The National Kaohsiung Center for the Arts (Weiwuying) on Friday last week was honored by Time magazine as one of the “World’s Greatest Places.”
It is a worthy candidate for Taiwan’s first appearance on the annual list, not only for its title as the world’s largest performing arts space under one roof, but also for its observant design that incorporates both natural elements and public need.
Good architecture has countless benefits, one of which is evidenced by Weiwuying’s success. The center, like Taipei 101 before it, is helping raise the nation’s profile with positive international attention.
However, massive buildings are not the only way to generate acclaim, and Taiwan’s builders must think smarter, not bigger.
Public space is the heart of any city, but having too many that offer the same services dilutes their effect. Aside from the national theaters in Taipei, Taichung and now in Kaohsiung, Taoyuan, New Taipei City and Taipei’s Shilin District (士林) are soon to open their own large performance venues, while each county has a cultural center that is too often used just for a handful of days a month.
While large performance spaces are necessary, the number of these massive venues is optimistic, given the nation’s relatively small population of patrons.
Performing arts companies and audiences must first be cultivated, so perhaps construction funds should be spent on small, well-equipped theaters that are better for artists and for engaging communties.
When deciding what types of spaces to build, public planners should spend considerable time speaking with locals and experts to determine real need, rather than gravitating toward the flashiest solution.
However, incorporating public need does not mean sacrificing international acclaim. Smaller-scale projects could also generate buzz, if creatively designed.
Green architecture presents one such opportunity. While green building codes for public buildings have already been implemented for more than a decade, Taiwan could take a bigger lead in championing new technologies and choosing designers and contractors that prioritize environmental impact.
The Beitou Library, the nation’s first certified green building, is an excellent example. It was built with recyclable materials and wood, features rooftop solar panels and has a rainwater collection system, earning the structure a spot on various international rankings.
The library continues to draw tens of thousands of patrons and visitors every year, and it is not just because of its certifications. Its bright and airy design is appealing, especially when many in Taiwan live in dark and crowded apartments.
As the library shows, the government should promote good architecture for its public health benefits as well as a source of acclaim.
Numerous studies have found that built environments directly affect well-being, with city dwellers twice as likely to develop schizophrenia and significantly more at risk for depression and chronic anxiety.
Social and environmental isolation seem largely to blame, but can be helped by sensitively designed spaces that encourage interaction and interface with the natural environment.
Taiwan has long been saddled by the scourge of bad architecture built to accommodate its booming population in the latter half of the 20th century, leading to a maze of concrete and metal.
Both public and private actors should consider improving the built landscape a matter of public health that requires care for every structure, not just major projects.
While international acclaim is welcome, building smarter and more beautiful architecture would create livable spaces that foster engagement and creativity, which in turn would enhance the nation’s international profile more than any single arts center.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past