Nearly 31 years after the Tao of Orchid Island (Lanyu, 蘭嶼) first marched to remove the “evil spirits” — the nearly 100,000 barrels of nuclear waste placed on the island between 1982 and 1996 — from their homeland, justice is finally being served.
After an extensive investigation, the government has finally acknowledged the Tao had not given permission for a nuclear-waste storage site and on Friday last week, the Ministry of Economic Affairs announced that the community would receive NT$2.55 billion (US$83.6 million) in compensation.
When President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) visited the island in 2016, a Tao elder told the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) that government officials told the locals that they planned to build a pineapple cannery and asked the elders, who could not read Mandarin, to sign the documents allowing the nuclear dump.
Other versions say it was a fish cannery, but that is beside the point: No matter what the pledge was, the locals insist that they were kept in the dark.
Several studies have corroborated the claims. “The Mobilization of Orchid Island’s Anti-nuclear Movement” (蘭嶼反核廢場運動的動員過程分析) states that the government “never informed the Tao people of its plan and only started communicating with locals under public pressure.”
“A Study of Public Participation in Policymaking” (政策的制定與民眾參與之研究) said that “when construction started, nobody was clear on what was being built ... none would have guessed a nuclear waste facility.”
A statement on state-run Taipower Co’s Web site says that the Atomic Energy Council never used the word “cannery” and clearly stated from the beginning that it would be a nuclear waste storage facility in its reports to the Taitung County Government, which administers the island.
Developers also put up signs at the construction site specifying the nature of the project, Taipower said, adding: “The story that the Atomic Council tricked the people of Orchid Island into thinking that it was a cannery is just a rumor.”
However, it does not say whether anyone bothered talking to the villagers and whether they fully understood the implications of what was being built.
A report on Minister Without Portfolio Lin Wan-i’s (林萬億) investigation into the issue, released in December last year, does not mention any cannery either, but it does state that the decision to dump nuclear waste on the island was made in secret.
While the local government was informed about the plan as early as 1975, most residents knew nothing of it until construction began in 1980, and were indeed kept in the dark of its purpose until operations began in 1982.
Even then, Taipower officials tried to reassure residents that the waste was harmless.
The cannery story seems to have stemmed from miscommunication: The report says that locals were not allowed near the construction site — which renders the signs mentioned by Taipower useless — and came up with the idea that it was a cannery from what they gleaned from their conversations with construction workers and contractors.
Nevertheless, it was still a huge injustice to the Tao and the government is finally owning up to its mistake, continuing its work on transitional justice.
The next step, the report says, is to look into Taipower’s claim that the waste has not harmed the island’s residents, but if that is not the case, help them obtain better medical access.
While the compensation is a significant move, the ultimate goal is the removal of nuclear waste from the island, which has been delayed due to a lack of a permanent site. The long wait continues, but at least the people of Orchid Island can savor this victory.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS