It sounds unpleasant, even painful. However, as they ponder the linked challenges posed by China and Russia, Pentagon strategists are earnestly discussing whether Vladimir Putin, Russia’s famously athletic president, will perform a “reverse Nixon.”
This is neither a daring swivel on the parallel bars nor an unusual sexual position. At issue is whether Putin would emulate the 37th US president, Richard Nixon, whose groundbreaking 1972 Cold War outreach to China tilted the strategic balance in the US’ favor.
“If Putin performed a “reverse Nixon” and played his own version of the “China card,” the world system, and US influence in it, “would be completely upended,” a recent Pentagon study of Russian strategic intentions said.
A China-Russia axis is not a new idea, but the question is gaining in topicality. Look no further than last week’s aerial confrontation over the Sea of Japan, also known as the East Sea. For the first time, China and Russia joined forces to mount an air patrol using long-range bombers and spy planes.
South Korea and Japan separately scrambled fighter jets to intercept the intruders, saying their sovereign airspace and air defense zones had been violated — which Moscow and Beijing denied. South Korean pilots fired almost 400 warning shots.
The incident was alarming, militarily speaking, but it also highlights burgeoning security, economic and diplomatic collaboration between two major powers both bitterly at odds with US President Donald Trump’s America.
China’s expanding global influence was once viewed by Washington as healthy competition. Now it is seen as a threat. Flashpoints include Taiwan, Hong Kong and Beijing’s militarization of the South China Sea. Trump’s punitive trade dispute has exacerbated China’s economic slowdown and further soured ties.
Moscow is in the doghouse over its interference in the 2016 US election and other “gray zone” cyberops. Russia’s actions in Syria, Ukraine, Venezuela and a reviving nuclear arms race, have also caused tension.
In contrast, China and Russia agree on many issues, principally the obsolescence of liberal democracy and the attractions of authoritarian governance.
When Putin last month hosted Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Moscow, they celebrated a 30 percent year-on-year increase in bilateral trade and signed various cooperation deals. Russia is selling China its latest weaponry, including S400 ground-to-air missiles and SU-35 jets.
Bigger, more frequent joint military exercises are planned, matching their diplomatic coordination in the UN security council. Putin has met Xi about 30 times since 2013. Xi calls him his “best and bosom friend.”
All this backslapping bonhomie is deeply troubling, not just for Pentagon war-gamers, but also for Western allies across East Asia concerned by deteriorating security.
Japan, resentful of Trump’s complaints over burden-sharing, is on the front line of the nuclear standoff with Chinese-backed North Korea.
Trump’s two summit meetings with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un have failed to produce any movement on denuclearization. Now things are beginning to unravel. On Thursday, Pyongyang resumed ballistic missile testing .
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, while pursuing improved relations with China, also wants his country to be more self-reliant militarily.
However, he failed to secure a mandate to change Tokyo’s pacifist constitution in this months Upper House elections. That has tied his hands — which suits China and Russia just fine.
Compared with Japan, South Korea’s relations with China are less encumbered by historical baggage. However, the large US military presence there is a constant irritant, symbolized by last year’s fierce row with Beijing over the US deployment of new missile defenses.
In Seoul, too, Trump’s whingeing about unfair trade and defense costs has raised questions about US reliability.
At the same time, his ego-trip summitry has detracted from South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s more considered peace efforts, which are now under fire from North Korea.
A lack of consistent US leadership and regional strategic vision is handing Beijing some easy “wins.” Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte this year lamely agreed to shelve bilateral territorial and fishing disputes under pressure from Xi. Cambodia has reportedly agreed to host a Chinese naval base, although it officially denied it.
Meanwhile China, sensing division and weakness, is noisily amplifying its long-standing objections to US — and British — geopolitical “meddling.” After more violence in Hong Kong last week, it pointedly told the US to remove its “black hand.”
Xi is simultaneously ramping up pressure on US-protected Taiwan. In a defense white paper published last week, Beijing vowed to “resolutely defeat anyone attempting to separate Taiwan from China and safeguard national unity at all costs.”
This sterner-than-usual warning followed Washington’s decision to supply US$2.2 billion in arms to Taiwan and a heightened US naval presence in the Taiwan Strait.
Yet despite these US moves, Taiwan, in common with other rattled regional friends and allies, doubts Trump can be counted on.
The white paper’s verdict was defiantly hostile. Trump’s US, it said, was “undermining global strategic stability.”
Yet China was not daunted. Defense modernization would be completed by 2035, thereby “fully transforming [China’s military] into world-class forces,” it said.
That is the looming challenge facing the region and post-1945 US strategic dominance.
Former US president Barack Obama’s “pivot to Asia” is all but forgotten, while Trump’s approach lacks coherence. Factor in a growing China-Russia alliance and it is easy to see why Pentagon planners worry.
Perhaps their best hope is that Russia, an economically weaker partner whose interests do not always align with Beijing’s, will ultimately rebuff the embrace of its domineering new bedfellow.
What is needed now is a “reverse Putin.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US