Taiwan has banned the sale of e-cigarettes, a cautious approach that now appears to be wise given a rise in the number of deaths linked to the practice worldwide, but regulated sales might be a more appropriate response. Such incidents have led to India last week banning the sale, manufacture, import and marketing — but not use — of e-cigarettes and the US pulling flavored products from store shelves.
Despite the ban here, vaping has proved popular among young people. The devices are available for sale online or at night markets, and even though customs officials confiscate them, people are not prosecuted for attempting to bring them into Taiwan. Data vary, but an estimated 50,000 young Taiwanese use e-cigarettes.
Most e-cigarettes contain nicotine, but have drastically reduced amounts, or none, of the more harmful ingredients that are in conventional cigarettes, nor does the process entail burning, which causes carcinogens. As such, they are seen not only as a less harmful method of nicotine consumption, but also a viable option for cigarette smokers wanting to quit. Another perceived advantage is the absence of smoke, which many find unpleasant and is linked to health risks through passive smoking.
These factors are not uncontested: There is evidence that non-smokers can actually be drawn to smoking conventional cigarettes after getting a taste for nicotine through vaping. More serious are the cases around the world of pulmonary disease linked to vaping, some of which have been fatal. In some of these cases, the people affected had pre-existing conditions or were using unregulated products containing THC, the principal psychoactive constituent of cannabis. Also, the suspected clusters of e-cigarette-related pulmonary complications have seemingly exploded this year, while vaping has been around for more than 10 years. A decade might not be enough to properly evaluate the long-term health effects of vaping, or whether pulmonary problems linked to their use are temporary or long-lasting.
Studies in the US have underscored that no correlation has been found between e-cigarettes and pulmonary conditions. That is not to say there is none, it simply means that more work needs to be done, while caution should be taken.
The problems might be from reactions between ingredients that produce toxic substances, or by metal particles released as the device heats up. They could also be due to cheap, unsafe, unregulated products being sold online.
Banning e-cigarette sales gets lawmakers off the hook to a degree, but tens of thousands of young people are vaping, with many getting the products from unregulated, potentially dubious sources. Allowing their sale in Taiwan would at least keep the market above ground, enabling effective regulation, including labeling rules and penalties, which would expose manufacturers and sellers to legal liability. The government could also introduce a public information campaign warning of the potential dangers of vaping.
There is no legislation capable of regulating this category of products, as it is not tobacco or a pharmaceutical drug, so it will fall between the cracks until a category is created for vaping.
The alternative is to wait for a social health scare and for people to die, which would force lawmakers to act after failing to pre-empt a situation that is well-documented.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with