Food services needed
For a long time, the Council of Agriculture has been responsible for agricultural, fishery and husbandry production at the front-end, while the Ministry of Health and Welfare, recently reorganized, has been responsible for medical and healthcare services at the back-end.
However, an institution responsible for the crucial middle-end food and nutrition service has been missing in Taiwan’s government system.
Take the Food and Nutrition Service under the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), for example. It is funding 16 nutrition assistance programs that provide long-term care to those in need, and has built an online platform for the management and integration of the agricultural product supply chain.
Everything from purchase and distribution to the tracking of food is registered at and implemented by the platform.
Every day, tens of millions of Americans obtain healthy food, form dietary habits and increase their nutritional knowledge with help from the USDA’s concrete aid.
The Council of Agriculture’s Agriculture and Food Agency has established four branches: the northern, central, southern and eastern regional offices.
Each township has its own farmers’ or fishermen’s association. Supermarkets and convenience stores are widely available nationwide, while the domestic logistics transportation network is complete.
As there is still no agreement on the division of duties between the proposed ministries of agriculture and of environment and resources, the government should seriously consider including food and nutrition services with the duties of the agriculture ministry to strengthen the new ministries’ service functions.
Barry Hsu
Taitung
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers