The feature on Dong An Elementary School in yesterday’s edition of the Taipei Times serves as a prime example of how Taiwanese can embrace diversity and take advantage of the cultural resources and opportunities new immigrants bring to the nation.
While Taiwan has a fast-growing Southeast Asian population — whether they be students, migrant workers or new immigrants — there is still much mistrust and discrimination against them in society, despite the efforts of government and civic organizations to bring both sides to a better mutual understanding.
The avenues through which these migrants arrive in Taiwan will only increase, not just through foreign policy, but demand: For instance, a shortage of agricultural workers has led the government to allow dairy businesses and farmers’ groups to each hire 400 foreign workers for up to 12 years, with 300 arriving in the next two months.
Although the situation has improved over the past decade, the treatment of migrant workers by Taiwanese employers continues to make headlines and garner international attention, marring the government’s and public’s efforts to boost the nation’s profile.
Last week, Taiwan reclaimed its spot on expat networking Web site InterNations’ ranking as the best place in the world for expatriates to live, and it is one of two satellite nations hosting the Oslo Freedom Forum this weekend.
The Federation of International Human Rights Museums has also announced that it will be opening its Asia-Pacific branch in Taiwan, with federation president David Fleming saying: “Taiwan has diverse cultural and ethnic groups, and works hard to promote human rights.”
Before celebrating these achievements, Taiwanese should take a hard look at how they view diverse cultural and ethnic groups, as the government and civic groups working on their behalf can only do so much.
Dong An’s case is inspiring, but it also started with mistrust. With a significant Aboriginal and new immigrant population, the school’s enrollment rate floundered as parents worried that their children would be exposed to an “academically inferior environment.”
While this was seven years ago, these beliefs die hard.
Instead of trying to cater to the majority of parents, the school embraced its diversity and created a multicultural education program from scratch that encouraged students to learn the Vietnamese and Indonesian languages — something that has only been available to schools recently through the government’s language policy.
Today, Dong An is a popular school where not only children of immigrant parents can feel proud to speak their mother tongue, but where Taiwanese are also eager to learn the languages. It proves that given the right environment, children can learn to respect and appreciate the benefits of diversity, instead of succumbing to the cycle of ignorance perpetrated by adults, who often question the need for their children to learn these languages.
This negative attitude is often carried by the new immigrant parents themselves, as statistics show that only 2,513 out of about 6,000 first-grade children of immigrants plan to sign up for the new language courses at school in the new academic year.
If more Taiwanese embrace diversity and are willing to treat the new immigrants with more respect, then these parents would feel more comfortable having their children embrace their culture.
With the Southeast Asian economy rapidly expanding and modernizing, Taiwanese students who learn these languages now will only find them even more useful in the future.
Dong An was successful in taking a negative environment and making it a place where students receive a first-hand experience of cultural diversity at a young age. This is the direction Taiwan should be taking as it continues to shift toward a multicultural society.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers