Last month, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee passed the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act. This is just the first step in the legislative process, of course, but given Capitol Hill’s record on Taiwan over the last two years, it’s got a good chance of passing and being signed into law before the end of the Congress next year.
The TAIPEI Act authorizes the President of the US to penalize countries that shift diplomatic relations from Taipei to Beijing, or to reward them for not doing so. The bill’s sponsor, Senator Cory Gardner (R-CO) is addressing a problem many of Taiwan’s supporters in Washington are wrestling with, how to help Taiwan maintain a modicum of diplomatic recognition, despite the fact that the US itself does not recognize Taiwan.
Senator Gardner is right to try. But even as he and other friends of Taiwan try, Washington needs to start planning for a future in which Taiwan has none of these now 15 “allies.”
Let’s look at a few realities.
First, starting with the obvious — US recognition of Beijing instead of Taipei is not going to change. The deal it struck with China in the 1970s is a permanent feature of American diplomacy and the international environment. Love it, hate it, or anything in between, China is a big and ever more powerful country. The US has a broad range of interests at stake in its dealings with it. Its governments must be able to talk to each other.
Second, Taiwan is a state. Governments, analysts, NGOs use special language to talk about Taiwan. But we can never lose sight of the fact that Taiwan has defined borders, a government, a permanent population, and the capacity to conduct relations with other countries. Call it what you must, but this makes it a state — independent of whether it is recognized by others.
Third, Taiwan’s unofficial relations are far more important to Taiwan than its official ones. We call the countries that recognize Taiwan its “allies,” but they are far from that. Panama would never have come to the armed defense of Taiwan. The US, while not an “ally,” will, and it will be joined by its own (real) allies, like Japan. Even in peacetime, Taiwan gets far more from its informal relationships with countries like Japan, Australia, Singapore and Germany than it ever did from Kiribati. And there is even more these friends of Taiwan can do.
Fourth, how much are these 15 relationships really worth? President Tsai (蔡英文) is right not to get in a bidding war over their loyalties. American policy makers would be crazy to step into this role itself. If there are areas where we can work together to help them in areas like public health and cyber security, or development, or investment, great. Maybe that buys some time, and that’s good. But if you think this is going to dissuade them from one day cutting a deal with Beijing… well, I think the recent history speaks for itself. As for the most important of Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic allies, the Vatican, it doesn’t need any of the assistance the US or Taiwan can offer. It’s in the market for souls and there are far more of them in China than Taiwan.
Fifth, “transits” are not the only excuse for stop-overs in the US. Probably the most significant loss that will come with loss of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies will be its loss of a pretext for Presidential visits to the US. Come on. We can be more imaginative than that. How about another university invitation, a la Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) 1995, or an NGO invitation? Surely there is an NGO somewhere in the Western Hemisphere that will be happy to have the democratically elected leader of Taiwan grace them with his or her presence.
A final consideration to keep in mind is the constitutional limits on Congress. As I’ve said before in this column, Congress is the primary source of stability in US support for Taiwan. It is absolutely within its powers to pass the TAIPEI Act. But just as the passage of the Taiwan Travel Act did not legally compel the executive branch to step up its direct contact with Taipei, neither will the TAIPEI Act require the President to do the things it suggests. Rather, it is a set of recommendations and authorizations to enable and encourage him.
In the US, we have the expression “nice-to-haves,” meaning things that are nice to have, but not essential. That’s the category where Taiwan’s diplomatic allies fit. By all means, Washington should help Taiwan keep their flags flying in Taipei. And Congress must be out front in the effort. There is no guarantee that future American administrations will be as supportive of Taiwan as this one. At the same time, though, we have to keep the effort in perspective and start to plan for a future without them.
Walter Lohman is director of the Heritage Foundation’s Asian Studies Center.
Is a new foreign partner for Taiwan emerging in the Middle East? Last week, Taiwanese media reported that Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) secretly visited Israel, a country with whom Taiwan has long shared unofficial relations but which has approached those relations cautiously. In the wake of China’s implicit but clear support for Hamas and Iran in the wake of the October 2023 assault on Israel, Jerusalem’s calculus may be changing. Both small countries facing literal existential threats, Israel and Taiwan have much to gain from closer ties. In his recent op-ed for the Washington Post, President William
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
A stabbing attack inside and near two busy Taipei MRT stations on Friday evening shocked the nation and made headlines in many foreign and local news media, as such indiscriminate attacks are rare in Taiwan. Four people died, including the 27-year-old suspect, and 11 people sustained injuries. At Taipei Main Station, the suspect threw smoke grenades near two exits and fatally stabbed one person who tried to stop him. He later made his way to Eslite Spectrum Nanxi department store near Zhongshan MRT Station, where he threw more smoke grenades and fatally stabbed a person on a scooter by the roadside.
Recent media reports have again warned that traditional Chinese medicine pharmacies are disappearing and might vanish altogether within the next 15 years. Yet viewed through the broader lens of social and economic change, the rise and fall — or transformation — of industries is rarely the result of a single factor, nor is it inherently negative. Taiwan itself offers a clear parallel. Once renowned globally for manufacturing, it is now best known for its high-tech industries. Along the way, some businesses successfully transformed, while others disappeared. These shifts, painful as they might be for those directly affected, have not necessarily harmed society