Taoyuan International Airport Corp (TIAC) chairman Wang Ming-de (王明德) on Sunday last week said that a design change would be needed to attract bids on the main building of its planned Terminal 3, according to a Central News Agency report, because no contractor would submit a tender on a project with such a strange shape and difficult construction. Earlier this year the Executive Yuan agreed to increase the construction budget by NT$4.2 billion (US$135.04 million) to NT$78.9 billion, leaving little room to adjust the budget further.
Terminal 3 would be the nation’s single largest building constructed for public use in almost 50 years.
In 2015, TIAC opened international bidding on the project, and the design contract was won by the British architectural firm Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners, an internationally renowned team led by Richard Rogers, who has been awarded the Pritzker Architecture Prize, the highest honor in architecture.
In Taiwan, the British firm is famous for its design of the large aluminum canopy over the Kaohsiung Central Park MRT Station.
With the design being developed by such a world-famous team, winning the bid and completing the construction would put the contractor on the map. However, no company dares to bid on the Terminal 3 project for the same reason that the Tamkang Bridge (淡江大橋) project failed to attract a bidder until the construction budget was increased many times.
On construction projects, the higher in the company hierarchy someone is, the easier it is to make money, but the closer to the construction someone is — on-site supervisors, building contractors, workers — the harder the work and the greater the risk.
A responsible designer and project planner considers a construction site’s location and the skill of the construction workers, conceiving a design that matches that context.
Here are four recommendations for attracting bidders and preventing contractors from going bankrupt midway through a project:
First, the government should tighten the requirements for serving on a procurement evaluation committee and train committee members how to match the procurement process to the size of the tender. They should receive remuneration commensurate with their expertise and be held legally responsible for the outcome. When power and accountability are in balance, experts are more willing to evaluate or review large contracts.
Second, some projects work well as turnkey contracts, where a single team designs, oversees and constructs the project. Team sections share the responsibility and turn the plans into a feasible construction, instead of becoming stuck in the present scenario, in which the designers, after turning over the construction drawings and receiving their fee, pass responsibility for the project’s construction on to the contractor and the owner.
The winning construction company is most unfortunate, as it must handle any construction difficulties while managing the pressure of completing construction before the deadline.
The owner is also to be pitied, as any leaks or other problems after construction will be sharply criticized and must be resolved by them. They will need to clean up the mess, while the architects and the design team have already taken the money and left.
Third, the public tender announcement should say that the winning bidder will receive a bonus for completing construction ahead of schedule.
In 2007, the MacArthur Maze, a large freeway interchange connecting Interstate 80 with the San Francisco Bay Area, was damaged by fire after a tanker truck flipped over. A contract to repair the damage within 51 days was won with a bid of US$876,075.
The winning contractor deployed 300 people to work around the clock and the project was completed in just 18 days, bringing the bidder a US$5 million bonus for early completion.
Compared with the economic effects of the collapse — a toll reaching into the tens of millions of US dollars — the US$5 million bonus was a no-brainer.
Fourth, the government should establish national construction teams, such as the previously state-owned RSEA Engineering Corp or BES Engineering Corp, so that major construction projects with engineering complexities that have failed to attract bidders several times can be rescued.
Lai Ming-huang is an engineer, with a doctorate in engineering from National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US