University acceptance scams
Chung Pang-yu’s (鍾邦友) observations shine a much-needed light on a problem that has received a great deal of media attention in the US — the methods by which a prospective college student attracts the attention of admissions boards and is granted permission to attend a coveted university (“Ministry must face problems at university,” July 29, page 6).
The saga continues in the US, with a seemingly unending parade of wealthy businesspeople and celebrity parents and, sadly, educators and education counselors, being tried in court and found guilty of illegally gaining acceptance to a college or university for someone’s child.
As a college professor who has taught at more than a half-dozen institutions over the past two decades, I find these actions reprehensible.
While my overriding goal has always been to provide my students with the best education possible based on my own professional experience and education, I find it disheartening that there is the possibility that at least one of the students sitting in class is there simply because his or her parents had the financial wherewithal to “buy” that seat. I want my students to be there because they truly want to succeed and are academically qualified to meet the university’s standards and mine.
I understand the “bragging rights” that colleges and universities themselves covet by being able to say their application rate was “X” and their acceptance rate was “Y.” However, those numbers should represent genuinely ambitious, highly motivated young men and women eager to make their mark in the world.
I truly hope that the Ministry of Education will take a hard, close look at the standards employed to identify qualifying applicants for what should be a “seat of honor” and not another example of “money talks.”
Kirk Hazlett
Tampa, Florida
Mayor Ko’s party name
Tomorrow Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is to found a party called “台灣民眾黨,” which roughly translates to “Taiwan People’s Party.” Such a name has already caused some controversy (“Ko launches ‘Taiwan people’s party’,” Aug. 2, page 1).
The Taiwan People’s Party was founded by Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水) as the first party in Taiwan during Japanese rule (1895-1945). The name is a part of the nation’s cultural heritage, which should be respected rather than used.
In addition, the Taiwan People’s Party is a rough translation and can be confused with the People First Party.
If Ko really likes the name Taiwan People’s Party, he should consider using its properly translated Chinese name “台灣人民眾黨.”
If Ko does not like this Chinese name either, he could consider using “台灣家親黨” (Taiwan family affinity party) to reflect the spirit of his favorite political slogan: “One family on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.”
Ko is a physician with a high IQ of 157. He is smart enough to create a name for his party without copying from others.
Ko is also a smart politician who should try to avoid any unnecessary protests or litigations, especially regarding his party’s name.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused