On July 31, China announced that it would ban individual tourists from traveling to Taiwan from Aug. 1 and threatened to extend the ban to tour groups starting next month. Taiwan’s tourism, hotel and aviation industries are all targets of this indiscriminate, anti-market abuse.
This affects every party campaigning for next year’s presidential election, but is hitting the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) campaign the hardest.
KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) hastily sent “secret envoys” to China for negotiations, and rumor now has it that Beijing might make a U-turn.
The two envoys sent to China were former Mainland Affairs Council deputy minister Chang Hsien-yao (張顯耀) and KMT Mainland Affairs Committee Director Chou Jih-shine (周繼祥).
They left on Aug. 9 and returned the next day. In that 24 hours, they had in-depth discussions with China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Minister Liu Jieyi (劉結一) and other Chinese officials in charge of Taiwan affairs.
The KMT delegation bluntly indicated that the Chinese Ministry of Culture and Tourism’s policy was flawed and seriously damages cross-strait exchanges.
As there have been signs of positive change, Chang and Chou are to visit Beijing again for follow-up talks after updating Wu. They hope to be able to save the nation from being hurt by the ban.
According to China’s linear thinking, putting pressure on Taiwan will sabotage the ruling Democratic Progressive Party, but it forgets that 15 Taiwanese cities and counties are in the KMT’s hands.
The industries that rely heavily on Chinese tourists are also those that are the most welcoming of China “opening up,” a typical example of how ignorance can result in politics outweighing reason.
After Beijing announced the ban, some workers in affected industries petitioned the Ministry of Transportation and Communications and other government agencies for help, but the KMT was the first to be involved, due to its close Chinese connections.
Dozens of local business representatives this month visited the KMT’s Taipei headquarters asking for assistance. Pressured by the election outlook and voter anxiety, Wu had to take the situation seriously.
What the outside world cares more about is that during Chang and Chou’s visit to China, Liu seized on the opportunity to gain a thorough understanding of the campaign of KMT presidential candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), and to investigate the likelihood that KMT Legislator Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) will run for president.
A while ago, the TAO invited several groups of Taiwanese politicians to Beijing for a “chat,” but most of the guests found reasons to postpone or decline the invitation due to the event’s sensitive timing.
As chairman of the largest opposition party, Wu had no choice but to send envoys to Beijing, and the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party did exchange opinions on next year’s presidential election.
What did they discuss?
In a democracy, this is a serious question. The 2016 US presidential election was followed by a investigation into alleged Russian interference.
What is the status of the rule of law in Taiwan? How far can a politician go before crossing the line? Perhaps the KMT leadership owes an explanation not only to President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), but also to Wang, Gou and Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who might also have presidential aspirations.
Tzou Jiing-wen is the editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper).
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past