Zin Mar was a housewife in Bago, Myanmar, when she saw an advertisement for a job at Thai Union Group, a global seafood supplier and the world’s biggest producer of tuna.
The 44-year-old paid a local recruitment agency about 4,300 Thai baht (US$142) — less than half the sum that most migrants from Myanmar pay to win work in neighboring Thailand.
Zin Mar is among the 23,000 Burmese workers Thai Union employed under what the company calls its ethical migrant recruitment policy.
Three in four of its workers are migrants in a company that operates in 13 nations and is considered a leader in efforts to clean up an industry that was rife with worker abuse.
Four years after the Thai seafood industry came under fire for its work practices, the government and private sector have introduced a raft of measures — from worker contracts to tighter laws — to clean up the multibillion-dollar sector.
Thai Union was among the first to react, though campaigners say smaller firms have copied its lead and the pace of reform must continue if the industry is to ward off bad practice.
The industry was badly in need of a cleanup.
It was in 2014 accused of widespread slavery, trafficking, and violence on fishing boats and in processing factories.
Thai Union in 2016 was among the first in the $6.6 billion industry to adopt an ethical recruitment policy, with help from the Migrant Worker Rights Network (MWRN), a Thai non-profit assisting migrant workers, to reduce worker debt.
Debt bondage is one of the world’s most prevalent forms of modern slavery, affecting 610,000 people in Thailand, according to the Global Slavery Index by rights group Walk Free Foundation.
Under debt bondage, workers are tricked into paying to get a job, then end up trapped in a never-ending cycle of repayments that effectively means they work for free and are enslaved.
Under the more ethical Thai Union policy, it pays the recruitment fees, while workers pay about 4,300 baht for permits, health checks, visas and other services.
One of the first collaborations between the private sector and civil society, it spawned a host of copies, such as the Seafood Task Force, a coalition of businesses and charities that regularly audits fishing vessels to prevent human rights abuses.
Charoen Pokphand Foods, Thailand’s largest agriculture conglomerate, has worked for two years with a campaign group that helps migrant workers lodge complaints about their company.
Another firm, Seafresh Industry, has joined with the anti-trafficking Issara Institute to set up a migrant helpline.
“There’s an increasing dialogue taking place between industry and civil society,” said Darian McBain, who joined Thai Union in 2015 as global director of corporate affairs and sustainability.
Thailand officially has 3 million migrant workers and the UN estimates there are at least 2 million more working illegally across the nation.
Many are mired in debt or were trafficked into Thailand against their will, rights activists say.
About 55 percent of seafood processing workers paid a recruitment fee in Thailand averaging 11,000 baht, according to a report last year by the International Labour Organization.
“The first thing we did was give the MWRN access to our facility so they could talk to workers and what they found was that migrant workers were arriving from Myanmar in large debts that had built up as they journeyed to Thailand,” McBain said.
The company stopped employing migrants who had already got to Thailand and began recruiting directly from Myanmar through International Focus, an agent trained on the new policy.
The MWRN then ensures the recruits do not pay any extra fees.
“We have found cases of brokers charging workers up to 500,000 [Burmese] kyat [US$327] to find work with Thai Union, and when this happens we investigate what money they paid and who they paid it to, and if necessary we’d pay it back,” MWRN secretary-general Sein Htay said.
About 500,000 baht of fees have been returned to Thai Union workers, he said.
Now the challenge is to ensure workers pay no fees.
Oxfam policy and campaign manager Jacques-chai Chomthongdi said that workers could pay up to four times the legal limit of 150,000 kyat at home to get work abroad.
“Workers still have to bear these costs and those in debt are at risk of forced labor,” Chomthongdi said.
He spoke on behalf of a coalition of civil society organizations that advise the Thai seafood industry.
Thai Union was a trailblazer in fighting modern slavery, he said, but smaller firms are now adopting similar policies in a bid to stamp out exploitation during the recruitment process.
“Other companies, some with a much smaller scale, are starting to catch up,” Chomthongdi said. “This is a welcome development. However, if they [Thai Union] don’t adapt and ensure that the implementation of existing good policies are maintained rigorously, they might eventually become a follower.”
The EU in 2015 gave Thailand a “yellow card” warning for failing to prevent illegal and unregulated fish from entering the supply chain and ending up in Europe. It required Thailand to clean up in six months or face a trade ban.
The EU in January removed the yellow card in light of efforts by Thailand to combat human trafficking and improve conditions for workers, but fisheries associations — emboldened by a change in government — are now pushing for a relaxation to the rules.
Among the demands: dropping age restrictions so that 16-year-olds can work on fishing boats; scrapping vessel inspections; and letting vessels swap out crew and catch at sea, far from any oversight.
“One of the main challenges Thailand is facing at the moment is ensuring that the reforms that have been painstakingly introduced over the past five years are not swiftly removed and replaced with policies that would return the industry to ‘business as usual,’” said Steve Trent, executive director of the Environmental Justice Foundation, an advocacy group that investigates environmental and human rights abuses.
Industry experts are also urging Thailand to grant migrant workers the same rights in terms of freedom to organize and collective bargaining as Thai workers.
At Thai Union, employees can e-mail their concerns, post suggestions to post boxes or call a third-party hotline.
“Collaboration and engagement is key to solving the world’s big challenges like ending modern slavery,” McBain said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing