With only two months remaining before next year’s presidential election, more negative views of Taiwan’s economic growth and social development are coming from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), even though Taiwanese stocks have continued rising, exceeding 11,500 points last week, and the nation’s GDP growth has been surpassing expectations and may outpace regional trade rivals this year.
Taiwan’s economic development is moving in the right direction, as the US-China trade dispute has been a wake-up call, and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government has responded with efforts to entice companies away from China to invest in Taiwan.
Previous governments have tried to entice Taiwanese companies to return home, but to no avail. However, the latest government moves have sparked the biggest-ever wave of fund repatriations. As of Nov. 1, the capital repatriation drive had attracted 47 firms and individuals to apply to bring home NT$21.38 billion (US$703 million) in overseas funds since a repatriation bill took effect on Aug. 15, the Ministry of Finance’s data showed. As of Thursday, 152 companies had committed to investing a combined NT$627 billion under the government’s “Invest Taiwan” campaign, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said.
The additional homecoming investment, coupled with fund inflows, could propel all investment from abroad to a new high this year, surpassing the previous record of US$15.4 billion set in 2007.
The UN Conference on Trade and Development in a report last week identified Taiwan as the biggest beneficiary of the US-China trade dispute, and Bloomberg reported that Taiwan’s surprisingly strong year is showing no signs of slowing down.
Many recall that when the DPP first came to power in 2000, it did not stop Taiwanese businesspeople from moving to China. Instead, then-president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration replaced the “no haste, be patient” policy promoted by his predecessor Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) with an “active opening and effective management” policy toward China, which lifted more bans on China-bound investment.
The result was the hollowing out of the industrial sector, as manufacturers moved their production base to China due to the magnetic effect of cheap labor.
From an economic perspective, enterprises aim to maximize profits by pursuing a global layout strategy, as globalization is an unavoidable trend, but problems arise when operations leave and no other engine of growth emerges. This inevitably puts pressure on domestic employment and stagnates wages.
That was what happened to Taiwan over the past two decades. Today, there are major changes in the global economic and trade structure, including China’s efforts to control the global manufacturing supply chain and the US-China trade dispute.
China losing its allure as a cost-effective production base is a wake-up call for Taiwanese manufacturers. The US-China trade tensions have made it even more important for Taiwanese businesses to reconsider their operations in China.
It is against this backdrop that President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) New Southbound Policy and Invest Taiwan campaign have achieved initial results.
It is still unclear if Taiwan’s economic structure and development can be completely transformed this time, as ample room for improvement remains, considering the still-limited growth in employee wages, as well as the preliminary results of industrial upgrading and diversification.
However, what is important is that this is the correct direction for Taiwan’s economy. Policymakers need to continue working on how to develop high-value-added industries in both manufacturing and service-oriented sectors, while enterprises make an effort to move away from the cycle of low-price competition.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US