President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on Sunday attended the launch of the Defend Democracy Safeguard Taiwan Alliance. The alliance, financed by Taiwan independence advocate Koo Kwang-ming (辜寬敏), is attracting people from the independence movement.
It is no coincidence that it was established just two months before the Jan. 11 elections: It aims to shore up support for Tsai’s re-election campaign not just in the nation, but also within the pan-green camp itself.
Deep-green elements are critical of what they see as the Tsai administration’s treading water over the establishment of a Taiwan state, the writing of a new constitution and the abolition of the Republic of China (ROC), as well as ambiguity over the maintenance of the “status quo” in cross-strait relations.
There is also a level of resentment over the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential primary, as some feel that former premier William Lai (賴清德), who is more overtly pro-independence, and as such was favored by the deep-greens, was treated unfairly.
Even though Tsai is leading in the polls against Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, there is no room for complacency. Unity within the pan-green camp is important if Tsai is to be confident of a victory over the KMT, and this is surely what the deep-green independence advocates want, despite their differences with Tsai and the DPP.
Present at the launch were representatives of the Taiwan Solidarity Union, the Taiwan Statebuilding Party, the Social Democratic Party, the Green Party and the Taiwan Society.
Representatives from the Taiwan Action Party Alliance, the Free Taiwan Party, the Formosa Alliance and the Taiwan National Party did not attend. Although small, those parties have the backing of prominent pan-green figures, including former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮), who still enjoy large followings, especially in southern Taiwan.
The Taiwan Action Party Alliance, formed in August and closely associated with Chen, calls in its party charter for Taiwan to become a sovereign, independent nation. It has been working closely with the Formosa Alliance, which was established in April last year to campaign for a Taiwanese independence referendum, formally becoming a political party in July this year.
Lu has criticized the DPP of becoming too much like the KMT and of letting its members down by doing little to promote independence. She called on independence advocates to form an alliance to campaign against the DPP, and had intended to represent the Formosa Alliance in the elections, had she qualified as a candidate.
When it was formed in 2011, the Taiwan National Party had an even more radical agenda, seeking to eventually expel people who identified themselves as Chinese.
Tsai’s hands are tied on many of the issues the deep-greens accuse her of failure.
Koo has been no fan of Tsai, but understands that they share certain core objectives, primarily safeguarding Taiwan’s sovereignty, whether this be, for the time being, under the name of the ROC or Taiwan. He can clearly identify the party that most closely represents his own goals and recognizes the importance of ensuring the KMT does not return to power.
Lai, too, has gone to bat for Tsai. He has the foresight to understand what is better for his vision of the nation’s future in the long term.
It is difficult to see the strategic advantage of independence advocates in hobbling the DPP’s efforts to ensure that the KMT does not win in January. They should rally behind the better alternative, which might even lead the way for Lai to return to an influential post within a DPP administration. They can pick their fights with Tsai later.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US