When Vice Premier Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) was asked by reporters to comment on China rotating troops in Hong Kong in an apparent move to intimidate protesters in the territory, Chen, citing the fable of the “North Wind and the Sun,” said that any heavy-handed approach or military intimidation would likely backfire.
The parallel that Chen drew was plain to the point that it was almost trite, which is why it is beyond many people’s comprehension why the Chinese government has yet to understand this simple concept.
A case in point would be the travel restrictions that last month Beijing placed on 47 Chinese cities, banning their residents from traveling to Taiwan unless they are a part of a tour group.
The move was clearly politically motivated and aimed squarely at casting President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in a negative light ahead of next year’s presidential election.
This tactic might affect the livelihoods of travel agency owners and succeed in persuading them not to vote for Tsai, but would it have the same effect on the ordinary voter who could not care less if there are fewer Chinese tourists?
The travel ban could serve as another confirmation for Taiwanese that China would readily persecute their nation and government. Instead of inspiring awe and invoking desire to unify with the “motherland,” it would only stoke anti-China sentiment among Taiwanese, and Beijing would only achieve the opposite of what it wants.
Tsai last month said that the government had anticipated the travel restrictions, which is a tactic Beijing is prone to employ ahead of elections when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is in power.
Thanks to the government’s efforts to push policies that appeal to tourists from more countries, the number of inbound visitors last year reached an all-time high of 11 million, she said, adding that “treating tourists like political bargaining chips would only repel Taiwanese.”
Indeed, China attempting to instill fear in Taiwanese by limiting the number of Chinese tourists is no news. Since Tsai took office in May 2016, rumors about Chinese authorities denying tourist groups permission to travel to Taiwan have been endless.
Beijing should have learned by now that it is useless to try to browbeat Taiwanese into voting against the DPP — just like the north wind eventually learned that it could not blow the clothes off the traveler — but it tries anyway.
This shows that it is at its wits’ end over Tsai, whose support rating received a substantial and much-needed boost after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in March rashly flew warplanes across the median line of the Taiwan Strait, thanks to her tough response to the PLA’s provocation and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) proposal to impose a “one country, two systems” framework on Taiwan.
Polls have shown that Tsai would win more votes than all her known and potential election rivals — Kaohsiung Mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) and Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — in any possible setting.
So how could China have made such blunders as the fly-bys and the travel ban? At a time when China is trying to up its “united front” game, such impulsive and myopic decisions have not only backfired, but they almost make Xi seem like Tsai’s chief campaign officer.
As election day draws nearer, it has become harder to tell whether China’s antics are blessings or curses.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past