At the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) National Congress on Sunday, Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) was officially nominated as the party’s candidate for next year’s presidential election. During his acceptance speech, Han struck a combative tone, making a number of hyperbolic remarks about the state of the nation and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration.
Han’s speech signals that the KMT’s strategy for the election campaign will be to go light on facts and heavy on emotion, in an attempt to blindside the DPP and bamboozle the electorate.
In his speech, Han initially attempted to paint his candidacy as a solemn duty that he feels compelled to shoulder: “People assume I am filled with joy [for the nomination], but in fact the responsibility weighs heavy on my heart.” It is richly ironic for Han to talk of “responsibility” since by standing as the KMT’s presidential candidate, he has casually jettisoned, less than one year into his mayoralty, the promise he made to Kaohsiung residents to serve them faithfully.
If Han does step down as mayor, it might be a blessing in disguise for Kaohsiung residents: His checkered record in office has been punctuated with wild promises to “Make Kaohsiung rich,” but few concrete achievements. Meanwhile, as Kaohsiung struggles with an increasing number of dengue fever cases, Han’s response to calm a concerned populace was to engage in a bizarre photo op: climbing a tree for the cameras during an “inspection” of prevention work with local officials.
In his speech, Han moved on to frame the election as an existential moment for the nation, saying that it would not be a civilized competition, but a “life or death” battle for the Republic of China (ROC) and its people. It would be a choice between opening up or isolation, cross-strait peace or war, he added.
Han accused the DPP administration of becoming increasingly corrupt, without providing any evidence.
Equally concerning was KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih’s (吳敦義) contribution. In a speech, Wu identified the so-called “1992 consensus” as a key foundation to ensuring stable cross-strait relations.
This is dangerous, as recognizing the “consensus” would not mean simply reverting to former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) formula of “one China, with each side having their own interpretation of what that means.” In a speech on Jan. 2, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) moved the goalposts, redefining the “1992 consensus” to include a Taiwanese version of Hong Kong’s “one country, two systems” model. Accepting the “1992 consensus” now means accepting rule by China.
Meanwhile, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), who lost to Han in the party’s presidential primary, was conspicuously absent from the congress. It might be that Gou is gearing up to throw his hat into the ring as an independent. As Taiwan’s wealthiest individual, he certainly has deep pockets and the ability to self-fund a savvy, social media-based campaign. If he does, this will likely split the “blue vote” and would be manna from heaven for the DPP. However Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) could yet fracture the “green vote” if he decides to join the race.
Under Han, the KMT’s electoral strategy appears to push for a maximum polarization of national politics and to radicalize his support base by vilifying the DPP as reckless and destructive warmongers who, if allowed to remain in office for another four years, would catapult the nation toward catastrophe.
The DPP’s response so far has been relatively calm, with President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) criticizing Han for being “all talk,” saying that good government is about quietly getting on with making people’s lives better. However, it will be tempting for the party to fight fire with fire. Fasten your seatbelts: It’s going to be a roller-coaster ride.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past