Europe was hit by an exceptional heat wave last month. On June 28, the temperature in Gallargues-le-Montueux in southern France reached a record 45.9°C.
According to a report by the United Daily News, the heat wave was caused by hot air moving northward from the Sahara into western and central Europe. To cool down, people scrambled to buy fans and air-conditioning units, apart from playing with water.
Air-conditioning was not common in Europe before. Data from the International Energy Agency showed that while 90 percent of US households own air-conditioners, fewer than 5 percent of European homes have them since temperatures of above 32°C often lasted for no more than five days a year.
However, summer temperatures in Europe have been rising rapidly in the past few years, often lasting up to two weeks per month. An article in US News & World Report said that such a transition was forcing European homeowners, offices and health centers to consider investing in air-conditioning. This would affect European governments’ assessment of sustainability goals to become carbon neutral.
Taiwan has also been sweltering in high temperatures during summer in recent years. Is it also suffering from a heat wave? As an island nation, Taiwan rarely suffers from scorching temperatures of over 40°C. However, the urban heat island effect might have a bigger impact on Taiwanese cities than severe heat waves caused by climate change.
Vehicle exhaust, dense concrete buildings and asphalt roads cause increases in urban temperature. When people keep using air-conditioning, it releases waste heat into the atmosphere, making it even hotter outside and creating a vicious cycle of heat absorption.
Air quality has also deteriorated drastically. Ground-level ozone pollution caused by the interaction between the sun’s ultraviolet rays and artificial pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds, are harmful to health and can trigger asthma, eye discomfort and respiratory problems.
The most effective method to alleviate the urban heat island effect is to expand a city’s green area by planting trees that can form a dense and complex canopy to provide shade and intercept particulate pollution. At present, the total area of greenery that covers the six special municipalities is less than 10 percent.
Reports have also said that the government has not paid much attention to the maintenance of street trees. Narrow tree wells and excessively compacted soil resulting from wrong planting management make it difficult for the roots of such trees to grow normally. If the canopy does not grow well because the roots are restricted, the trees would not be able to form an effective shade.
Another way is to create a wind ventilation corridor to enhance urban air mobility, and introduce cold and humid air from the river into an urban area. European cities such as Munich, Germany, began this practice in the 1970s.
As for Taiwan, buildings are increasingly being built near rivers for better views, blocking the entrance of wind corridors. Furthermore, the high complexity of wind field simulation and poor control of current urban design regulation for land development are also challenges for policymakers and urban planners.
In the face of the threats from extreme climate change and the urban heat island effect, the government should enhance the nation’s green infrastructure through planting design and management. Green areas, parks and rivers for wind corridors are also indispensable to purify the air and reduce the risks of high temperatures in every aspect.
Wang Pin-hui is working on a master’s degree in landscape architecture at the University of Virginia.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers