As a professor of political science, I am often invited to analyze public opinion polls, so I am often among the first to see the results of surveys. I have been doing this for years, and based on my experience, poll results in Taiwan are full of strange surprises. A look at the slew of polls released last week on prospects for the presidential election on Jan. 11 next year would leave one wondering which one really reflects public opinion.
The Formosa online news service appointed Beacon Marketing and Research to conduct a survey on New Taipei City residents’ support for prospective presidential candidates. According to this survey, in a duel between President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of the Democratic Progressive Party and Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Tsai would be the winner with a support rate of 41.5 percent against Han’s 36.2 percent. If Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were added as a third candidate, the three contenders would have about equal support.
These results are similar to those of a poll conducted at about the same time by the Green Party Taiwan, except that the Green Party poll gave Tsai a bigger lead over Han at 7 percentage points and put Tsai 5 percentage points ahead of Han in a three-way contest.
The Taiwan New Constitution Foundation, which was established at the end of last year, appointed Trend Survey to do its survey. The results, announced on Aug. 7, showed that Tsai would trounce Han by 51 percent to 31.2 percent in a two-way vote and she would still be far ahead if Ko were added to the mix.
The Chinese-language Apple Daily appointed Statinc to conduct a poll whose results were announced at about the same time. This poll found that there would not be much of a gap between Tsai and Han in a two-way race, but if Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) were to join the fray with Ko as his running mate, Gou would be ahead of both Tsai and Han. Interestingly, if only the results from landline interviews are counted, Gou’s lead over Han goes up to 6 percentage points. Ironically, was it not Gou who suggested some time ago that a purely landline-based poll would be unfair to him?
At the same time, the Taiwan Competitiveness Forum appointed Taiwan Real Survey to conduct the same kind of poll. This survey put Han ahead of his rivals in a three-way and a four-way contest, but had him leading by the smallest margin in a race between Tsai, Han and Gou.
Within the space of one week, these companies announced completely different results for a three-way race, including wins for Tsai, Gou and Han, or a dead heat for all three. The results put the candidates in just about every possible order.
Given that each of the commissioning organizations has a clear-cut political standpoint, it is reasonable to wonder whether the results have some political purpose other than reflecting public opinion. However, credibility and scientific methods are the basic principles that polling organizations depend on for their existence, so are they willing to sacrifice their credibility to meet clients’ demands?
These companies should bear in mind that surveys on electoral support rates will eventually be put to the test by the actual election. All will be revealed on the day the votes are counted. Are they not worried that the election results will cause the public to question the way the polls were conducted? Maybe they assume that people will have forgotten by then.
Taiwan is an island, and not a very big one, but a rough estimate puts the number of opinion poll companies at more than 20. Each of these companies has considerable operating costs, but given the fierce competition, their asking price for conducting a survey has hardly ever gone up. It is easy to imagine how tough it must be in their line of business.
Besides, there are not many contracts available, and independent polling companies face competition from polls conducted by academic institutions and the media. It is not hard to imagine that polling company operators, for the sake of getting work and staying in business, might lower their standards by bending results to meet their clients’ requirements. That would explain why there is only one public opinion, but all kinds of poll results.
Given this situation, Taiwanese have to do a bit more homework than voters in other countries. Whenever election results come out, people need to look back and compare them with the forecasts made by polling companies. They can then use social media to tell everyone about the pollsters that got their forecasts badly wrong, so that they will get kicked out of the market.
Unless public opinion rises up against misleading polls, it will always be a tool that political hacks use to manipulate and mislead people.
Yang Tai-shuenn is a professor in Chinese Culture University’s Graduate School of Political Science.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95