Accidents involving wheelchair users on buses are so frequent that the Control Yuan has instructed the Ministry of Transportation and Communications to review the situation.
The Taiwan Association for Disability Rights calls on the government to comply with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, whose terms have binding legal force in Taiwan. The government should introduce legislation so that public transport companies would only be granted a license by the ministry for a new vehicle if it meets standards that enable mobility-impaired passengers to get on and off easily.
A Control Yuan report said that the government has over the past five years provided NT$4.2 billion (US$13.5 million) in subsidies for operators to purchase barrier-free buses. Many operators have been doing their best to cooperate with this policy. The next task should be to take steps toward writing this policy into law, and the ministry is duty-bound to so. On no account should the progress made over many years be allowed to slip away because administrative departments move too slowly.
The ministry should make business licenses subject to the standards, thus pushing more operators to catch up and comply. This is the only way to insure that the effort the government and cooperating operators have made over many years does not go to waste. Applying these standards across the board would make operators play by the same rules, making for fair competition.
Steps must be taken to greet the arrival of an aging society. The urban-rural gap should be narrowed so that disabled people everywhere in Taiwan can use public transport. The ministry is duty-bound to make this happen.
The labor rights of bus drivers must also be protected. Their tasks include deploying ramps for wheelchair users getting on and off buses.
The association has repeatedly called upon the ministry to set standards for passenger waiting areas. Although Taiwan has standards governing signage and markings, there is no uniform standard for waiting areas. If waiting areas are too high above road level, electric accessibility ramps might not be deployable. The ministry clearly knows about this situation, but has done nothing.
The association once again calls upon Minister of Transportation and Communications Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) to resolve this simple problem.
What is the average life for buses in general service? The state has paid operators NT$4.2 billion over five years in subsidies to buy new buses, but not even 10 percent of highway and freeway buses are barrier-free. This is not good enough.
Many countries have long since incorporated the aim of making all public transportation barrier-free through sunrise legislation. If the ministry continues to disregard the UN’s provisions, the association will submit another complaint to the Control Yuan, asking it to investigate whether officials have neglected their duty so that the process of making Taiwan’s public transport barrier-free has been delayed, reducing the urban-rural transport accessibility gap.
If so, the bureaucrats in the government agencies should be disciplined accordingly.
Liu Chun-ling is managing director of the Taiwan Association for Disability Rights.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US