustice to the Tao and the government is finally owning up to its mistake, continuing its work on transitional justice.
The next step, the report says, is to look into Taipower’s claim that the waste has not harmed the island’s residents, but if that is not the case, help them obtain better medical access.
While the compensation is a significant move, the ultimate goal is the removal of nuclear waste from the island, which has been delayed due to a lack of a permanent site. The long wait continues, but at least the people of Orchid Island can savor this victory.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past