The US Senate on Oct. 29 unanimously passed the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act. The legislation was introduced by US Senator Cory Gardner — chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity Policy — and designed to assist Taiwan in retaining its remaining diplomatic allies.
The TAIPEI Act requires US government departments to take steps to support the strengthening of Taiwan’s diplomatic ties and informal partnerships with Indo-Pacific region nations and the wider world.
If a country severs formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan, the act requires the US Department of State to conduct a review to determine whether an adjustment is needed in the US’ relations with that country.
The act instructs US government officials to use public statements, their votes and the influence of their office to provide support for Taiwan’s participation in the international community, and supports the US and Taiwan entering into bilateral trade negotiations and completing a mutually beneficial free-trade agreement.
The US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs on Oct. 30 gave the act its unanimous consent. At a committee meeting, Congressional Taiwan Caucus chair Steve Chabot said: “Taiwan is a critical ally in the Pacific and ought to be a role model for other nations across the globe.”
Chabot said that Taiwan fulfills all the criteria of a sovereign state and is an independent nation, and called on the US government to officially recognize Taiwan, adding: “It’s well past time that US policy catches up with these facts.”
US Representative Ted Yoho echoed Chabot’s statement, saying that it is time for the US to officially recognize Taiwan as a nation.
Once the act is passed by both chambers, any differences between the two versions of the bill would be worked out and it would be sent to the White House for US President Donald Trump’s signature, after which it would be enshrined into law.
Over the past few years, the Senate has passed a succession of Taiwan-friendly bills, such as the Taiwan Travel Act, which was signed into law by Trump last year.
However, the president and a number of government officials believe that these acts are merely an expression of the Senate’s opinion and are not legally binding. As a result, many of the Taiwan-friendly clauses within these laws have not been enforced.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) have praised Taiwan-US relations as being at their the strongest in four decades, but Wu is still blocked from visiting Washington on official business.
Wu thinks of himself as a great foreign minister, yet, putting political considerations aside, some US officials have privately said that he is stubborn and difficult to communicate with, and try to avoid getting embroiled in an argument with him.
Former US national security adviser John Bolton was the strongest advocate for Taiwan in the Trump administration.
Bolton subscribes to the position of former US president Ronald Reagan revealed in declassified memos about maintaining a military balance in the Taiwan Strait. In his role as national security adviser, Bolton promoted arms sales to Taiwan, but his proposals were obstructed within the Trump administration.
Bolton’s successor, Robert O’Brien, visited Taiwan prior to Tsai’s election in 2016. On his return to the US, O’Brien offered some advice, saying that Taiwan should increase its defense budget, join the now-defunct US-led Trans-Pacific Partnership — by resolving issues preventing the lifting of Taiwan’s ban on US pork imports — and secure a free-trade deal with the US.
O’Brien was very clear. The underlying meaning was that Washington views Taiwan as enjoying a free lunch by running a defense budget that equates to only 2 percent of GDP, which is unacceptable to both US Republicans and Democrats.
If Taiwan’s defense budget continues to be inadequate in the eyes of the Washington, there is a danger that the US could lose patience with Taipei.
In other words, O’Brien said that the US would continue to help Taiwan, but only if it helps itself. Taipei must live up to US expectations on defense spending; only then could it expect the US military to come to its rescue in the event of war with China.
Perhaps the Tsai administration would argue that it is unable to increase the defense budget due to other domestic priorities, but people in the US think that embarking on a massive program of infrastructure spending to extend the high-speed rail line to Pingtung and Yilan counties disregards Taiwan’s urgent national security situation.
Taipei counts on the protective umbrella of the US military as a sort of insurance policy, but the problem is that there is no such thing as free insurance. As everyone knows, if you want the insurance company to pay out, you have to pay the insurance premium every year.
If the Tsai administration wants to sign a free-trade deal with the US, it must face up to the reality that it will need to open up Taiwan’s market to US pork imports. The government cannot continue to avoid this issue — it must be resolved after the election.
Parris Chang is a former deputy director-general of the National Security Council.
Translated by Edward Jones
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US