More than 30 bullet holes told Awapu Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau a sinister tale.
“Their message is that they’re going to finish us off, isn’t it?” the village chieftain said as he examined the pockmarked sign warning outsiders to stay off the giant Amazon reserve he calls home.
Brazil was only 11 days into Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency when dozens of armed land-grabbers rolled up at the Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau territory and cut a trail into the forest, claiming Bolsonaro’s anti-indigenous rhetoric meant they would not be stopped.
Eventually the intruders were repelled — but not before leaving their leaden response to the government notice cautioning trespassers against straying on to supposedly protected land.
“We’re scared,” said Awapu, a 27-year-old cacique (chief) who has received death threats for speaking out against the invaders. “Nobody wants to die.”
The slow-burn assault on Brazil’s indigenous lands did not begin in January with Bolsonaro’s far-right presidency. Awapu, and activists across the country, say they are convinced the onslaught has intensified since Bolsonaro took power, as illegal loggers, goldminers, poachers and land-grabbers take the president’s verbal offensive against such communities as a green light to act.
Last month Brazil’s Indigenous Missionary Council rights group denounced that 153 indigenous territories had been invaded since January — more than double last year’s figure of 76 — partly blaming the surge on Bolsonaro’s “aggressive” talk.
Nor does the threat come only from illegal actors such as those behind the January raid on the Wales-sized Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau reserve in Rondonia state. Increasingly, it is coming from the government itself.
In the coming days Bolsonaro is set to unveil draft legislation that would allow commercial mining in indigenous territories, something currently outlawed, despite overwhelming opposition from voters.
“Indians don’t want to be poor landowners living on rich soils — especially the richest soils on Earth,” Bolsonaro told last month’s UN general assembly, boasting of the gold, diamonds, uranium, niobium and rare earths hidden beneath their reserves.
“Not since the dictatorship have Brazil’s indigenous peoples felt as threatened as they do now,” said Randolfe Rodrigues, a progressive senator from Amapa, another of the Amazon’s nine states.
“And it’s not just threats. It is concrete facts,” Rodrigues added, highlighting attacks on Amapa’s Waiapi indigenous community and the recent murder of an activist fighting to protect the territory sheltering Brazil’s largest concentration of uncontacted tribes.
Fatima Cleide, a prominent Workers’ party politician in Rondonia, said indigenous communities stood at a historic and perilous juncture.
“This is a war for survival? What they want is for the indigenous peoples to disappear,” Cleide said.
Bolsonaro allies celebrate his Amazonian blueprint and brand critics foreign conspirators.
Marcos Rocha, Rondonia’s Bolsonarista governor, claimed opening supposedly impoverished indigenous communities to mining would bring “dignity.”
“Indians want to grow and to develop, just like any human being. Most other countries have decimated their Indians. We want them to walk alongside us — because they are Brazilians, just like us,” he said.
The Bolsonarian congressman Joao Chrisostomo compared his leader’s plans to the creation of casinos on Native American reservations in the United States.
“Today all the Indians there are super millionaires,” Chrisostomo said, laughing.
Many fear Bolsonaro’s moves could prove catastrophic for small and already fragile communities such as the 150-strong Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau — a semi-nomadic, Tupi-speaking group which remained uncontacted until 1981 and whose members were once called the Bocas Pretas (Black Mouths) for their distinctive tattoos made with the juice of the genipap tree.
“The government’s attitude towards indigenous people is the same attitude the Portuguese had when they first came to Brazil: to enslave, to colonize and to acculturate — to destroy their cultures,” Rodrigues said. “Bolsonaro is a president who governs with the mindset of a Portuguese mercenary who arrived here in the 16th century.”
Indigenous Missionary Council head Roque Paloschi said his group was not opposed to progress, per se: “But what kind of progress — and for whom?”
Brazil’s indigenous peoples — who numbered upwards of 3.5 million when Portuguese explorers arrived in 1500 — suffered a wretched start to the 20th century. As outsiders pushed deeper into their traditional homes, illness and violence reduced their total population to as little as 70,000. During the 1970s they faced further pain as the dictatorship bulldozed roads through the Amazon and lured migrants with the slogan “a land without men for men without land.”
The return of democracy brought hope. Brazil’s 1988 constitution gave indigenous communities the exclusive right to vast areas, and protected reservations such as the 1.9 million hectare Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau territory were born. By the turn of the century Brazil’s indigenous population had rebounded to some 350,000.
“Until Bolsonaro came along it was looking really very good,” said John Hemming, a veteran chronicler of indigenous affairs whose latest book remembers the Villas-Boas brothers, storied Brazilian explorers and champions of the indigenous cause.
Hemming added: “Brazil can be so, so proud of what it has done, but that is all about to be undone by this creature.”
Hemming said the Villas-Boas brothers — who helped create Brazil’s most famous indigenous reserve in the Xingu — would be “turning in their graves” at Bolsonaro’s “terrifying” plans. Claims Bolsonaro’s project would make tycoons of the indigenous were “a Goebbels-type lie.”
“I’m in despair, like everyone else,” Hemming said.
On the Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau reserve — and indigenous territories across Brazil — despair is spurring action.
On a recent afternoon, two village leaders emerged from the rainforest, carrying rifles and drenched in sweat after a day tracking illegal loggers into the jungle.
“All we heard was the din of the chainsaw. We didn’t see them,” 33-year-old Ari Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau said, showing off a smartphone video of the scene.
As he wolfed down a late lunch of peccary and pasta, the second man, Clebeson Tenharim, said he was certain the invasions were accelerating.
“It wasn’t like this last year. It has got much worse. They’re really coming into the reserve now,” he said.
Tenharim had no doubt who was to blame.
“This Bolsonaro … all he wants to do is destroy,” the 36-year-old said, arguing that the president’s hostility to indigenous communities was encouraging raiders. “They think the government’s on their side.”
Now hardwood-looting loggers are no longer the only menace. Tenharim said Bolsonaro would “rent the indigenous land out to foreigners” and wondered who would benefit, apart from mining goliaths from abroad.
“It’s difficult to understand our government,” Tenharim said. “First they make a law giving us the right to the reserve. Then they break it themselves.”
As he toured Aldeia Nova — one of six small settlements on the reservation’s eastern flank — Awapu Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau said he was also perplexed by the government’s designs.
“They should respect our culture,” the cacique said. “When the Portuguese arrived we were already here. Everyone who has studied history knows this.”
At the UN last month Brazil’s president posed as an ally of the indigenous, donning a necklace from the Xingu as proof of his dedication.
“Brazil now has a president who cares about those who were here before the arrival of the Portuguese in 1500,” said Bolsonaro, whose Italian ancestors migrated to Brazil in the late 19th century.
Thousands of miles away in the Amazon few descendants of Brazil’s original inhabitants are convinced by such claims.
“[If Bolsonaro came here] I’d tie him up … until he abandoned this act he wants to pass,” Tenharim said.
Awapu was more downbeat as he pondered the future of his ancestral home.
“We feel sad,” he said. “We don’t know where this will end.”
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
In the face of the COVID-19 crisis, cities around the world are re-evaluating the importance of accessible green spaces for the benefit of public health and well-being. However, Taiwan’s success in containing the virus might impede opportunities to transform its cities into greener, healthier and more resilient places. Urban vegetable gardens have been highlighted by community planners worldwide during this wave of the green-space movement. Such gardens help enhance food security and also mental health, which in turn fosters social resilience in local communities during lockdowns. Since 2015, Taipei has run the “garden city” program, which allocates vacant land for use as
In March 2011, then-US president Barack Obama’s director of national intelligence, James Clapper, told the US Senate Intelligence Committee that, considering both its capabilities and intent, communist China presented “the greatest mortal threat” to the US, followed by Russia. In the ensuing years, in the face of faltering US responses, China expanded and intensified its hostile actions against US interests and values. Consistent with US President Donald Trump’s call for a dramatic new approach, within months of taking office, his administration’s National Security Strategy said of China’s multidimensional assault: “China is using economic inducements and penalties, influence operations ... implied military