The Republic of China (ROC) has lost another two allies. Had this happened in any other country, the government and the opposition would have joined in condemning China. However, due to national identity issues and a political struggle, the opposition used this as an opportunity to attack the government.
It was the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) mistaken “one China” goal of “retaking the Chinese mainland” that led to Taiwan’s diplomatic decline, and now the KMT is shamelessly condemning the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government.
In 1949, the KMT government was defeated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the Chinese Civil War and retreated to Taiwan, while the US was still standing by watching the ROC’s crisis.
When the Korean War broke out in 1950, the CCP sent troops to assist North Korea, while the US adopted a policy of containment and signed the Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty, recognizing the ROC as the representative of China, allowing it to remain in the UN.
After the Korean War, the US initiated a series of talks with China aimed at building relations between the two, based on the CCP’s military strength and the amount of territory controlled by the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Meanwhile, developing countries advocated that the PRC replace the ROC at the UN.
In the 1970s, then-US president Richard Nixon used a strategic alliance between the US and China to contain Russia, issuing the joint US-China Shanghai Communique and laying the foundation for diplomatic relations and the US’ “one China” policy.
Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) knew that the international situation was unfavorable to having the ROC remain as the UN representative of China, but pretending that he had the “legally constituted authority” — that the ROC government in Taiwan ruled all of China so that Chiang could remain indefinitely in power — he stubbornly continued to promote a “one China” policy in which the ROC ruled all of China and was the only legitimate government to represent it.
He also advocated “retaking the Chinese mainland,” with a foreign policy based on the idea that “gentlemen cannot stand together with thieves.”
This resulted in the loss of many diplomatic allies and the ROC’s withdrawal from the UN, thus preventing Taiwan from being a de jure independent country.
At the time, China was neither a powerful nation nor a member of the UN, and the US was trying to offer Taiwan support by keeping it in the UN with a “two China” solution.
Had the KMT government denounced sovereignty over China, Taiwan would have remained in the UN and kept most of its diplomatic allies. It could then have become a de jure independent nation by writing a new constitution and changing its name.
During the Cold War, the KMT’s “one China” stance and its “gentlemen cannot stand together with thieves” policy also lost it many allies. After establishing diplomatic ties with China, the US and other countries had to follow a “one China” policy, which seriously suppresses Taiwan’s diplomacy.
To expand diplomatic relations, the most important task for Taiwan is to break through the diplomatic restrictions caused by the US’ “one China” policy.
The government must review the situation and make the most of the US’ Taiwan Travel Act and other such US legislation to build a stronger relationship with the US.
This would enable the US to amend its “one China” policy and resume diplomatic relations with Taiwan. When that happens, Taiwan would also be recognized by the international community.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat who served in the US.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US