From the once-pristine rivers of Hindu Kush to the slums of Islamabad, Pakistan is being smothered by plastic due to a lack of public awareness, government inertia and poor waste management.
Plastic bags are a large part of the problem — the nation uses about 55 billion of them each year, according to the Pakistan Plastic Manufacturers’ Association.
Beaches deluged with plastic waste and dying marine life entangled in bags have shocked other nations into action — about 120 have implemented some form of single-use plastic ban.
Pakistan is among them, but struggles with enforcement. There is no cohesive national policy and regional efforts often fail to consider the importance of educational outreach — with many in rural areas claiming to be unaware of the damage single-use plastic can wreak.
“Fighting for the environment? We have no knowledge about that,” said salesman Mohammed Tahir, who uses plastic bags to wrap vegetables for his customers.
The 42-year-old hails from the mountainous Chitral District, which banned the use of such bags two years ago, but to little effect.
“I like plastic bags,” resident Khairul Azam said while shopping at a local market. “Once home, I throw them away... I know it is not good, but we don’t have waste bins in my neighborhood.”
Instead, such waste litters the roadsides and hillsides. It also clogs the streams that feed into the Indus River, which is now the second-most plastic polluted river in the world, behind only the Yangtze River in China, according to a study by the German Environmental Research Center Helmholtz.
Plastics swamp the Arabian Sea coastline, where the sewers of the sprawling port city of Karachi spew its waste.
According to the UN, single-use plastic bags kill up to 1 million birds, hundreds of thousands of marine mammals and turtles, and “countless” fish each year.
However, in Pakistan, authorities say that the amount of plastic used is increasing by 15 percent each year.
Recycling options are limited and waste disposal is often woefully mismanaged — even in the capital, garbage is often simply burned in the street.
“Plastic doesn’t degrade. It only becomes smaller and smaller,” environmental researcher Hassaan Sipra said. “Animals eat it. You eat them. Then it generates liver dysfunctions, diabetes, diarrhea, but because it is cheap and convenient, people don’t see the health consequences.”
A report by the WWF estimated that an average person ingests up to 5g of plastic per week — about equal to the weight of a credit card.
Plastic bags have become part of the “culture” in Pakistan, WWF researcher Nazifa Butt said.
“We would never use a cup of tea without a saucer. You will never be sold anything without a plastic bag. It is considered insulting,” she added.
In Chitral, authorities first tried to ban plastic bags in 2017, with an additional measure passed earlier this year stating that only biodegradable bags — also criticized for their environmental effects — can be used in the area.
Authorities have also backed new environmental awareness campaigns in schools, a local official said.
However, many shops still do not use biodegradable bags and enforcement against single-use plastics remains minimal.
“The local government is not sincere,” Chitral traders’ union chairman Shabir Ahmad said. “They never check the market. They don’t fine the shopkeepers.”
“I can confiscate all the plastic bags in one hour, but then what is the alternative?” said Khurshid Alam Mehsud, a district administrative officer in Chitral, who added more time is needed to address the issue.
Provincial governments in Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, along with municipal authorities in Lahore have issued similar bans, but little has changed on the ground due to lack of law enforcement.
However, Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan’s government — which has long vowed to make environmental issues a priority — is hoping to reverse the plastic tsunami, Adviser to the Prime Minister of Pakistan for Climate Change Malik Amin Aslam said.
As of Wednesday next week, plastic bags are to be banned in Islamabad, with violators subject to heavy fines.
“This love affair with plastic has to end in Pakistan,” said Aslam, who hopes that the ban would serve as a “model” for the rest of the country.
Some shopkeepers in Islamabad appeared prepared for the move, but others said they were unaware of the measure.
Plastics manufacturers — which say that up to 400,000 people work directly or indirectly in the industry — have also raised concerns, but Khan’s government says that action is necessary regardless.
“It’s a health menace, it’s an economic menace, it is an environmental menace. It is something that we need to get rid of,” Aslam said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past