According to data from the Ministry of the Interior, the number of foreigners and foreign spouses — including from China, Hong Kong and Macau — who have applied for naturalization or acquired residence certificates was 548,952 as of June, while “new immigrants,” who have more than 350,000 children account for 2 percent of the population and are the fifth-largest group in Taiwan.
According to other ministry data, as of July there were 569,008 Aborigines. While Aborigines’ rights are protected by dozens of laws, including the Indigenous Peoples Basic Act (原住民族基本法), there is not a single special law for immigrants, except for articles scattered throughout the Immigration Act (入出國及移民法) and other laws. An immigrants’ basic act and an economic immigration bill are pending legislative review.
There are several things that should be done to help solve immigrant issues:
First, the Executive Yuan’s New Immigrants’ Affairs Coordination Committee should be upgraded to a new immigrants’ council — a tier-two agency — to deal with immigrant affairs as a specialized entity.
Second, the New Immigrants’ Development Fund should be transformed into a legally stipulated budget for the mooted council. An immigrants’ affairs budget should be compiled by the council, as it would have a legislatively stipulated budget, rather than being a special fund affected by shrinking government contributions.
Third, the Nationality Act (國籍法) should be amended to protect the residency rights of non-Taiwanese and unregistered babies born in the nation. From 2007 to the end of June, the National Immigration Agency received 754 birth reports of non-Taiwanese babies born to foreign migrant workers who had gone missing from their registered employment or to people using false identities.
However, the unofficial number of children without nationality or household registration — which means they cannot enroll at schools or use National Health Insurance resources — is nearly 20,000.
The government should expand the naturalization scope, which is primarily based on jus sanguinis — citizenship based on parentage — and secondarily on jus soli — citizenship based on birthplace — by amending Article 2 of the Nationality Act, so that a person can be adopted or apply for naturalization if they were born in the Republic of China, but the identity of one or both of the parents cannot be confirmed, or if the parents were stateless.
Fourth, the government should grant equal rights to foreign and Chinese spouses, as these legally separate groups do not have equal identity rights. The Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), in particular, should be amended to delete the quota on Chinese spouses and reduce the requirement for permanent residency applications from six years to four.
Fifth, the government should scrap the requirement that a Taiwanese child born in China must be included in household registrations in Taiwan within one year of their birth. An amendment by the Executive Yuan last year sets different standards for children born in China to a Taiwanese-Chinese couple and children born elsewhere outside Taiwan to a Taiwanese and a non-Taiwanese. The regulations regarding China should be revoked.
Opening up residency rights for immigrants and their children would help offset the falling birthrate and would show tolerance to cultural diversity. It would give Taiwan a new image in the age of localization and globalization, a goal worthy of a cohesive public effort.
Wang Gwo-jyh is an associate professor at Ming Chuan University’s department of criminal justice.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US