Almost 14 months ago, China Labor Watch accused Foxconn Technology Group of breaking multiple Chinese labor laws at its plant in Hengyang by hiring too many temporary workers, underpaying its employees, subjecting them to verbal abuse and forcing some of them to work more than 100 hours of overtime per month and more than two consecutive weeks at a time.
The plant was assembling Amazon.com’s Echo Dot speakers and Kindle e-readers. Amazon said it knew of the problems and had asked Foxconn to take corrective measures.
Foxconn, known as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co in Taiwan, and founded by tycoon-turned-political-wannabe Terry Gou (郭台銘), promised to make changes. It apparently did — by making working conditions at the plant even worse.
While allegations of abusive labor conditions at Foxconn plants in China are nothing new, given a decade of such reports, they became an issue again in Taiwan earlier this year when Gou threw his red baseball hat into the ring for next year’s presidential election.
Gou is out of the running, having placed second in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential primary, but his name is still being bandied about as a possible running mate for either the KMT’s candidate, Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), or independent-turned-own-party-founder Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). Not only have Gou and his supporters played up his business acumen and management skills as qualifications for being able to help revive Taiwan’s economy, Gou has repeatedly talked about the need to do something for the younger generation.
On Monday, a member of Gou’s campaign team for the KMT primary said the tycoon would establish a platform to facilitate dialogue with young people, because he knows that university students have many questions and he wants to offer them a helping hand.
That might sound very noble, except the Guardian on Thursday broke the news that Foxconn documents leaked to China Labor Watch show that not only has the company again contravened Chinese labor laws at its Hengyang plant by employing hundreds of teenage vocational-school students as “interns” to meet production targets for Amazon’s Alexa devices, it did so because it decided the benefits outweighed the risks.
Chinese labor laws bar factories from making teenagers or student interns work nights or overtime, yet at a factory management meeting on July 25, according to the Guardian report, it was said that some of the students were refusing to work night shifts and overtime, so their teachers needed to intervene to either make sure they would, or the interns would be sacked.
The newspaper said the documents also showed that Foxconn had last year reduced the pay rates for its Hengyang plant interns. According to the paper, Foxconn blamed the situation on “lax oversight on the part of the local management team,” and said it was taking steps to ensure the situation would not be repeated.
Amazon said it was investigating and would not tolerate violations of its supplier code.
However, such words are basically meaningless, given that they pretty much reiterated the promises both companies made in July last year.
Gou stepped down as Hon Hai’s chief executive officer on June 21, following up on a pledge in mid-April to retire soon so that he could pass on his 45 years of experience to the next generation.
The Guardian report, like so many of the China Labor Watch reports over the past decade, raises troubling questions about manufacturing practices and what abusive labor conditions consumers are willing to overlook to get their hands on the latest craze.
They also raise questions about the value of management or life advice coming from people such as Gou, or Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, whose massive fortunes are built on such practices.
They should certainly raise questions for university students and other young people who might find themselves on the receiving end of Gou’s advice.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers