University acceptance scams
Chung Pang-yu’s (鍾邦友) observations shine a much-needed light on a problem that has received a great deal of media attention in the US — the methods by which a prospective college student attracts the attention of admissions boards and is granted permission to attend a coveted university (“Ministry must face problems at university,” July 29, page 6).
The saga continues in the US, with a seemingly unending parade of wealthy businesspeople and celebrity parents and, sadly, educators and education counselors, being tried in court and found guilty of illegally gaining acceptance to a college or university for someone’s child.
As a college professor who has taught at more than a half-dozen institutions over the past two decades, I find these actions reprehensible.
While my overriding goal has always been to provide my students with the best education possible based on my own professional experience and education, I find it disheartening that there is the possibility that at least one of the students sitting in class is there simply because his or her parents had the financial wherewithal to “buy” that seat. I want my students to be there because they truly want to succeed and are academically qualified to meet the university’s standards and mine.
I understand the “bragging rights” that colleges and universities themselves covet by being able to say their application rate was “X” and their acceptance rate was “Y.” However, those numbers should represent genuinely ambitious, highly motivated young men and women eager to make their mark in the world.
I truly hope that the Ministry of Education will take a hard, close look at the standards employed to identify qualifying applicants for what should be a “seat of honor” and not another example of “money talks.”
Kirk Hazlett
Tampa, Florida
Mayor Ko’s party name
Tomorrow Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is to found a party called “台灣民眾黨,” which roughly translates to “Taiwan People’s Party.” Such a name has already caused some controversy (“Ko launches ‘Taiwan people’s party’,” Aug. 2, page 1).
The Taiwan People’s Party was founded by Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水) as the first party in Taiwan during Japanese rule (1895-1945). The name is a part of the nation’s cultural heritage, which should be respected rather than used.
In addition, the Taiwan People’s Party is a rough translation and can be confused with the People First Party.
If Ko really likes the name Taiwan People’s Party, he should consider using its properly translated Chinese name “台灣人民眾黨.”
If Ko does not like this Chinese name either, he could consider using “台灣家親黨” (Taiwan family affinity party) to reflect the spirit of his favorite political slogan: “One family on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.”
Ko is a physician with a high IQ of 157. He is smart enough to create a name for his party without copying from others.
Ko is also a smart politician who should try to avoid any unnecessary protests or litigations, especially regarding his party’s name.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95