Taiwan might still be barred from the World Health Assembly and UN events, but two news items show that it continues to quietly make strides in areas where China blatantly fails.
After hosting the Oslo Freedom Forum in November last year, Taiwan this year is to remain the forum’s only Asian destination since its inception in 2009.
Organizers last week announced that it would return to Taiwan in September, explicitly saying that it is a symbolic move to hold two consecutive forums in Taiwan focusing on human rights, democracy and freedom.
The Oslo-based event’s only other satellite destination for the forum this year is in Mexico City, making Taiwan stand out on the human rights world map as a place where the forum’s main topics of information warfare, cybersecurity and transgender rights are highly relevant.
One of this year’s speakers is Hong Kong singer and democracy advocate Denise Ho (何韻詩). Once popular in China, Ho has been banned from performing there due to her activism. On Monday last week, Ho spoke out against Chinese treatment of Hong Kong at the UN Human Rights Council. After being interrupted twice by the Chinese delegate, she ended her speech by asking that China be removed from the council.
That Ho will be able to speak freely in Taiwan shows the global community that the two nations operate under very different political systems and values.
With politics so ingrained in everyday life and discourse in Taiwan, it is easy to forget that much of the world actually knows little of the nation’s diplomatic plight and political situation. For example, Egyptian LGBTQ advocate Omar Sharif Jr told the Taipei Times during last year’s forum that he was “shocked to learn that Taiwan only has official diplomatic ties with 17 countries.”
At the time, groups opposed to LGBTQ rights had just scored a victory through national referendums, and Sharif used his newfound knowledge to make a point, saying: “Almost every Taiwanese knows what it feels like to be marginalized by the family of nations out there. I don’t know why you would do that inwardly to your own citizens.”
Taiwan’s international marginalization obviously left an impression on him, and hopefully also had an effect on other attendees.
In addition, Taiwanese delegates are participating in the US-backed Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom in Washington, which ends tomorrow. The nation also participated last year, and in March hosted a follow-up event, titled “A civil society dialogue on securing religious freedom in the Indo-
Pacific region,” of which a significant portion focused on religious persecution in China.
At that event, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and US Ambassador-at-large for Religious Freedom Sam Brownback issued a joint statement calling for more religious freedom in Asia — without directly naming China. Tsai also spoke of how religious freedom is woven into everyday life in Taiwan.
While the global powers might not care much for these events and continue to marginalize Taiwan at China’s behest, human rights and democracy are areas upon which China is unlikely to exert much influence, except in the UN. It is one of the few avenues where Taiwan can shine and be heard, and its continuous participation in such events is the way to move forward.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS