For almost a year, Afghanistan’s more than 30 million people have been in the awkward position of waiting as a US envoy and the Taliban negotiate their country’s fate behind closed doors.
An agreement on ending the US’ longest war, which the US once hoped to reach by this month, could set a timeline for US troops’ withdrawal, but also nudge aside this month’s presidential election and open the way for a Taliban return to power. The militants continue their attacks, again invading a major city, Kunduz, on Saturday and the city of Puli Khumri on Sunday.
Without a say in their own future, Afghans’ frustration is clear.
Illustration: Mountain People
“We don’t know what is going on, but we are just so tired,” said Sonia, a teacher in the capital, Kabul, who like many people goes by one name.
Reflecting the helplessness, a new television ad shows residents of all 34 provinces holding up pieces of paper that simply read: “Peace.” An art group in Kabul has begun painting concrete blast walls with tens of thousands of tulips, the national flower, as symbols of the civilians killed in nearly 18 years of fighting.
A peace movement praised by Afghans for a daring march across the country warns that the Taliban, who control or hold sway over about half of Afghanistan nearly two decades after a US-led invasion toppled them from power, are just as harsh as the days when women were forced out of sight and entertainment was banned under Shariah law.
A 23-year-old member of the peace movement, Sayed Rahim Omid, shyly lowered his trousers and showed a still-painful wound on his leg where he said that Taliban members in his hometown in southern Helmand Province had whipped him with cables.
“Stop your activism,” they told him last month. “Who’s paying you?”
His family secured his release by swearing he would never speak out again. Then he promptly fled to Kabul.
Several peace marchers have been beaten up, he and fellow members said.
“I don’t know how to trust them,” Omid said of the Taliban, even as its leaders meet with Afghan-born US Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad in a luxury setting in Qatar and signal regret for their past ways.
Repentance about the present seems to be another matter.
A former Taliban military leader in a province neighboring Kabul, Syed Akbar Agha, defended the beatings, saying that the peace movement gives the impression that the insurgent group does not want the war to end.
Sitting in a leafy yard in Kabul, he said that the Taliban’s tens of thousands of members would respect whatever is agreed to in Qatar, where the group has a political office.
He pointed to last year’s extraordinary ceasefire during the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Fitr, during which fighters and Afghans chatted and posed for photographs. The Taliban later rejected a government call to try it again.
Better times are on the way for the Afghan people, Agha said, as about 20,000 US and other foreign troops prepare to withdraw in return for Taliban assurances that Afghanistan would not become a haven for terror groups plotting overseas attacks.
“Good memories of the Taliban will help them trust the Taliban and support them,” he said, but bristled when asked how the insurgent group could justify punishments such as stoning and cutting off hands.
“Are you a Muslim?” he asked.
Such talk puts Afghans on the defensive.
“If the Taliban dream of ruling the country as they once did, we don’t need them,” Kabul resident Mahbob Shah said.
The Taliban have refused to negotiate with the Afghan government and call it a US puppet, raising serious questions about intra-Afghan talks meant to follow a US-Taliban deal and work out the country’s political future.
Both sides should negotiate as “ordinary people” and form a new government, Agha said.
The belief that an interim government would follow a US-Taliban agreement has led most candidates in the Sept. 28 presidential election, including Afghan Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah, to say that they prioritize peace over a vote. The Taliban have warned Afghans to boycott the election, saying that polling stations would be targets.
The developments anger Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, who seeks a second term and a strong mandate so that the government can better negotiate with the Taliban, who already portray a US troop withdrawal as their victory.
Weary Afghans appear more flexible, calling for peace above all.
Some are also skeptical that a 15-member negotiating team for intra-Afghan talks, yet to be announced by the government, would be representative of civil society and women, whose fate is especially fragile. The Taliban are expected to have the power to strike people from that list.
“These are the same old people,” peace movement member Pachakhil Mawladad said of the expected negotiators. “One day he’s an adviser, another day he’s a driver, another day he’s a minister and he’s always running around the president. They cannot represent the Afghan people.”
A collapse of talks could bring another civil war, some analysts and Afghans have said.
The country has been ravaged for 40 years. There was a decade-long Russian occupation in 1979, followed by bloody infighting among mujahidin who had received US backing against the Russians. After a pro-communist government fell and four years of civil war killed about 50,000 people, the Taliban took power in 1996. Now, some of the former mujahidin who partnered with the US to oust the Taliban are back in the government.
Few people in Afghanistan remember what peace is like.
In Kabul, where street protests can be targets for attacks, concerns about the future are often expressed more quietly.
“Anything you do in Afghanistan can be very dangerous,” said Omaid Sharifi, whose ArtLords group paints tulips on blast walls in four cities to remember civilians killed in the current war.
The stenciled flowers are placed near attack sites and some grieving family members join in, painting the names of the dead. About 15,000 tulips have been completed.
Whatever the US and Taliban discuss is their own business, with the “real questions” starting when the Taliban sit down with regular Afghans for talks, Sharifi said.
“We just have to find a way to live together,” he said of the moment when the Taliban and the Afghan government face the reality of each other’s existence. “We just have to come to our senses and say: ‘It’s enough. Let’s find another way.’”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95