The 2,000 residents of Muhe, whose village was moved to higher ground a decade ago to escape the rising Yangtze River, have tried to make the most of their remaining land by planting orchards of oranges and persimmons along its banks.
With just 110 hectares on the edge of Asia’s longest river, Muhe lost half its territory to make way for the colossal Three Gorges Project, a 185m dam and 660km reservoir designed to control flooding, aid navigation and generate electricity.
Beijing has allocated more than 600 billion yuan (US$85.6 billion) since 2011 to alleviate the dam’s long-term effect on villages such as Muhe and bring the region’s deteriorating environment under “effective control.”
Yet many problems are still unresolved, and the government has promised to spend another 600 billion yuan by 2025, said Xie Deti (謝德體), a member of the Chongqing delegation of the National People’s Congress who lobbied the government to release more funds in March.
Protecting the Yangtze has become a priority for Beijing after Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) promised to end big and “destructive” development along the river, which stretches 6,000km from Tibet to Shanghai, supplies water to 400 million people and irrigates one-quarter of the country’s arable land.
Since Xi’s orders in 2016, local governments have dismantled dams, dredged plastic junk from the water, relocated factories, banned waste discharge and restricted farming and construction along the river.
“You can say we have undergone earth-shattering changes, especially when it comes to increasing our awareness of environmental protection,” said Liu Jiaqi, the Chinese Communist Party secretary in Muhe.
However, the region has been unable to evade the earth-shattering effect of the dam itself, which sits near two fault lines and has been blamed for a surge in earthquakes and the fragmentation of ecosystems, among myriad other problems.
The region saw as many as 776 earthquakes in 2017, 60 percent more than a year earlier, with the highest magnitude being 5, the Chinese Ministry of Ecology and Environment said.
The total number has risen significantly since the project began, with one study from the China Earthquake Administration showing a 30-fold increase between 2003 and 2009, when the reservoir was filled.
Xie, who is also a professor at Chongqing’s Southwest University, said that other challenges include algae blooms caused by fertilizer, and wastewater from tributaries polluting the river.
The government has long insisted the benefits of the dam outweigh the costs and disruptions, but in 2011, Beijing promised to spend 1,238 billion yuan by next year to try to fix them.
It pledged to raise living standards, heal the environment and create a long-term mechanism to prevent geological disasters.
However, less than half of the money had been spent by the end of last year, Xie said, adding that he had received assurances from Beijing that the rest would come between next year and 2025.
So far, farmland has been restored by dredging up submerged soil. Riverbanks have been strengthened and reforested to reduce landslide risks, and “ecological barrier zones” have been built along vulnerable parts of the river.
Yet one government scholar, who did not want to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue, said that the additional funding might not be enough to solve long-term problems.
Sediment accumulating near the dam threatens to undermine flood controls. A specialist research team has been examining the problem in the Three Gorges region for more than 30 years, and China has built two giant dams upstream to block silt.
The massive reservoir, which absorbs more heat than dry land, has also been blamed for increasing regional temperatures. Warmer water and the fragmentation of habitats have wreaked havoc on local fish stocks, with the Yangtze sturgeon close to extinction.
The dam has also caused water levels to dwindle at Poyang Lake, a habitat for the critically endangered Yangtze finless porpoise.
Since the dam was built in 2006, some leaders have distanced themselves from the project.
Former Chinese premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) openly criticized how it was built, and castigated officials for failing to take care of more than 1 million displaced residents.
During his visit to the Three Gorges last April, Xi berated officials for failing to clean up the “grim” environment of the Yangtze, and reiterated his pledge to end “big construction” on the river.
However, Xi also described the dam as a testament to China’s talent and self-reliance, saying it made him proud of its staff and his country.
“The issue is obviously very complicated, and it is not black and white,” said Ma Jun (馬軍), founder of the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, a non-governmental organization in China that tracks water pollution.
“It does have both flood control and power generation functions, but on the other hand, whether the cost is too high, whether there are alternatives, I think those are what we need to study,” Ma said. “For good or bad, the heyday of dams has passed.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US