One of Asia’s oldest democracies might be in jeopardy. Sri Lanka’s presidential election next month is expected to bring to power another member of the Rajapaksa family, whose affinity for authoritarianism, violence and corruption is well-known. While Sri Lanka’s democracy survived the last test — an attempted constitutional coup by outgoing Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena a year ago — it might not survive a Gotabaya Rajapaksa presidency.
Gotabaya, as he is popularly known, is the frontrunner and previously served as Sri Lanka’s defense chief under his older brother former Sri Lankan president Mahinda Rajapaksa, Sirisena’s predecessor.
Mahinda’s decade-long tenure, which ended in 2015, was characterized by brazen nepotism, with the four Rajapaksa brothers controlling many government ministries and about 80 percent of total public spending.
By steadily expanding presidential powers, Mahinda created a quasi-dictatorship known for human-rights abuses and accused of war crimes.
Moreover, Mahinda’s pro-China foreign policy allowed for the swift expansion of Chinese influence in Sri Lanka — and rapid growth in Sri Lankan debt to China. It was the debt incurred during the last Rajapaksa presidency that forced Sirisena in 2017 to sign away to China the Indian Ocean’s most strategic port, Hambantota, along with 6,070 hectares of nearby land, on a 99-year lease.
This Hong Kong-style concession was modeled on the UK’s 19th-century colonial imposition on China.
There is little reason to doubt that Gotabaya would revive his brother’s corrosive legacy. Simply by becoming president, he could gain immunity from two lawsuits pending in US federal court over war crimes allegedly committed while he was defense chief.
With the Sri Lankan parliament’s restoration of presidential term limits prohibiting Mahinda from running again, Gotabaya renounced his US citizenship to become eligible to contest the election.
Mahinda in 2009 oversaw the end of Sri Lanka’s brutal 25-year civil war. However, he was no agent of peace. During the war’s final years, thousands of people — from aid workers and Tamil civilians to the Rajapaksa family’s political opponents — disappeared or were tortured.
The final military offensive against the Tamil Tiger rebels was, according to the UN, a “grave assault on the entire regime of international law,” with as many as 40,000 civilians killed.
According to a wartime military commander, Sarath Fonseka, Gotabaya ordered the summary execution of rebel leaders as they surrendered.
Despite the horrors they inflicted on Sri Lanka’s mostly Hindu Tamil minority, the Rajapaksa brothers became heroes to many among the country’s largely Buddhist Sinhalese majority. That emboldened Mahinda to step up efforts to fashion a mono-ethnic identity for a multiethnic country.
Renewing this approach, as Gotabaya is sure to do, would hardly ease the sectarian divide that triggered the civil war, let alone more recent tensions between the Sinhalese and Sri Lanka’s Muslims.
Those tensions increased sharply in April, when Muslim militants carried out a series of bombings on Easter Sunday that killed 253 people and wounded hundreds more.
Not only was this one of the deadliest terrorist attacks in history; it was also the first major Muslim militant attack that Sri Lanka, where Muslims constitute one-10th of the population, had ever experienced. However, that does not mean it was unforeseeable.
Sirisena admitted that defense and police officials had received an Indian intelligence report warning of an imminent attack and identifying the plotters, but that he had not seen it. Nor did Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe — the target of Sirisena’s attempted coup in October last year — receive the warning.
Sirisena abruptly fired Wickremesinghe and swore in none other than Mahinda Rajapaksa, before dissolving parliament to avoid a challenge. His actions were reversed when the Sri Lankan Supreme Court ruled them unconstitutional.
The Rajapaksas have already used the bombings to fan the flame of Sinhalese nationalism. Gotabaya has promised his supporters that, if elected, he would strengthen the intelligence services and reintroduce surveillance of citizens, to crush Muslim extremism.
The prospect of an alleged war criminal still wedded to extrajudicial methods becoming president rightly terrifies minority groups, the media and civil liberties advocates.
Yet there is more worrisome news. Gotayaba’s camp has also confirmed that, as president, he plans to “restore relations” with China.
Given Sri Lanka’s strategic location near the world’s busiest sea lanes, the implications of this pledge extend well beyond the island. Indeed, Sri Lanka could play a pivotal role in the struggle for maritime primacy between China and Indo-Pacific democratic powers — India, the US, Japan and Australia.
China’s “string of pearls” strategy has been encircling India by securing strategic military and commercial facilities along major Indian Ocean shipping lanes. Hambantota port, which Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) described as central to his Maritime Silk Road project, is a particularly valuable pearl.
At a time of growing international skepticism toward Xi’s Belt and Road Initiative, the Rajapaksa family’s potential return to power in Sri Lanka is welcome news for China, which hopes to turn the country into a military outpost.
However, it is bad news for practically everyone else. A Gotabaya presidency would block already delayed justice to victims of his brother’s regime, deepen ethnic and religious fault lines, and help China gain strategic supremacy in the Indo-Pacific region. Sri Lankan democracy appears more vulnerable than ever.
Brahma Chellaney is a professor of strategic studies at the New Delhi-based Center for Policy Research and a fellow at the Robert Bosch Academy in Berlin.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US