Nowadays, making an investment — whether in shares, bonds, property, gold, lottery tickets or the latest start-up — is quick and easy, but when it comes to investments in people, the dividends are not always as clear, nor is the means by which the returns cam be measured.
One might be doubly wary of investing in people who have been uprooted from their homes, stripped of their livelihoods and possessions, possibly separated from their families and forced to start all over again, but, in fact, refugees are one of the best investments out there.
Educating those who have been displaced by conflict and upheaval is not an expense, but a golden opportunity.
For most people in advanced economies, education is how curiosity is fed, passions are discovered and looking after oneself is learned, navigating the worlds of work and civic and social life.
For refugees, education performs the same functions, but also does much more. It is the surest road to recovering a sense of purpose and dignity after the trauma of displacement.
It is also — or at least should be — a route to economic self-sufficiency. At a time when governments are wasting trillions of US dollars on conflict, investing in those who have been forcibly displaced is a no-brainer.
In its latest annual report on refugee education, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) found that gains in educational enrollment have extended life-changing opportunities to tens of thousands of refugee children, adolescents and young people.
The share of refugees enrolled in primary school has increased from 61 percent to 63 percent in the past year, while secondary-school enrollment has risen from 23 percent to 24 percent.
Most notably, the share of refugees accessing higher education has reached 3 percent, after being stuck at 1 percent for the past several years.
Higher education is what turns students into leaders. By harnessing young refugees’ creativity, energy and idealism, it positions them to become role models and furnishes them with the means to amplify their voices and enable rapid generational change.
That said, the low level of secondary-school enrollment should trouble us. The proportion of refugees enrolled in secondary education (24 percent) is more than two-thirds lower than the level for non-refugees globally (84 percent).
This shortfall will have devastating effects. Without the stepping stone of secondary school, the progress made over the past year will be short-lived. Millions of refugee children’s futures will be thrown away.
Consider the case of Gift, a South Sudanese boy, now living in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, who was so determined to go to school that he learned French and engineered his own solar-powered light to study after dark. His hopes of progressing to secondary school are likely to be dashed, as there simply are no such schools in his area.
Likewise, Hina, who excelled in primary school, discovered that only one of the 500 spots available at a secondary school in Peshawar, Pakistan, was available to a refugee like her.
I myself have witnessed similar situations in Bangladesh, where far too many refugee children are unable to attend official schools and follow an accredited curriculum.
As if it were not bad enough that refugee children are being denied a route to higher, technical and vocational education and training, failing to provide secondary education also makes it more likely that they will be pulled into child labor or criminal activities. When girls are in school, they are less likely to be coerced into early marriage and pregnancy.
Unless the international community ensures universal access to an inclusive secondary education, it will fail to meet several of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
In addition to SDG 4 — to “ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all” — global commitments to eradicate poverty, promote decent work and reduce inequality will also be imperiled.
It is thus imperative that refugee children be included in national education systems, where they can acquire recognized certifications.
In the classroom, refugee children and young people can develop their potential in peaceful coexistence with one another and with local children.
In a world where conflict seems to come more easily than peace, that is an invaluable lesson.
Investing in refugee education is a collective responsibility with far-reaching collective rewards. That is why governments, businesses, educational institutions and nongovernmental organizations must come together to improve the provision of education at all levels — particularly secondary — and ensure that refugees have the same access as host-country citizens.
The UNCHR’s ambition over the next decade, as outlined in our Refugee Education 2030 strategy, is for refugees to achieve parity with their non-refugee peers in pre-primary, primary and secondary education, and to boost their enrollment in higher education to 15 percent.
I am therefore proud to announce the formal launch of the Secondary Youth Education Programme, a new initiative to improve secondary-education opportunities for refugees.
Having run pilot programs in Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda and Pakistan since 2017, we now plan to expand the initiative substantially in the coming years.
The focus will be on investment in teachers and schools, and facilitating community schemes to boost enrollment and attract financial support for refugee families.
By increasing secondary-level enrollment, we can increase the likelihood that both refugees and their host-community peers will progress to higher studies.
If young refugees have confidence that a full education is possible, they will be more motivated to attend school and stay, and because the program is geared toward to refugees and the community alike, all children will benefit from the opportunities that emerge.
With the UNCHR’s Global Refugee Forum approaching in December, my hope is that governments, the private sector, educational organizations and donors will come together in support of this initiative.
Collaboration and a sense of shared responsibility are at the heart of the Global Compact on Refugees. Through education, young refugees will be more prepared to help build a resilient, sustainable and peaceful world.
There could be no higher return on investment than that.
Filippo Grandi is the UN high commissioner for refugees.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers